Well, I spent over an hour searching and only found 20 or so pics of uncut cocks where the foreskin wasn't being pulled back by a guy desperate to look cut. It took a while to eliminate all but the best 5, but, other than the top 2, it was quite easy deciding on the order of my 5 finalists. Weirdly, the uncut cocks look smaller on average than the cut ones. An optical illusion, maybe?
#5.
good colour and nice length, though not as long as the angle makes it look. It's also a little on the thin side, which makes it look longer. I'm not too keen on the way the foreskin flares out a little at the tip, and the way it curves slightly downward, but, other than that, it's a good clean-looking cock.
#4.
Fairly good shape and proportions, and possibly the tidiest foreskin opening of the bunch, though the opening looks off-center, and a little too tight. It's let down a bit by lack of girth and doesn't look particularly solid in this pic.
#3.
Another tight but very tidy foreskin. This is probably the longest of the top 5, but is a little thin. I'm also not too fond of the taper or long thin head, but the texture and colour are very clean and even, and the overall shape is okay.
#2.
This is more like what I think of when I think of a perfect uncut cock, except for a few tiny things that could be better. The foreskin opening looks a TINY bit busy. The head lacks a TINY bit of definition through the skin, which looks a little too thick, but that's really nit-picking. The curve and proportions are great.
#1.
Though beaten by #2 for curve - this one is really a little too straight - it has the same sort of ideal length for topping, and a better girth. The foreskin opening is neater, the head is more defined, the nice pale colour is just as even, but that pale colour and those veins give it a little extra something. The skin also looks thin enough to see every ripple as it slides over the shaft beneath.
#5.
good colour and nice length, though not as long as the angle makes it look. It's also a little on the thin side, which makes it look longer. I'm not too keen on the way the foreskin flares out a little at the tip, and the way it curves slightly downward, but, other than that, it's a good clean-looking cock.#4.
Fairly good shape and proportions, and possibly the tidiest foreskin opening of the bunch, though the opening looks off-center, and a little too tight. It's let down a bit by lack of girth and doesn't look particularly solid in this pic.#3.
Another tight but very tidy foreskin. This is probably the longest of the top 5, but is a little thin. I'm also not too fond of the taper or long thin head, but the texture and colour are very clean and even, and the overall shape is okay.#2.
This is more like what I think of when I think of a perfect uncut cock, except for a few tiny things that could be better. The foreskin opening looks a TINY bit busy. The head lacks a TINY bit of definition through the skin, which looks a little too thick, but that's really nit-picking. The curve and proportions are great.#1.
Though beaten by #2 for curve - this one is really a little too straight - it has the same sort of ideal length for topping, and a better girth. The foreskin opening is neater, the head is more defined, the nice pale colour is just as even, but that pale colour and those veins give it a little extra something. The skin also looks thin enough to see every ripple as it slides over the shaft beneath.
