NotHardUp1
What? Me? Really?
Who be such a wussy about it and let him get away so lightly? Let him spend a life behind bars. There is no greater punishment.
Hmmm. That would be an interesting test. We ask a psychopath whether he would choose life imprisonment over the death penalty, and when he chooses prison, execute him to add to the disappointment. That would seem like the greater punishment indeed if he averred from it.
Of course, if he's insane, could he make a rational decision?
Unfortunately, it's not acid/base titration. Lots of insane killers in fact function quite well in normal social standards, or at least don't stand out.
Somehow, we have contorted criminal insanity to mean some kind of unaccountability. Plenty of the criminally insane are fully aware of how unacceptable murder is, but we somehow give them a pass because they are allegedly not capable of being accountable because they do act irrationally. Being irrational does not mean one is not capable of evil, or of understanding the full consequences of one's actions.
If he's too dangerous to ever be let out of prison/asylum ever again, then what is the point really? Are we helping him by giving him some coloring books and juice and locking him in his room for 70 years so he can die "naturally."
Put him down. End it.
If society were allowed to vote on sentencing, I'm pretty sure he'd be a dead man right now in France, public policy notwithstanding.

