Thr Lord Of The Rings Vs Harry Potter

[hungbuzz]

Nah, Harry wins. He has a wider choice of spells than gandalf, and a bigger sword than any of the hobbits. Mind you, Aragorn might give him a bit of trouble, but hell, he's got a broomstick! Take out Gandalf and Legolas, then fly above the rest, throwing random offensive stuff at them.

Or imperio Aragorn and have him give everyone a good ol' fashioned arse whoopin'.

and the good old Arvada Cardava the good old killing curse that has no defence and only one known surviver

 

[QuietChivalry]

Don't make me pick!!

They're both good in different respects.

Harry Potter would be better for a sweep into the world of what could be...the literary world where people spend hours wishing they would receive that goddamned letter.

LotR on the other hand is for when I want a timeless journey into the deep fable land, a moment where I can live a fairytale.

I love them both!

 

[mike_n_herrin]

"Lord of the Rings" far out distances Harry and the Potters...................Just my $0.02

I agree. I enjoy both sets of books a great deal, but i think LoTR was a richer story. Same with the movies.

 

[aadams990]

Lord of The Rings wins by far. Harry Potter is alright, but i've only watched one of those movies.

 

[yuty]

Apples and oranges. The only similarities between the two is the fantasy genre...

They have advantages and disadvantages over each other...

 

[Pushover]

LOTR has had a loyal following for several decades.......my money is on them.

 

[crakker_jakk]

the problem with the harry potter movies is they didn't find kids with talent..

 

[Padz]

J K Rowling doesn't play in the same league as J R R Tolkien. She's outclassed in the movies, and even more so in the books. Tolkien lords it over Rowling in every respect.