what do gay guys call buttholes?

[None124]

Bussy, you can guess what two words that comes from

 

[biguy732]

Years ago I've heard 'rosebud'. Don't know if it's still used.

There is a thread in the kink section about "rosebuds" - but be forewarned about some of the pictures in there....
It ain't about gardening - let's just say that.

 

[minion920]

is it just me or do these all sound really disgusting? then again if I was a girl I probably wouldn't want to be hearing anything about my "furburger" either...

No, it's not just you. they're all really bad especially "Poop Chute". and Mussy? WTF!!! I like to call it ; The Love Tunnel.

 

[RoscoR]

Here in the uk ... the council gritter LOL

 

[bulge]

As a matter of a fact there is only a minority of gay guys into ass sex (according to some statistics, not even a third), which probably explains there are so very few names for it.

 

[Kirbster66]

As a matter of a fact there is only a minority of gay guys into ass sex (according to some statistics, not even a third), which probably explains there are so very few names for it.

Where on earth did you hear that? That has in no way been my experience whatsoever. It's more of an anomoly to find someone NOT into anal.

 

[CaptainJohn]

Republicans

I was going to say the Bush administration, buy I think yours is better.

 

[CaptainJohn]

Very disappointing, I think I was hoping to hear some "secret" gay name for it or something, its a similar feeling to when I ask black people to tell me white people jokes and they say there aren't any.

says a lot about white people and straight guys, doesn't it?

Says a lot about white straight guys, I'd say.

 

[monkey91]

chocolate starfish =]

 

[JasunStrikesBack]

Yeah, I mean the only terms of bung hole that I've heard that are "gay specific" are really just jokes.

"Boy Pussy"
"Mangina"
"Hole to Heaven"

and what I call the ass holes of men who claim to be straight "where I'm going to stick my dick once you get drunk enough."

But none that we use.

Although what I DO see gay men do a bit more is straight men refer to women as a body part... "I'm going to go get some pussy." "I wanna fuck some pussy."

We tend to be more focused on the guy.. "I really need to fuck some dude's ass" or "I really need to find a guy to take my dick."

that kind of thing.

That being said, the BIGGEST difference is that straight people don't assign the "fucker" and the "fucked."

It happens a lot that straight guys will talk about how "that girl fucked me" which always makes me giggle since in the gay world, "getting fucked" means taking it and "fucking" means giving it.

Oh... and I've only ever heard straight people use the terms "pitcher and catcher" for gay guys... go figure.

 

[mike_n_herrin]

i've heard "fuckhole" but i guess that could be used for women also.

 

[fabulouslyghetto]

Bussy, boy pussy, boygina, heaven hole, cakes (cakes actually = butt cheeks), take your pick.

 

[Nominated]

Disneyland

 

[bulge]

Where on earth did you hear that? That has in no way been my experience whatsoever. It's more of an anomoly to find someone NOT into anal.

Many even speak of only 15% (see sexual practices in the following link).

http://www.solarnavigator.net/animal_kingdom/humans/homosexuality.htm

Anal penetration among gay men was much lower before the AIDS-campaigns started. The AIDS-campaigns have to focus so dramatically on anal penetration the anal penetration figures among men dramatically increased. If AIDS would come to an end, there will be a dramatical downfall of anal penetration among men.

Anal penetration is a str8 fantasy of gay sex.

Most of the guys I knew were not into anal sex at all, even abhorred it. Younger guys are more into anal sex because they have learned to format gay behaviour after str8 behaviour (worst learning ever). They are completely intoxicated by the "analisation" of gay sex by AIDS-campaigns

 

[thrive]

Personally I don't call it anything in particular. Mangina, boy pussy, etc. are just plain corny to me lol Usually I just say, I want some ass or booty.

 

[bulge]

Whoever wrote that website clearly has no understanding of homosexuality. How the hell the came to those conclusions is beyond me. And, no we did not format our behaviours on those that are straight. Those are some far stretching conclusions that based on some pretty bizarre distortions.

And as to what gay guys call buttholes we call them just that. We have no need to make the word all pretty and frilly. It is an asshole.

Where is that website wrong? I even think it is still lower than 15% as there is much more male-to-male action going on which mostly is not labelled gay, as a great majority of men restrict gay sex to anal penetration. You cann't imagine how many pettings I had with str8 guys who didn't consider it as gay at all as there had been no penetration.

http://www.ucalgary.ca/~ptrembla/ho...struction/a2-homosexuality-common-to-rare.htm


The only behaviour gay men don't mimic from str8s, is str8s don't "out" themselves.

 

[Kirbster66]

I can imagine that several of you have limited gay sex/gay life experience. Anal sex is a major part of gay sex...always has been, always will be. Penetrative sex has always been primary for males since prehistory.

 

[Kirbster66]

i am not saying that anal sex does not play a role i am saying that there is more to gay sex than anal sex. it would be like saying straight people use only the missionary position or something like taht.

I don't disagree with that, but someone saying only 15% of gays participate in anal sex and most calling it abhorrent is beyond ridiculous.

 

[bulge]

because i doubt the validity of the study. considering that one of my major research focuses in academia is human sexuality i do not see how they can possibly draw that conclusion. if you really wanted to get some insight perhaps you put a poll up and see the responses that you get in this forum alone. granted it would not meet strict scientific standards but it would show a different picture that this "study' presents. Perhaps I will go back and look at there research methods, but as I recall they did not go into enough detail on how the complied the research for anyone to draw any kind of conclusive decision. it seems to be nothing more than a subjective use of stereotypes.

I will never whatsoever believe what academia says about being male-to-male sex. All their results are obtained in homophobic societies, thus totally biased. You could only obtain good results in societies without the present kind of homophobia, for instance the ancient Greek society or Roman society.

http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/weekly/aa011500a.htm

When you even can'nt (which is the case in our societies) determine how many guys are into male-to-male sex or desire it, all results are biased and will remain biased forever. Even using strict scientific standards is an illusion. You cann't obtain any correct results in our kind of homophobic societies.

 

[CudDULL]

mangina sounds gross to me lol