The post something funny thread

[ChristianGianni]

 

[KaraBulut]

 

[pornoboy]

​

 

[NotHardUp1]

This is a GAY forum. That is NOT what "chicken" means.

 

[pornoboy]

This is a GAY forum. That is NOT what "chicken" means.

sorry for the lady - but she`s so gay..!​

 

[Araucaria]

I once had a conversation with a Twink while I was on vacation, in a bar back home, who insisted he was chicken That seemed a rather strange assertion, since among the gay guys at college chicken specifically meant you were underage, as opposed to the college students who had reached majority. I was about the same age as that Twink, and I certainly did not consider myself chicken.

 

[NotHardUp1]

I once had a conversation with a Twink while I was on vacation, in a bar back home, who insisted he was chicken That seemed a rather strange assertion, since among the gay guys at college chicken specifically meant you were underage, as opposed to the college students who had reached majority. I was about the same age as that Twink, and I certainly did not consider myself chicken.

Of course you weren't. You were a chicken hawk in his mind.

 

[gsdx]

Naked man looking down as he walks across a mirrored floor: "Well, that's another way of looking at it."

 

[Reischfleger]

 

[pornoboy]

​

 

[smokeshadow]

anyone want a 1965 Hemi?

 

[Alistair]

View attachment 2012371​

The funny thing is Jack Daniel’s is actually suing for copyright infringement over that dog toy.

 

[ChristianGianni]

 

[NotHardUp1]

I strongly suspect Jack Daniel's will win the copyright infringement case. There is not an unlimited right to parody, particularly when the expressed purpose it to profit from appropriating the image of the copyright holder.

 

[Kahaih]

/\ There may be a problem with defecation of character, too, with that 'The Old No. 2 on your Tennessee carpet' bit.

 

[Riverrick]

^ I think their concern is misplaced. When people see those dog toys its free advertising for them since they are a well known and familiar brand. They should be encouraging this rather than filing a silly lawsuit.

 

[The Loner]

 

[EJMichaels]

I strongly suspect Jack Daniel's will win the copyright infringement case. There is not an unlimited right to parody, particularly when the expressed purpose it to profit from appropriating the image of the copyright holder.

Yes, parody for art is not the same as parody for profit. The product is selling for $20, which probably wouldn't happen without the JD brand recognition. Interestingly, at least one justice didn't get the joke. On the other hand, dog toys have been made in the image of recognized products for decades. Not all of the toys in that company's line go so far in possibly offensive content -- they're just silly. This one might be questionable.

 

[pornoboy]

​

 

[Charon]