Trump might win !!!!

[eastofeden]

Question:
Facebook and tweeter has banned many people for undesirable comments correct ?
Why not banned Trump??

...because that would bring him more fans.....

They are painting themselves as anti establishment and any kind of censorship would "prove" that they are under attack. They already are imagining sabotage when Trump does a rotten job at the debates...it is everyone else's fault except the actual person at fault... which is TRUMP.....

Banning him would be giving him and his fans what they want..their wet dream....

 

[nsguy2]

Now this is interesting.

Donald Trump said that it was a great mistake to bomb Yugoslavia in 1999, and that Bill Clinton's administration "made a mess in the Balkans".

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2016&mm=10&dd=13&nav_id=99404

Interesting because one of the few things that could give Trump any chance at POTUS at this point is a terror attack. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if those bastards running the Trump campaign convinced him to do this in hopes of inciting some heinous act against the US.

 

[Zeno Lorea]

Don't understand estimate the voters.

The correct word is "missunderestimate". At least that's how George Bush used it.

 

[Kulindahr]

Does Trump have any real political experience? I know in a documentary about his 757 private jet on Discovery that he held up a flight just so he could watch a political debate, so I knew he was interested in politics, but has he ever held any kind of political office?

No, and that's the problem I was pointing out. We have two very corrupt people, but one actually has some experience at what she's running for. So either one will continue the destruction of the Republic in terms of corruption, but one will contribute to the destruction of the Republic by sheer idiotic incompetence. Were this an airplane and we were voting for pilot, the choice would be obvious because while neither is aiming for a good place to land, at least one will be able to fly without being likely to kill everyone on board.

 

[Kulindahr]

No, he's got no political experience, never held office, and has basically waffled back and forth on Party depending on who he thinks could benefit him.

I'm not even sure he has any experience in buying politicians, which would sort of qualify as political experience.

 

[Kulindahr]

^I believe that all political polarisation adds lustre to the debate now taking place across the United States, teaching us that freedom of speech is an essential ingredient in the development of the democratic ideal enabling the human person to benefit by ensuring that all potential political leaders are subject to the greatest scrutiny by their respective electorates.

Today the press has the announced the death of one of Western democracy's great commentators, whose artistic response to corruption, and incompetence in Italian politics has contributed enormously to the growth of questioning those who presume to lead us.

No, the polarization leads to people relying on sound bites for their political knowledge, which reduces the political IQ of the Republic substantially and ruins any chance of actually working together to get ahead. Far from demonstrating anything about free speech, it destroys free speech because free speech requires thought and sound-bite politics is the antithesis of thought.

 

[Kulindahr]

Now this is interesting.



http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2016&mm=10&dd=13&nav_id=99404

Interesting because one of the few things that could give Trump any chance at POTUS at this point is a terror attack. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if those bastards running the Trump campaign convinced him to do this in hopes of inciting some heinous act against the US.

The best hope for the GOP for a win would be a terror attack in which Trump was killed.

 

[Kulindahr]

The correct word is "missunderestimate". At least that's how George Bush used it.

Yes. And we all must beware the dangers of mere semimisunderestimating!

 

[Kabluey]

No, and that's the problem I was pointing out. We have two very corrupt people, but one actually has some experience at what she's running for. So either one will continue the destruction of the Republic in terms of corruption, but one will contribute to the destruction of the Republic by sheer idiotic incompetence. Were this an airplane and we were voting for pilot, the choice would be obvious because while neither is aiming for a good place to land, at least one will be able to fly without being likely to kill everyone on board.

Sounds like two party politics.

 

[Benvolio]

The correct word is "missunderestimate". At least that's how George Bush used it.

Wrong. The word he originated was " misremembered"; actually a valid concept and word.

 

[gsdx]

Wrong. The word he originated was " misremembered"; actually a valid concept and word.

Right, but he also said 'misunderestimate':

1. (1)(–) — Misunderestimate. Stated in the immediate aftermath of the disputed 2000 election: One of the first and perhaps most iconic Bushisms (Nov. 6, 2000).

