The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Trump contemplates ending press conferences

1. I assume you mean loans from Russians.

2. We haven't seen his tax returns so that we can judge.

3. I'm registered Republican. Only rarely vote for a Democrat.

No, I was responding to your suggestion of loans to Russians.#31
 
^ I am NOT missing the point. You are derailing yet again to make Trump the victim and the Democrats the perpetrators. Trump works for America. Not just the Democrats. And it's not just Democrats who will claim that Trump is a Russian puppet. There are millions and millions and millions of Americans who think the same thing, And every time Trump pulls another stupid stunt to delay finding the truth just makes it more and more suspicious. He can't be completely innocent when he acts so guilty.

By the way, do you even know that a majority of Americans disapprove of Trump's firing of Comey? That's over half of Americans in case you don't know what 'majority' means.

Why do you and your guru keep insisting that Ben is derailing threads with his differing opinions? Every fucking thread you two clowns make in C E & P is anti Tump, take a look. It's getting embarrassing. He won the election already, get over it. For fuck's sakes, you two are Canadian, remember? Your personal opinions mean shit. Give your opinions, sure, but get over it, it's over.
 
Why do you and your guru keep insisting that Ben is derailing threads with his differing opinions? Every fucking thread you two clowns make in C E & P is anti Tump, take a look. It's getting embarrassing. He won the election already, get over it. For fuck's sakes, you two are Canadian, remember? Your personal opinions mean shit. Give your opinions, sure, but get over it, it's over.

He does derail threads. His differing opinions don't matter if they don't pertain to the topics. And If their personal opinions means shit, then what does that say about you? You don't actually offer anything intelligent here. Just insults, conspiracy or blind loyalty to a POTUS, when you're Canadian, it doesn't even make sense for you have loyalty in someone like him unless you're as bigoted and asshatted as he is.

Please knock it with the "he won the election get over it", when it's far from that. Either fucking read the god damn posts or don't bother responding to them at all.
 
Why do you and your guru keep insisting that Ben is derailing threads with his differing opinions? Every fucking thread you two clowns make in C E & P is anti Tump, take a look. It's getting embarrassing. He won the election already, get over it. For fuck's sakes, you two are Canadian, remember? Your personal opinions mean shit. Give your opinions, sure, but get over it, it's over.

And once again, you are here to give an opinion on the posters and not the topic.

You have to stop doing this.

We've had to get your shit cleaned up in one thread last week. At some point, you need to get over your personal animus and stop derailing the threads as well.

While you might be happy to hide out below ground utterly oblivious.....those of us who are able to actually look outside our windows recognize that TrumpCo. presents an existential threat to Canadian interests and values as well as America's. And so we are entitled to discuss this.

But hey, tell us more about things that really matter. Like housecleaning.
 
Why do you and your guru keep insisting that Ben is derailing threads with his differing opinions?

It's very simple, Mikey. He derails any topic by trying to turn it into an 'I hate Democrats' discussion. Every time he mentions 'Democrats' or 'Obama' or 'Clinton', he's trying to derail the topic away from the horror that is Donald J. Trump.

See? it has nothing to do with differing opinions.
 
Could you give us a bit of a summary? (Subscription required to view it.)

I quote from the article:

"The president’s favorite apologist was at it again, devoting his hour-long show on Fox News Channel to a strange assortment of topics that had nothing to do with the blockbuster news on everyone else’s lips.

The top of Sean Hannity’s hour Monday night went to “why Comey had to go.” That took eons to fully explore and was mostly devoted to the evils of Hillary Clinton’s email practices.

The bottom of the hour was a pressing request to viewers to answer the question, “Do you think health care is a right or a privilege?”

But the most notable segment was his idea for reforming the White House news briefings by requiring journalists to choose among a dozen or more topics and submit written questions in advance. The White House could then pick those it liked and answer them after carefully crafting responses.

It’s a lousy idea under any circumstances, but with the situation that erupted Monday evening, after The Washington Post reported that Trump had shared classified information with Russian officials, it’s downright terrible.

Imagine Tuesday’s briefing — with a full international crisis brewing — being contained to a few mild topics chosen in advance by the White House to forward Trump’s agenda and cover the presidential backside. Important and serious questions abound, and open dialogue is required to answer them on behalf of the public.


That’s not what Hannity had in mind.

“First, the White House press team should regularly develop a list of the top and most important 15, 20, 25 issues of the day,” he said.

“Next, the media, well, they should be able to submit questions about these issues in writing, give the White House time to respond with clarity and specificity, and if Sean Spicer then wants to take a couple of questions from the briefing room podium, that’s fine. But only on those specific topics.”

This, Hannity claimed, would result in more “truth” and less “gotcha.”

He’s worried about the combined forces of bad media, the bad left, and weak Republicans causing “a clear and present danger” to President Trump. (Trump has both praised the briefings for their ratings and suggested that he’s too active and decisive a president for them to work effectively.)

Niels Lesniewski, who covers the Senate for Roll Call, reacted on Twitter to Hannity’s proposal: “Should an outlet that has a prime-time host who suggests this be allowed in the pool?”


Laura Ingraham, whose conservative Lifezette site is one of many new voices in the briefing room, wasn’t so sure about the details, she told Hannity. Her proposed tweak: There should be fewer preselected topics.

She called for “much shorter, succinct interactions with the press” and — in a logical leap — suggested that the White House beat reporters stop hanging around the White House so much.


“White House reporters should go out to the rest of the country,” she said. (Yes, and police-beat reporters should spend their work hours at the seashore.)

But Hannity, who’s known to have the president’s ear, is on to something — although he’s approaching it like the partisan fanboy he is, not a journalist or a democracy-minded citizen.

The White House news briefings are in a particularly sad state of affairs, and do need fixing.

We saw it last week when Sarah Huckabee Sanders, subbing for Sean Spicer, stated confidently that the president had fired Comey on the recommendation of the deputy attorney general — only to have the president say he had made the decision before that.

We saw it this week when Spicer deflected question after question about whether the White House has recordings of visitors.

But the answer isn’t written questions chosen from a preapproved menu, which sounds like something right out of an authoritarian handbook in a chapter titled “The Fine Art of Propaganda.”


Hope this helps ..|
 
And once again, you are here to give an opinion on the posters and not the topic.

You have to stop doing this.

We've had to get your shit cleaned up in one thread last week. At some point, you need to get over your personal animus and stop derailing the threads as well.

While you might be happy to hide out below ground utterly oblivious.....those of us who are able to actually look outside our windows recognize that TrumpCo. presents an existential threat to Canadian interests and values as well as America's. And so we are entitled to discuss this.

But hey, tell us more about things that really matter. Like housecleaning.

Look who's talking. When did you ever post a response without a personal attack?
 
Look who's talking. When did you ever post a response without a personal attack?

A lot less times than you've responded without trying to derail the threads.

What's your secret? Why do you get away with it so regularly?
 
Look who's talking. When did you ever post a response without a personal attack?


Oh Please.

The posters who feel the flick of the tip of my whip are invariably liars, racists, homophobes, and did I mention liars, racists and those who consistently try their best to destroy threads with derailments.

Like you. And Mikey.

Now. Back to topic because you're doing it again.
 
My roommate and I were chatting this afternoon and we came to the conclusion that, had this been written as a serious Hollywood script and sent around to all the studios, they would laugh and throw it back into the writer's face.
 
Back
Top