The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Trump Administration removed Obama funding to fight White Extremism

Please explain (or at least provide an example).

Whites who object to the destruction of the white majority are likely to be called supremisists. Or who object to massive immigration for that purpose or having that effect. Or who object to the destruction of their historic statues. Or who object to anti-white discrimination.
 
^ Now, please explain what that has to do with "defensive opinions". Explain how they are defending their opinions with violence.
 
^ Now, please explain what that has to do with "defensive opinions". Explain how they are defending their opinions with violence.
I do not agree that the opinions include violence, but any political opinion can become involved in violence.
 
^ They were your words, not mine. We ask a question and you don't answer it. We ask again and now you don't even agree with yourself.

We need a scorecard to keep up with you sometimes.
 
At least one of the architects of this policy, the nazi Gorka, is now gone.
 
^ They were your words, not mine. We ask a question and you don't answer it. We ask again and now you don't even agree with yourself.

We need a scorecard to keep up with you sometimes.

As usual, you just do not understand. You want to equate supremacy with violence and I reject that association.
 
Whites who object to the destruction of the white majority are likely to be called supremisists. Or who object to massive immigration for that purpose or having that effect. Or who object to the destruction of their historic statues. Or who object to anti-white discrimination.

Supremisists? Srsly?

And so what you are saying is that whites who want to maintain a superior or supreme position over non-whites are going to be called white supremacists?

Quod erat demonstrandum.
 
Supremisists? Srsly?

And so what you are saying is that whites who want to maintain a superior or supreme position over non-whites are going to be called white supremacists?

Quod erat demonstrandum.

I was responding to opinterphs question how supremacy opinions could be defensive. What people in the history of the world have knowingly and willingly allowed their people and culture to be over run and subjugated?
 
I was responding to opinterphs question how supremacy opinions could be defensive. What people in the history of the world have knowingly and willingly allowed their people and culture to be over run and subjugated?

Wait...What? Isn't this false equivalency? Honestly.
 
As usual, you just do not understand. You want to equate supremacy with violence and I reject that association.

I'm not acquainting one with the other, but where the first goes, the second usually follows. I'm 65 years old. I've been understanding your 'movement' for virtually my entire life. It is as it always has been, and it will continue to be so as long as you and your buddies promote it and protect it.
 
I'm not acquainting one with the other, but where the first goes, the second usually follows. I'm 65 years old. I've been understanding your 'movement' for virtually my entire life. It is as it always has been, and it will continue to be so as long as you and your buddies promote it and protect it.

Hogwash. I am not a part of any such "movement".
 
You are part of a "culture."

The paradox is that the people who defeated the fascists and nazis in WWII are now being called fascist even though their attitudes have become much more tolerant. In 1940 the US was 90% white and few would have disputed that it was a white, Christian country, devoted to democracy. The Jim Crow laws and discrimination which existed then have been abolished and racism on the part of whites greatly reduced. Liberals now see democracy as "white supremacy", because whites are the majority, and wish to destroy the system with masses of immigration and abortion, creating a divisive hodgepodge.
Republicans are not nazis nor fascists and have changed from the WWII generation only in becoming more tolerant.
 
Back
Top