The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

TITANIC to be re-released in 3D by 2012

Oh brother, my heart will have to go on. This time can we see a real story about real passengers?
 
I don't buy this . . . Avatar was filmed with special cameras--I haven't heard of any technology to turn an old movie into 3D if it wasn't filmed in 3D--plus they haven't even put Titanic on blu-ray yet!!! I'll be happy if they get around to doing that by 2012.

And what is with this "director's cut"? Did the director not cut the movie the first time? Did they let the catering staff have a stab at it? I think it kind of cheapens a film when you publicly admit you can't decide how to edit it.
 
They are only doing this to push the sale of 3D TVs.

All the major movies are coming out in 3D, too.

But there is zero programming on TV for 3D. Hell, they are struggling to get it all in HD!

I think this fad will fade, or at the very least, simmer for quite a while until 3D TVs are A) cheaper B) better and C) have access to a wide variety of content.

BTW: did you know that you will have to get a new 3D capable Blu-Ray player to see the 3D movies? And the glasses are said to cost between $60-$200 each.

Ya. Right.

JasunStrikesBack said:
I'm proud to say I never saw that movie.
Click to expand...

You, sir, I envy!
 
Speeds said:
Are you serious? I thought by now, the entire world has seen this movie. It's been aired on TV for the thousandth' time.
Click to expand...

It's a great movie--it gets me everytime, the line at the end where they ask Rose her name and she says Rose Dawson, and then again at the end when she says that all that exists of him now is a memory--to think of that sexual raw young man, and that he was so full of life is carried only now like a thin wisp of a spider's web in her mind, yet the whole of his life is shown to us through that memory. His life is so fully dimensioned and then it ends just as a memory--I don't know, it just gets me, that something so raw and young and sexual as their young relationship with the bright warm yellow colors on the boat and that haunting music could carry on in her mind when she's shown so old and frail in the dark blue harsh light. That all that light could come from her, and her memory. Oh, it just gets me. It's like the first few hours of the movie are like your investment for the emotional release of the final 10 minutes.
 
onetwothreefour said:
I don't buy this . . . Avatar was filmed with special cameras--I haven't heard of any technology to turn an old movie into 3D if it wasn't filmed in 3D
Click to expand...

There is a company in California which specialises in 'artificial' 3D. They used computers to layer the movie.

Clash of the Titans was shot in 2D but was altered by the company for a 3D release and the same company will make Harry Potter 3D as well.

http://www.cinematical.com/2010/01/27/harry-potter-and-clash-of-the-titans-to-undergo-3d-conversio/

Just Google '3D conversion'. There are plenty of articles about it.
 
onetwothreefour said:
Avatar was filmed with special cameras--I haven't heard of any technology to turn an old movie into 3D if it wasn't filmed in 3D.
Click to expand...

To kinda go on what gsdx was saying, they did the same thing with The Nightmare Before Christmas, and Toy Story 1 and 2.

And yes, I saw all three movies in 3D. :corn:

EDIT: And I think it's completely UNnecessary to make Titanic a 3D movie.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf3PurIYc48"]YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKvPry6kJDE"]YouTube[/ame]
 
I like Titanic too, it's a classic. Kate Winslet is love as well.

Can't wait to see the ship go down in 3D either :P
 
I hope they will *finally* re-edit that glaring error of watching Rose's Mom climbing into the lifeboat *twice*.

It's always amazed me that NO one has ever caught that...

Maybe as a final step to the ultimate interactive experience... As Jack sinks into his watery grave they could dump buckets of ice water from the ceiling onto the audience below...

Good times.
 
Cameron wants to be the record holder once more, seeing as Alice in Wonderland took it from Avatar.

I don't think it'll be hugely successful though. As a casual fan, being a movie that I’ve seen countless times during its hype period, it no longer has any appeal to me. The movie industry has changed a lot since its initial release, that 3D isn’t enough of a change to make it current enough to peak my curiosity.
 
If they can do it 3D why can't they edit out the boring hetero love story plot between Winslet and Di caprio and replace them with a pair of hot gay bears and maybe throw in an orgy midway?
 
I loved Titanic and if you have seen anything in real 3D it will be pretty amazing. I'm not talking the cheap ass 3d glasses you get when you get to the theatre either.

Mark
 
onetwothreefour said:
And what is with this "director's cut"? Did the director not cut the movie the first time? Did they let the catering staff have a stab at it? I think it kind of cheapens a film when you publicly admit you can't decide how to edit it.
Click to expand...

Directors and studios are renowned for disagreeing over the final cut of a film. Usually studios want it trimmed because focus groups didn't like parts of it or thought it was too long, or they want a Hollywood ending instead of the original written ending (something like The Beach - in the novel, everyone is slaughtered; in the film, the hippies living there just go peacefully back home) etc etc.

So then you get a director's cut, exactly how s/he envisioned the film to look. IF you look at the extended cuts of the Lord of the Rings, you'll see it in full force - Return of the kind was about 3 and a half hours in cinemas but runs close to 4 and half on the extended cut. Likewise the 2001 Redux print of Apocalypse Now - 49 minutes longer than the 1979 original screening.

Jasun , Splatter - Titanic was good. I saw it only once about a week into it's 1997 run, and I thoroughly enjoyed it.

-d-
 
JasunStrikesBack said:
I'm proud to say I never saw that movie.
Click to expand...


applause.gif




-----

And in related news: A remake of Avatar has just been announced.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top