B
blackbeltninja
Guest
Hey guys
Hoping someone can give me some advice here.
I recently built a machine at home - sourced some decent ram, a good cpu and a decent board and gfx card. Put it all together and voila! Result. I was quite pleased with it. I then put together a second machine for my sister. Her budget wasn't as big as mine but I still got her some good stuff.
Having had the two machines running side by side, hers seems much more nimble than mine and I'm not sure why. Windows starts up and gets to desktop much quicker than mine does and seems to shut down faster; additionally, basic programmes like Firefox and Thunderbird seem to start faster on hers than mine. Additionally, someone at my office purchased a new machine which also seems significantly faster than mine even though our specs are similar.
Our installations are identical since I used my office XP install cds as part of my licence agreement for all the installations; same virus scanner; everything. Is it a basic difference between the 2 boards, that the Intel boards just respond more quickly than the MSI board? If yes, is there any way to tweak the MSI board or am I living in a fantasy world? I can see the MSI board takes longer to fire up after the POST; but even after the Windows logo appears on the systems and that little progress bar spins up and down underneath it, there are differences - mine does 9 spins; my sister's does 5 and the one at work does only 4 before bringing up a Windows login.
My specs:
MSI board G43-M2F; Intel G43/ICH10 chipset; 1333MHz fsb
1 x 2Gb ram 800MHz
Intel E8400 3GHz Core-2 duo 6Mb cache
Her specs:
Intel board DG35EC; Intel G35/ICH8 chipset; 1333MHz fsb
1 x 2Gb ram 800MHz (identical to mine)
Intel E5300 2.66GHz dual-core Pentium 2Mb cache
Office machine specs:
Same as mine, but an Intel DQ45QC board;with Intel Q45/ICH10 chipset
It's probably nothing serious; I'm just wondering why I spent significantly more money on a machine which seems significantly less powerful for simple things like Firefox and email. I don't plan on overclocking the machine; I'm wondering if perhaps there is another way around this since the faster chip in my system doesn't seem noticeably better than her one, so overclocking probably won't change that.
In short - is there a way to make my uber supercomputer behave like it should?
-d-
Hoping someone can give me some advice here.
I recently built a machine at home - sourced some decent ram, a good cpu and a decent board and gfx card. Put it all together and voila! Result. I was quite pleased with it. I then put together a second machine for my sister. Her budget wasn't as big as mine but I still got her some good stuff.
Having had the two machines running side by side, hers seems much more nimble than mine and I'm not sure why. Windows starts up and gets to desktop much quicker than mine does and seems to shut down faster; additionally, basic programmes like Firefox and Thunderbird seem to start faster on hers than mine. Additionally, someone at my office purchased a new machine which also seems significantly faster than mine even though our specs are similar.
Our installations are identical since I used my office XP install cds as part of my licence agreement for all the installations; same virus scanner; everything. Is it a basic difference between the 2 boards, that the Intel boards just respond more quickly than the MSI board? If yes, is there any way to tweak the MSI board or am I living in a fantasy world? I can see the MSI board takes longer to fire up after the POST; but even after the Windows logo appears on the systems and that little progress bar spins up and down underneath it, there are differences - mine does 9 spins; my sister's does 5 and the one at work does only 4 before bringing up a Windows login.
My specs:
MSI board G43-M2F; Intel G43/ICH10 chipset; 1333MHz fsb
1 x 2Gb ram 800MHz
Intel E8400 3GHz Core-2 duo 6Mb cache
Her specs:
Intel board DG35EC; Intel G35/ICH8 chipset; 1333MHz fsb
1 x 2Gb ram 800MHz (identical to mine)
Intel E5300 2.66GHz dual-core Pentium 2Mb cache
Office machine specs:
Same as mine, but an Intel DQ45QC board;with Intel Q45/ICH10 chipset
It's probably nothing serious; I'm just wondering why I spent significantly more money on a machine which seems significantly less powerful for simple things like Firefox and email. I don't plan on overclocking the machine; I'm wondering if perhaps there is another way around this since the faster chip in my system doesn't seem noticeably better than her one, so overclocking probably won't change that.
In short - is there a way to make my uber supercomputer behave like it should?
-d-









