The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Trump this.

KaraBulut said:
Uh oh. Someone's been moo-nipulating the stock price! 🐄 🐮

Click to expand...
Nunes is such a whiny little baby la-la. But to his credit...he is managing to manipulate the price for now to keep the villagers from his door.

giphy.gif
 
Were you better off 4 years ago?

This was 4 years ago- 42 days into the COVID lockdowns. There were 880,112 cases and 50,114 deaths in the US. The US had over 25% of the 193,671 deaths that had been reported worldwide.


Dr Birx looks so much happier these days:

 
Last edited:
Birx doesn't deserve do-overs or excuses for that day in my opinion.

It was just one moment in her enabling a failed strategy for limiting COVID deaths and cases.

Granted, it was the moment when I think we all understood just exactly what a disaster the Trump strategy was and how it got that way.
 
Will the Supremes rule in favour of Trump?

He has to lose two conservative judges to lose the immunity challenge.

This case should never have gone to arguments. The fact that it has sets the stage for a Trump win in the courts and likely in November.

My suspicion is that the Court will rule in such a way that makes it clear that Trump has immunity but Biden and any other Democrat president does not in another Roberts' Court pretzel rulings.

 
News websites are having to create columnar timelines because Trump has two trials going on the same day.

This. Is. Not. Normal.

1714056552924.png
 
But now it is normal.

It is actually not unlike mass school shootings.

This all becomes normalized in no time at all. The old norms are shattered. Corruption, grift, graft and brutish behaviour are now the order of the day.
 
rareboy said:
Will the Supremes rule in favour of Trump?

He has to lose two conservative judges to lose the immunity challenge.

This case should never have gone to arguments. The fact that it has sets the stage for a Trump win in the courts and likely in November.

My suspicion is that the Court will rule in such a way that makes it clear that Trump has immunity but Biden and any other Democrat president does not in another Roberts' Court pretzel rulings.

Click to expand...
They are going to quibble; they will say that no, there is no absolute immunity, but there may be limited immunity. Then, they will send it back to the first court to apply whatever test they say has to be applied where it begins a new journey back up to them, pushing any trials down the road to at least spring 2025 at the very earliest.
 
rareboy said:
But now it is normal.

It is actually not unlike mass school shootings.

This all becomes normalized in no time at all. The old norms are shattered. Corruption, grift, graft and brutish behaviour are now the order of the day.
Click to expand...
Quod erat demonstrandum.

images.jpg
 
rareboy said:
But now it is normal.

It is actually not unlike mass school shootings.

This all becomes normalized in no time at all. The old norms are shattered. Corruption, grift, graft and brutish behaviour are now the order of the day.
Click to expand...
Toad is actually arguing in front of the SC that assassination may be covered under presidential privilege.

The level of despair just making that argument in the SC inspires is massive, not even mentioning the actual chance that the SC will agree.

I can't even...
 
Alito and Gorsuch seem to be in the bag for Trump. Their question about Presidents pardoning themselves pre-emptively is absurd.

Amy Coney Barett not so convinced by TrumpCo. arguments.
 
rareboy said:
Alito and Gorsuch seem to be in the bag for Trump. Their question about Presidents pardoning themselves pre-emptively is absurd.

Amy Coney Barett not so convinced by TrumpCo. arguments.
Click to expand...

This whole episode is absurd. Toad is trying to get the SC to say to the country that what Toad says is law, not the Constitution. The fact that any of them would agree is fucking depressing.
 
Also, they already know how they are going to vote.
 
TX-Beau said:
Also, they already know how they are going to vote.
Click to expand...
It's not the vote that we need to worry about. The problem would be if they spend the next 60 days crafting a means test to determine whether a Presidential action qualifies. That would be remanded back to the lower level courts and then start the whole appeals process over again.

The best thing that they could do is immediately lift the stay pending a final opinion and then avoid some Solomonic decision about what constitutes a "private" non-exempt action versus an "official" exempt action.
 
It is why I think that the Trump Court was already in the bag for him. But it will likely be a bare split decision so that some of the most morally troubled could vote against, knowing that the GOP majority will carry his water for him and don't give a shit about their future place in history because getting the White House for their owners is their only task.
 
Another appeal that failed today:

A federal judge on Thursday rejected Donald Trump's bid to throw out a $83.3 million defamation verdict in favor of the writer E. Jean Carroll, who said the former U.S. president defamed her after she accused him of raping her decades ago.
U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan in Manhattan said Trump was not entitled to a new trial, or judgment as a matter of law.
Click to expand...
 
BTW...DJT stock traded up over $38 because Nunes whined to the GOP House.

Why the fuck this adds any value to the company, I have no idea...but I still see a lot of tiny trades of under 50 shares.

So Bubba and Ma must be purdy confident that this is what will make them rich.
 
Let's say... there's this- hypothetical- President with orange makeup and orange hair who- hypothetically- doesn't want to leave the White House after he- hypothetically- lost an election and he- hypothetically- decides to stage a coup to- hypothetically- prevent his successor from taking office...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top