The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Trump to Rescind Protection for Trans Students

By the way.

This thread was about the removal of protection for students.


[Text: Removed]

Actually, it is about removing the forcing of me to have someone use the bathroom with me with whom I am not comfortable, as it has been for, like, at least a thousand years.

I need my safe space. You are taking it away.
 
[Text: Removed]

Actually, it is about removing the forcing of me to have someone use the bathroom with me with whom I am not comfortable, as it has been for, like, at least a thousand years.

I need my safe space. You are taking it away.

It has never been that way, there is no aspect of law that protects you from being uncomfortable in a public place. There are men who make me uncomfortable being around but I have to put up with them in the public bathroom just like everyone else. In high school there were bullies and others in my gym class I was extremely uncomfortable being a room with. I had no recourse about that. Some of them suspected me of being gay which is why they bullied me, and i would guess they were uncomfortable being around me but they had no recourse either unless they were going to be absent from gym.
 
[Quoted Post: Removed]

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/0...oesnt-want-to-see-a-penis-in-the-locker-room/

There's this thing called underwear, perhaps you've heard of it. And towels. You have possibly seen shower curtains in your many years as well? Let us all hope that it's been so. You are probably also unaware that locker rooms contain toilets and stalls with doors, in which many a teenager has crawled into their gym clothes.

If grown men gave a shit what 12yr old girls actually wanted then they wouldn't be changing in front of their peers in the first place so I doubt many teenagers believe said grown men actually have their best interests at heart in the 'undressing' and 'clothing choices' arena; particularly when they've watched you interact with such 'care' about it in the rest of the world. Makes the screeching of "I give a damn!" from your end sound like a leaky balloon.
 
Moderator Notice

Posts in this thread that relate to the original topic (President Trump’s revocation of Obama rules on bathrooms for transgender students) will remain in this thread.

Posts that relate to gender identity and the bathroom usage controversy (for non-students) in other public settings will be moved to a separate thread.


 
I would note that a number of jurisdictions and schools have allowed transgender students to use the bathroom that matches their sexual identity while all this debate has been going on.

As of July 2016, there were 21 states and 225 jurisdictions that that prohibit discrimination based on gender identity in either employment, housing, and/or public accommodations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_rights_in_the_United_States

It is good to keep in mind that just because the religious conservative right wing wants to punish and humiliate transgender kids...it is not universal.
 
Re: Moderator Notice

After a flicker of some respect for Betsy DeVos for opposing the lifting of the Obama protection....it began to evaporate when we saw her cave to Jeff Sessions and of course, is now wholly gone as she parroted the party line at CPAC.

Mealy mouthed. Spineless.

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/betsy-devoss-spineless-transgender-bathroom-politics

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...os-obama-transgender-bathroom-rules/98309012/

But I guess since she's only put in place to shut down or destroy the DEA...why should anyone be surprised.
 
And it is good to keep in mind that in the real world the majority of what I see, people don't have an issue with sharing bathrooms. The only issue people seem to have is how these bathroom adjustments have been implemented rather then who these people have to share them with. Again, because these people are adults with no hang ups who just want to use the bathroom and don't care about who is using them, they just want to relieve themselves.
 
I would note that a number of jurisdictions and schools have allowed transgender students to use the bathroom that matches their sexual identity while all this debate has been going on.

As of July 2016, there were 21 states and 225 jurisdictions that that prohibit discrimination based on gender identity in either employment, housing, and/or public accommodations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_rights_in_the_United_States

It is good to keep in mind that just because the religious conservative right wing wants to punish and humiliate transgender kids...it is not universal.

It is a decision to be made at the state or local level, and not within the jurisciction of Obama the dictator.
 
Just like Jim Crow laws were states rights decisions?

Or homo marriage should be a states right?

Any citizen of the US should be entitled to the same degree of protection and equal rights whether they are visiting Bumfuck, Kentucky or NoseBleed, Colorado.

Every student in a federally funded school should be afforded the blanket protection of the federal government in every state and territory.

And let us remember here. Obama didn't start this.

It was a couple of states that wanted to get back at lgbt for equal marriage and rammed through a toilet law that actually was in conflict with the policies of universities. Obama was just stepping in to make sure that the contagion wouldn't infect the lives of young trans students in need of legal protection against the pitchfork wielding religious fascists trying to cram their transphobia down everyone else's throat.
 
Benvolios logic is if Democrats do it, it is wrong and if Republicans do it, it's okay. Even if it goes against his "core" beliefs, I say core in quotes because it is obvious he changes these based on convenience.
 

The court should hold that bathroom assignment based upon sexual/biological/anatomical identity is permissible under the law and is at keast as valid as "gender" identity, if not more so. As a judge I would ask the question: do you claim that trans people are entitled to use the showers of their gender identity. Notice that one propostion claims that safety and privacy to thr majority do not justify the classification. Thst is a very bad argument but it only an amicus cruiae brief.
I would expect the court to split on party lines, so the school board will win by default if Gorsuch or a another republican is not on the court or a decision if he is.
 
Re: General Controversy Involving Gender Identity and Use of Public Bathrooms [SPLIT]

Whether or not one believes that a student who believes himself or herself to be transgender should be allowed to choose the restroom of his or her choice, the Obama administration erred in arguing that Title IX mandated it. If Congress chooses to do so through further legislation it can do so. It hasn't. The Trump administration has acted correctly in rescinding the Obama administration recommendation. The following video is an interview with a member of the Civil Rights Commission:

- - - Updated - - -

http://www.wsj.com/video/opinion-jo...nic/D22D0838-040A-4107-83B5-E7A0EFC638E7.html
 
Thanks Johann

C5iL2fzU8AAaWeG.jpg
 
The court should hold that bathroom assignment based upon sexual/biological/anatomical identity is permissible under the law and is at keast as valid as "gender" identity, if not more so. As a judge I would ask the question: do you claim that trans people are entitled to use the showers of their gender identity. Notice that one propostion claims that safety and privacy to thr majority do not justify the classification. Thst is a very bad argument but it only an amicus cruiae brief.
I would expect the court to split on party lines, so the school board will win by default if Gorsuch or a another republican is not on the court or a decision if he is.

Always with the fucking showers.
 
Back
Top