The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

What did they find at Grand Canyon?

I see all kinds of videos on youtube about Egyptian cities and stuff with Graham Hancock and Micio Kaku...

What did they -supposedly- find?
 

 
Graham Hancock is fond of attributing cataclysms to solar flares and plasma waves, supposedly splitting stones in the ancient world. I recently encounters a commenter on YouTube claiming the Grand Canyon was made by a solar flare.

Riiiiiiight.
 


The site is a horrible clickbait Mecca. In the About page, the site fails to identify anyone who is the owner or creator of the content. It's just an endless amalgam of assorted hint and allusions and speculations, with Egyptian hieroglyphics sprinkled about randomly with no connection.

I sat through the entire video about the canyon and sure enough, not a single damned thing was shocking and certainly not anything that could be construest as "scaring" scientists.

Numerous other videos claimed other shocking discoveries, and used pictures of figures that neve appear in the videos. Pure click bait.
 
Graham Hancock is a peddler of bulshit woo woo science.
He's like the 'Bad Hair Ancient Aliens Guy' but with a better accent.

His Books are shit...and he is NOT an archaeologist.
 
He has never claimed to be.

Since he began, more and more very prehistoric ruins have been discovered. I'm sure he is on to something.
The fallacy is that there is some huge something hidden.

No. It's archaeology. The discipline is in a constant state of discovery and expansion. When the Euphrates dries and a new ruin and tunnel maze is discovered, it's not earthshattering. We know that civilizations and cities are buried by aeons of sedimentation.

The earlier views of how recently "civilizations" developed were inherently limited by the relative few archeology sites. There have been multiple discoveries in the Americas and adjacent islands that point to a much older occupation by humans, and possibly a cultural extinction predating the ice age inhabitants. The concept of epochs and restarting indeed seems to apply to human development.

We know that there are ruins offshore that must exist because sea levels rose dramatically in the past few thousand years.

Hancock exaggerates the normal status quo resistance to unproven speculation as some dark, sinister opposition to truth, when the reality is that it's just the tedious pace of institutional change. Academia doesn't leap forward. The scientific method means theories are built slowly, tested, and eventually accepted.

Conjuring massive events, like solar flare strikes, and opining about them being responsible for prehistoric or historic events, is tale-telling. Razzmatazz.

I first encountered his name when researching the Younger Dryas Event. He dabbled in dazzle.

To the degree his drama encourages people to conceive the possible, good. To the extend he fosters and encourages conspiracy theory or non-specific paranoia, not so good.
 
Graham Hancock is fond of attributing cataclysms to solar flares and plasma waves, supposedly splitting stones in the ancient world. I recently encounters a commenter on YouTube claiming the Grand Canyon was made by a solar flare.

Riiiiiiight.
I've never heard of Graham Hancock. But just so you know , it is a well known technique by the ancients to heat up a big boulders and then throw water on them for temperature shock to break up big boulders so they could be moved. You can do it yourself if you want to try it out. No need for ancient aliens or the apocalypse.
 
it is a well known technique by the ancients to heat up a big boulders and then throw water on them for temperature shock to break up big boulders so they could be moved.

I'm picturing you doing this as an 11-year-old. ;)
 
BTW;

I've seen that technique applied in pornos with hot candle wax and ice cubes. The guys did indeed get their rocks off.
 
I'm picturing you doing this as an 11-year-old. ;)
I'm just saying. Too many people want to jump on the bandwagon of labeling everything as conspiracy theory. It is a fact that the ancients weren't idiots. Breaking up big rocks with thermo shock was a well known technique. Don't need to deny that part of history or label it as ancient alien tech.
 
Oh, I understand. Not to worry.

I still have a picture in my head of 11-year-old Dominus learning about this and trying it out himself, and it works.
 
I've never heard of Graham Hancock. But just so you know , it is a well known technique by the ancients to heat up a big boulders and then throw water on them for temperature shock to break up big boulders so they could be moved. You can do it yourself if you want to try it out. No need for ancient aliens or the apocalypse.
He referred to cut stones in ancient buildings, damaged after construction. Woo-woo is an excellent epithet.
 
Back
Top