The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

The US goes to War

I would think that with the ending of the American security umbrella nuclear proliferation is coming to a country near you soon.
 
I'm hoping that France decides to place some on St. Pierre and Miquelon.
 
So where are all the nattering nancies who were terrified that Biden would get the US into a war?

Well...it gets even better kids...Trump is going NUKE-YOU-LAHR again.

Because you know what the world needs right now? Testing of Nukes.

This is another example of what an idiot Trump is.

Russia tested a nuclear-powered missile. Not a nuclear warhead.

Trump beat his chest and declared that the "Department of War" would match Russia's testing.

Control of the US nuclear arsenal is under the Department of Energy. The staffing comes from the military but the experts on nuclear warheads is (or was) under a group of experts in the DoE.

Idiocracy.


There's a infamous joke about Soviet technology:
Q. What doesn't fit in your ass and doesn't buzz?
A. A Russian-made ass-buzzer.

Trump fell for another Putin bluff.
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile, the threat of military invasion in Nigeria.

Right. The only solution to about 4000 Christians and 2500 Muslims being killed is to go in and kill more.

bafkreickfbyju2vr2dbblsn5b4p6mefvnhijnbs7nnprn3nh6gqz3ewbb4@jpeg
 
Meanwhile, the threat of military invasion in Nigeria.

Right. The only solution to about 4000 Christians and 2500 Muslims being killed is to go in and kill more.

bafkreickfbyju2vr2dbblsn5b4p6mefvnhijnbs7nnprn3nh6gqz3ewbb4@jpeg
And nearly 2,000 Sudanese Muslims were killed this week. Where's the outrage about those atrocities? Oh, that's right... there's no Islamic representation in the White House Office of Talking in Tongues and Snakehandling.
 
US deployment to the Carribbean waters has reached 16,000 troops according to WaPo.

You don't send that many without planning an invasion.

And you don't send that many without expecting opposition. Or occupation.

And this is just a test run.
 
And nearly 2,000 Sudanese Muslims were killed this week. Where's the outrage about those atrocities? Oh, that's right... there's no Islamic representation in the White House Office of Talking in Tongues and Snakehandling.
And I don't think Sudan has oil. So the US is hardly likely to be interested.
 
And I don't think Sudan has oil. So the US is hardly likely to be interested.
It has gold deposits. The key thing is that the east coast of Sudan borders the Suez Canal, so whoever controls Sudan has partial control of oil shipments through the Canal.
sd-01.jpg


The western Press has focused on the Sudan/South Sudan conflict which is a Christian-Muslim conflict (guess which side the US was on?).

There's also a conflict in Sudan itself. If the word "Darfur" rings a bell, then that will give you an idea of how long the conflict there has been going on- since the Obama Administration.

Back when Obama was in the White House, a dictator aligned with Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood movement was in control. That dictator, who had ruled the country with an iron fist for 30 years, was overthrown in 2019 and a democratically elected representative government took its place. Then in 2021, the Sudanese military overthrew the democratically elected government and installed a military general to run the country. Since then, the country has been in a downward spiral. At one time, NGOs and the UN were in the country trying to support the democratic government and then after the military took over, the NGOs tried to help with the famine caused by drought and climate change. It's so bad now that the aid agencies have pulled out and the pullout of USAID was the last straw in the decline.

What is now happening is that there are two military factions fighting for control of the country- one side is backed by Russia and the other side is backed by the Saudis and the UAE. Anne Applebaum has written some very good stories explaining what is happening there and why it is so dangerous that the US is looking the other way while the carnage continues.

This goes back to a salient quote from Bill Gates commenting on what Elon Musk was allowed to do to USAID: "World’s richest man killing the world’s poorest children".

It's another example of the sickness of the Trump White House. You have a group of people trying to eliminate abortion claiming that they care about chlidren and support a "culture of life", while ignoring that millions of children are starving in Sudan. It's sick.


"You know, after the U.S. election, I felt the need to write about the world from a different point of view. My feeling was that the second election of Donald Trump had solidified something. It meant that the withdrawal of the U.S. from international institutions, the end of a certain kind of geopolitical world order was now certain."

"You know, when you - when we say end of the liberal world order, which is something that people do talk about in conference rooms in Washington or in Brussels, what does it mean for people who are not from Europe or America? What does it look like? And what does it look like from Sudan, which is a country that the United States actually used to be interested in and cared a lot about? You know, Darfur was a cause that churches and synagogues in the United States used to follow and donate to and think about. There've been a lot of American diplomats - American charities have worked in Sudan. You know, what does the withdrawal of the United States look like from there?"

"No. Neither side is that interested in popular support. They're interested in control of certain key assets, mostly gold mines, control of particular territories, putting their people in territories. That's why you have these - example after example of ethnic cleansing, of people being chased out of neighborhoods or chased out of areas and replaced with other people. It's also why you have so much theft. Both armies, I think particularly the RSF because it's a kind of mishmash of different kinds of people from different places - but both armies, when they go into neighborhoods, they will rob and kind of pillage houses, take furniture, take washing machines. It's also why you have so many examples and stories of rape. You know, women are repeatedly the victims of war crimes, of people going into neighborhoods or to villages or to houses and just committing acts of violence and also acts of sexual violence."
 
Last edited:
I forgot about the gold.

So just another imperial war between superpowers using warlords to determine the spoils.

Is China also involved in the background in Sudan or are they stepping back to let everyone kill each other and rrrZZZia and the US beat each other senseless before they slide in?

 
I forgot about the gold.

So just another imperial war between superpowers using warlords to determine the spoils.

Is China also involved in the background in Sudan or are they stepping back to let everyone kill each other and rrrZZZia and the US beat each other senseless before they slide in?

Yep... pretty much the post Cold War proxy battles over countries with either a natural resource we want, or a critical piece of land needed for transporting natural resources... or both.

One of the reasons that so many other countries are standing in line to do business with Trump is that he speaks a language they understand: "Pay me tribute and I'll give you business". China has another strategy: "Sell us your resources or allow our companies to operate in your country and we'll send money back to your country in the form of roads, bridges and utilities that our companies need to operate."

That's true of China's business in Africa. They tag is as "The New Silk Road" and they have focused heavily on Nigeria and Angola for its oil reserves. They avoid political entanglements and instead set up their companies and workers there to infuse large amounts of capital into local economies and into upgrading infrastructure. China's interests are probably more concerned with trying to keep the unrest localized to eastern Africa and away from their interests in western Africa. China's antagonism toward Islam has also made them more cautious about operating in northeastern Africa.
 
Last edited:
Having bungled their false flag operation this week, the US bro squad is apparently gearing upto just use blunt force.

Now at least it is out in the open. This is about seizing the oil fields.

 
Back
Top