The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

The unthinkable: a 17-yr-old at the Tate in London threw a 6-yr.-old French tourist off the 10th floor balcony

There have always been the sociopaths out there who think nothing of causing harm or pain because they simply lack the empathetic response centre in their brains.

I suspect that way back when...some early human kid pushed another one of the cliff for no reason except to see him fall.
 
Ain't that the truth.
 
NotHardUp1 said:
I believe they described the attack as throwing the boy. It doesn't seem at all like it was some scuffle, but a cold-hearted attempt at murdering the child.

It's a miracle the father of the boy didn't kill the teen then and there.
Click to expand...
Actually, right on the scene, someone punched the shit out of the teen and he was locked in a bathroom for his safety until the police arrived.
 
Thank you. A glimmer of hope anyway.

The journalists are as inept as ever:

BBC News said:
A six-year-old boy who was allegedly thrown off a balcony at the Tate Modern is making "amazing progress", his family have said.
Click to expand...

The boy was not allegedly thrown off a balcony. He WAS thrown off a balcony. It's a crime. It was witnessed. The teen who did is is an alleged criminal until it is proven he did it. TV news makes this same mistake all the time. For liability purposes, they insert "allegedly" when it isn't applicable.

I hope he doesn't get a harsh sentence, nothing more than throwing him off a 10-story building.
 
^ It's precisely because he has not been judged and sentenced yet, that "allegedly" is the proper term to use.

It's not a mere formality, and it's not either about consider someone a criminal or a good person, not even about not jumping into conclusions, but merely about not getting used to take things for granted, acting sloppily and let the guts and its convictions take the place and function of the brains: some people would talk a lot about "preserving Civilization" and "defending the Western world", but they are the first to erode it with their shoddy thinking.

- - - Updated - - -

It's like with people: one may be tempted to conclude that someone is an idiot by reading a shocking phrase he wrote, but then one needs to...
 
Game of Thrones

Jamie pushed Bran out the window (life imitating art)

Will children burned at the stake be next
 
Just to get on the Television News, Sweet Jaysus, he could've run across the field of any sporting match bare-assed naked and made it on the Television News.
 
^ This is no country for streakers, only for people comfortable with their own nudity... and people not so much comfortable with it.
 
Fling him off a 10-story building. Let the god of math do his work.

It was a barbaric crime. It deserves a barbaric punishment.
 
NotHardUp1 said:
Fling him off a 10-story building. Let the god of math do his work.

It was a barbaric crime. It deserves a barbaric punishment.
Click to expand...

It's a very barbaric punishment for someone that is obviously some kind of mentally deficient.
 
Alistair said:
It's a very barbaric punishment for someone that is obviously some kind of mentally deficient.
Click to expand...

Indeed, a total bampot, sadly he'll be out on the streets again in a few years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top