The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Trump this.

cityboy-stl said:
The walls are closing in now. No other accounting firm will touch the Trump organization now. This will lead to bankruptcy. But just watch, Trump and his fascist Nazi Reich-Wing news media flunkies and his fellow congressional seditionists, will be howling that they're the victim, while the ignorant, mindless minions will goosestep right behind them like good little brown shirts. Monsters and traitors and terrorists. All of them.
Click to expand...

It may take a little while longer.

There's a loophole in the campaign finance laws that allows potential candidates to create political action committes (PACs) and collect millions of dollars that they can spend on whatever they want. It's not until they declare their candidacy that the campaign law restrictions come into play. After Trump was inaugurated in 2017, he immediately announced his candidacy for 2020.

When he lost in 2020, he converted his campaign to a PAC which allows him to collect money but bypass campaign finance laws. He's not announcing for 2024 because someone has advised him of the loophole.

The PAC's filings indicate it has $122 million in the bank. That's oddly close the amount of money that the Trump Organization needs to pay its lenders. Hmmm.

He's also trying to collect money for admission to his little rallies (which is lowering attendance, as his supporters seem more inclined to watch the car crash that is Trump when it is free).

As a PAC, he's restricted to a maximum of $5,000 in cash contributions to each candidate. Other than giving $1 million to Mark Meadows' foundation, the PAC hasn't spent a lot of money. Where's the rest of the money going?
 
rareboy said:
feb-9-2022-letter-from-mazars-general-counsel-william-kelly-to-the-trump-organization-p2-large.gif


There's no question that Mazers must be desperate to get away from the stench of TrumpCo. I suspect that their other high wealth clients are terrified that it will lead to a wider investigation of Mazers' reports for other corporations where the same thing has been happening.

Love to know if the State cut Mazers any deal to have them bail and not try to defend their work?
Click to expand...

One has to wonder, how many of Mazers other, high profile clients pressured them into dropping the Donald, as they didn't want to be caught in any court or Federal investigation into their accounting practices [-X
 
^ This.

It is the same as Lindell's Bank...de-banking him because their other clients might have threatened to walk.
 
KaraBulut said:
Mar-A-Cloggo. :rotflmao:

Click to expand...

cityboy-stl said:
^ Hillary was right about everything.
Click to expand...
As terrible a candidate as she was, she was one of the MOST-HIGHLY-QUALIFIED nominees ever on any USA presidential ballot, certainly in modern history. (Ike was a pretty high general, so he'd be on the list, too.) Her personality is as cold as liquid helium, but the USA would have been almost infinitely better off under her - and there would have STILL been plenty of shortcomings; but what has happened because of D...ump is already catastrophic.

cityboy-stl said:
the ignorant, mindless [STRIKE]minions[/STRIKE] CULT MEMBERS will goosestep right behind them like good little brown shirts. Monsters and traitors and terrorists. All of them.

George Conway explains why he thinks Trump's accounting firm cutting ties is worse than impeachment [CNN]
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Fixed it for you.

George Conway IS absolutely right. With a compliant Senate, all that the sum total of the two impeachments meant, was a stern "Donnie, we really wish you hadn't done that." No more consequences than your mother telling you to sit in the corner for an hour. Yeah, this might be a little worse for him. Good - BRING IT ON!!!!!!!!!
 
frankfrank said:
As terrible a candidate as she was, she was one of the MOST-HIGHLY-QUALIFIED nominees ever on any USA presidential ballot, certainly in modern history. (Ike was a pretty high general, so he'd be on the list, too.) Her personality is as cold as liquid helium, but the USA would have been almost infinitely better off under her - and there would have STILL been plenty of shortcomings; but what has happened because of D...ump is already catastrophic.
Click to expand...
I hear people say that Hillary was a terrible candidate but why is it that we aren't saying, "Trump was a terrible candidate?". The man could never answer the question he was asked. He was as ill-prepared and ill-informed as Sarah Palin.

The things that he said and did during his campaign told us all exactly what kind of President we would be getting. During that entire campaign, we were constantly told, "Oh, he's just saying that. He would never do it.".

 
TX-Beau said:
Heh, The SC righties are such fucking cowards.
Click to expand...

Does that mean you think they should have taken up the case and drug it out for six months so the Jan 6 committee couldn't get the documents until later in the summer at the earliest?
 
274198997_2790166194610218_1901441349489845175_n.jpg


- - - Updated - - -

cityboy-stl said:
Does that mean you think they should have taken up the case and drug it out for six months so the Jan 6 committee couldn't get the documents until later in the summer at the earliest?
Click to expand...

No. They are probably clearing the way for someone smarter than Trump to finish what he failed to.
 
cityboy-stl said:
Does that mean you think they should have taken up the case and drug it out for six months so the Jan 6 committee couldn't get the documents until later in the summer at the earliest?
Click to expand...

No, they won't do that either. They've already demonstrated they can make a ruling with no arguments whatsoever; they are cowards because once again they won't MAKE a fucking decision one way or the other. They probably want to side with the toad (despite toad), and we all know the toad's case is bogus, but just like the Texas decision they just procedurally punt instead of either just being unconstitutional, or having to enforce the law explicitly.
 
TX-Beau said:
No, they won't do that either. They've already demonstrated they can make a ruling with no arguments whatsoever; they are cowards because once again they won't MAKE a fucking decision one way or the other. They probably want to side with the toad (despite toad), and we all know the toad's case is bogus, but just like the Texas decision they just procedurally punt instead of either just being unconstitutional, or having to enforce the law explicitly.
Click to expand...

They made their decision, by not taking the case up. They kicked the toad to the side of the road to no other outlet.
 
backagain said:
They made their decision, by not taking the case up. They kicked the toad to the side of the road to no other outlet.
Click to expand...

That's not what happened, if that was their intent, they would have taken it up, then decided adamantly against creating precedent. They DIDN'T give an opinion; they didn't say yes or no. The toad can revisit the issue, which would probably get the same reaction, because the court does not want to say no, and can't find a plausible legal justification to say yes.

If they liked to taod more, they would have protected him. He has only himself to blame.

....The case that was before the Supreme Court dealt with a specific set of documents being sought by the committee, meaning that Trump could still challenge other attempts to get information about his presidency that he wants to stay secret.
Click to expand...

From the above link

Here's the real answer they gave.
 
8-nick-anderson-counterpoint.jpg
 
I'm putting this her because it really is farce:

former President Trump lashed out at his former Attorney General Bill Barr on Friday, calling him "weak" and "ineffective" and accusing Barr of failing to do more to tackle Trump's baseless claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election...
Click to expand...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...was-weak-ineffective/ar-AAUD5q5?ocid=msedgntp

While Barr is busily trying to scrub the shit stain from his brown nose - the toad reacts like no one expected - RIGHT!

So, anyone know how many books are left to suffer through? I'm going to hold out for "Erik - the Inbred" or maybe Junior's "Why won't Daddy Love Me?"
 
Every now and then it's good to have a refresher/reminder of what bat shit crazy looks like:


roadrunner-meep-wile-e-coyote.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top