Yeah I totally agree. I get turned off by uncut guys - and there isn't a single picture on my comp of an uncut guy, well maybe one or two, but I always skip over them. I too would much prefer to be with someone who's cut. I just think they are soo ugly, and I'm glad I got rid of my foreskin! To each their own though! Different strokes for differenent folks!
Now I have nothing at all against uncut guys as I see so many HOT uncut guys but I have always been turned off by uncut cocks and cannot ever see myself with a guy that is not cut. I even tend to skip over 80% of pics and videos of uncut guys as I just do not find all that extra skin attractive.
Well guess what? I'm quite the opposite, I tend to be skipping through 95% of the regular American porn where guys are typically circumcised, young, and white. I'm sure many Europeans feel the same way - that a cut cock, is, for lack of a better word,
weird. Now unfortunately I had a post that was deleted because I used some bad language that apparently just isn't acceptable for a safe discussion where people talk about how one cock is better than the other
To cut to the chase and the jist of my original post: people who are circumcised often have no say on what is better and what is no.
People are usually cut for 4 reasons:
1. They wanted it done. <-- meaning, they were biased for the operation to begin with. no one spends money, time, and a load of pain if they weren't psychologically dispositioned for cut dicks to begin with.
2. They had no choice in the matter. <-- meaning, they have absolutely no say on what is better, considering they never had one to begin with. you can't say American food is the best food in the world if you never tasted anything else. You also can't miss what you never had (though you can certainly dream), and never give hypotheses on what would 'have happened' if you were left uncut. Case in point: That is absolutely incorrect and fallacious, and a dubious claim with no merit.
3. They had it done for medical reasons. <-- meaning, their foreskin didn't work or had problems to begin with. And why would anyone enjoy a broken foreskin - this naturally makes them pro-circumcision if they had an operation that got rid of a problem. They have no right to say "they experienced both sides" because really, they didn't - often most are attention queens looking for well, attention, even if their validity for making a claim is moot.
4. It was a requirement of a religion. <-- meaning, they never valued their foreskin to begin with.
5. They were forced by external peers/pressure. <-- meaning, they have a very shallow lover/group of friends, and need to find new people that don't make them feel insecure. Any person that falls victim to social pressures is by nature, insecure.
Maybe I have been too harsh on this subject. I don't see myself ever not dating someone because they were uncut. Thats just rediculous. But - if I could "build" my dream boy (you know like you go online and build a car) you'd better believe I'd choose cut!
For the last 1900 years since the birth of Christ, the definition of a man was anatomically, uncircumcised. Sorry to burst your bubble, but if you look at any classical art, males are depicted as uncircumcised. Look at what is regarded as the epitome of neoclassic male aesthetics - Michaelangelo's David, and look at his penis.
You should be questioning your own positionality in society, and how your own cultural aesthetics are socially constructed. It is not normal, I dare say, for a person to prefer something that is not natural. How many straight men do you see go around asking their wives to get labiaplasty for their meat curtains, breast enhancements for bigger tits, and plastic surgery for smaller noses? Why stop there? Why don't parents start to choose the hair/eyes/sex of their children, so that they come up with the "perfect" child?
And of course, this leads to you as the individual promoting this argument - exposing your own insecurity. And most likely, this insecurity arising from growing up uncut in a country where most men have been cut (for the last half century, at that). Now there is nothing wrong with you having an inferiority complex, but I am in absolute opposition to you compelling other readers of being part of an infectious inferiority complex.