You really should do some homework. http://www.languagemonitor.com/poli...sunderestimate-mission-accomplished-top-list/

 

[Telstra]

The correct word is "missunderestimate". At least that's how George Bush used it.

Oh i just noticed the error.
I should have wrote under estimate and not "understand estimate" LOL

 

[Telstra]

...because that would bring him more fans.....

They are painting themselves as anti establishment and any kind of censorship would "prove" that they are under attack. They already are imagining sabotage when Trump does a rotten job at the debates...it is everyone else's fault except the actual person at fault... which is TRUMP.....

Banning him would be giving him and his fans what they want..their wet dream....

debatable.
Banning him meaning he has no power over any website.
They have the power over him by banning him from using it.

 

[Kulindahr]

Sounds like two party politics.

It's one of four possible situations if we leave out corruption. We used to get both parties offering competent "pilots", and that was considered normal two-party politics; having one plainly incompetent is new.

 

[Kulindahr]

Right, but he also said 'misunderestimate':



You really should do some homework. http://www.languagemonitor.com/poli...sunderestimate-mission-accomplished-top-list/

"Misunderestimate" might be a valid concept, though I'm not sure how useful. It would indicate underestimating someone in a seriously less-than-reasonable direction, but functionally/practically I don't see how that would differ from more ordinary underestimating.

 

[Vitamin]

It's one of four possible situations if we leave out corruption. We used to get both parties offering competent "pilots", and that was considered normal two-party politics; having one plainly incompetent is new.

And this means our Republic is doomed, how?

Please don't tell me because of "corruption" that's been a feature since the birth of the country.

 

[Kyanimal]

Trump is looking at the Oval Office as though it is a controlling CEO's office. He has no understanding of the basis of our Constitution, the idea of the separation of powers, let alone Church and State.

He seems to believe that The President is somehow equal to King, which is precisely the opposite of the principles that the U.S. of A. was founded on.

Our Republic is one of the most bold experiments regarding humanity, the rights of individual citizens, and how WE choose to govern ourselves.

"The Donald" is seeking to control US by executive fiat. He doesn't "get" it! Most of us Know that! And yet ... yet ... given the design of our system, he might, just might, win this election!

May God, or whoever, a Higher Power, help us if we make the error of not helping ourselves, which we've fought so many wars to have the right to do!

If he wins, and he's all about Winning, no matter the consequences, I'm convinced that not only WE, but also The World will lose, and lose badly!

 

[NotHardUp1]

^I believe that all political polarisation adds lustre to the debate now taking place across the United States, teaching us that freedom of speech is an essential ingredient in the development of the democratic ideal enabling the human person to benefit by ensuring that all potential political leaders are subject to the greatest scrutiny by their respective electorates.

Sorry, but the spleen has just grown too bitter in this race. Rather than luster, I see it more as a smut like that which grows on corn.

 

[Kulindahr]

And this means our Republic is doomed, how?

Please don't tell me because of "corruption" that's been a feature since the birth of the country.

I give -- I spent most of a minute looking back and forth from what I said to your response, and I can't figure out what your question has to do with my post.

 

[Kulindahr]

Trump is looking at the Oval Office as though it is a controlling CEO's office. He has no understanding of the basis of our Constitution, the idea of the separation of powers, let alone Church and State.

He seems to believe that The President is somehow equal to King, which is precisely the opposite of the principles that the U.S. of A. was founded on.

Our Republic is one of the most bold experiments regarding humanity, the rights of individual citizens, and how WE choose to govern ourselves.

"The Donald" is seeking to control US by executive fiat. He doesn't "get" it! Most of us Know that! And yet ... yet ... given the design of our system, he might, just might, win this election!

May God, or whoever, a Higher Power, help us if we make the error of not helping ourselves, which we've fought so many wars to have the right to do!

If he wins, and he's all about Winning, no matter the consequences, I'm convinced that not only WE, but also The World will lose, and lose badly!

Well, the way that presidents increasingly ignore Congress and manipulate government to their preference by the use of executive orders he has good reason to think that way.