The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

The Witches and Hags shakeup stew, Bloomberg, Albright, Steinem and Bill Clinton

evanrick

JUB Addict
Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Posts
6,491
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Seattle
Albright said that if you support Bernie over Hillary and your a woman your going to hell, saying “There’s a special place in hell for women who don’t help each other” Talking about women voting for Hillary and those that don't.
Gloria Steinem, a long time feminist, suggested that women were motivated to vote for Sanders purely to further their own agenda, like meeting a future husband - and not for any other valid reason.
While Clinton surrogates were busy embarrassing their candidate, Mr. Clinton went personal against Bernie, likening Bernie's policies to being inside a "hermetically sealed" box. Bill is frustrated that attacks on Hillary's deep ties to wall street have been so effective on the eve of her defeat in New Hampshire, a place where both he and Hillary have won in the past.
Others have associated Clinton's recent campaign shakeup rumors as the beginning of the end of Hillary's campaign.

Then there's Mr. Bloomberg, the billionaire ex-mayor of wall street itself who is looking for an excuse to run -and looking to change the subject of the 2016 democratic campaign that frequently targets the super rich. Bloomberg is hoping to capitalize on Hillary's defeat, be a spoiler, who knows. If he does enter the race he will have to explain why he is running, any explanation of which would likely backfire.
 
Witches and hags eh?

I have to say that from the outside, I don't really think that the candidate that the OP so clearly wants to be the nominee would approve of the description.

I have to say that the stans of the candidates wouldn't really make me want to support either of them.

It is fine to be passionately FOR your preferred candidate...but it serves no one to insult the supporters of the other candidates in your party.

There is nothing that the opposition loves than seeing their real opponents tear themselves apart.

But just my viewpoint.
 
Witches and hags eh?

I have to say that from the outside, I don't really think that the candidate that the OP so clearly wants to be the nominee would approve of the description.

I have to say that the stans of the candidates wouldn't really make me want to support either of them.

It is fine to be passionately FOR your preferred candidate...but it serves no one to insult the supporters of the other candidates in your party.

There is nothing that the opposition loves than seeing their real opponents tear themselves apart.

But just my viewpoint.

Insults are the purview of the simple minded.
 
^ Good to see you back.
 
Hillary Clinton insults Sanders supporters when she accuses him of smearing her when she has the audacity to suggest that Sanders would rip up Obamacare, like its his #1 goal. How dumb does the Clinton people think we are? Shes arrogant and un-trustworthy, shes been bough off and tricked more than once to flip flop on the bankruptcy bill that wall street wanted and to invade Iraq that republicans wanted. Her husband was a right wing anti-liberal and we are done with those. What is next?
Hillary is right, everyone should be held to account, but clearly Mrs. Clinton is pushing the boundaries of what Democratic voters will accept from their leaders.
 
All in all, I liked Bill when he was in office. Except for 2 major things that he did. DOMA and NAFTA.

dont forget

signed Defense of Marriage Act, welfare reform, massive trade deals like Nafta and Gatt, financial and telecommunications deregulation, and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which served as the basis for last week's Hobby Lobby Supreme Court decision.

http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-28155578

Then there was all the foreign policy, basically the Republicans let Clinton do what they couldnt do on their own. Clinton makes Bush look moderate.
 
Hillary Clinton insults Sanders supporters when she accuses him of smearing her when she has the audacity to suggest that Sanders would rip up Obamacare, like its his #1 goal. How dumb does the Clinton people think we are? Shes arrogant and un-trustworthy, shes been bough off and tricked more than once to flip flop on the bankruptcy bill that wall street wanted and to invade Iraq that republicans wanted. Her husband was a right wing anti-liberal and we are done with those. What is next?
Hillary is right, everyone should be held to account, but clearly Mrs. Clinton is pushing the boundaries of what Democratic voters will accept from their leaders.

It is the harsh name calling like hags and witches that is beneath you as a supporter of Sanders.
 
Hillary Clinton insults Sanders supporters when she accuses him of smearing her when she has the audacity to suggest that Sanders would rip up Obamacare, like its his #1 goal. How dumb does the Clinton people think we are? Shes arrogant and un-trustworthy, shes been bough off and tricked more than once to flip flop on the bankruptcy bill that wall street wanted and to invade Iraq that republicans wanted. Her husband was a right wing anti-liberal and we are done with those. What is next?
Hillary is right, everyone should be held to account, but clearly Mrs. Clinton is pushing the boundaries of what Democratic voters will accept from their leaders.

Excuse the rest of us but he DID smear her. You are aware that this is a political contest?
 
He's been smearing her by association. You can't both say how you want to be civil, and then flat out say that anyone who gets donations from major corporations is bought and paid for. Ultimately, that's an opinion, not a fact, and saying it - or implying it, as the case may be - is exactly smearing.
 
I haven't donated to anyone because I am dirt poor and Hillary doesn't need my money anyway. But you aren't a Bernie supporter, you are a Hillary hater. You are the type who doesn't need someone to love, they need someone to be the enemy.
 
I will absolutely donate to her ...but I will wait. I will also donate to the Kamela Harris campaign to replace outgoing Barbara Boxer when the time comes.

I donate most every election.....but if you do it too early you get these URGENT! notes daily.....
 
I'm going to donate money to whomever wins the nomination, just like always.
 
Back
Top