On Topic Discussion What do you think about bisexuals?

[otters]

I will say that I'm entirely against 'gay for pay.'

(Only because it's just a euphemism for "bisexual prostitute".)

still not clear… are you against the actual sex workers, or against the term?

 

[mikemizanin729]

^^ I doubt he's against them. It's like anything really people scream phobia when there's not phobia there. Live and let live.

 

[otters]

I know you're not talking to me. You just said "no" to Mouf. (Who doesn't?)

The use of "^" implies that your are responding to the last post.

"^^" Implies the post above last.

"^^^" Means you are lazy.

"^^^^" Is too much. That's when you utilize the quote function.

Simple, simple, simple. Just like you.

dissenting opinion: ^^ is a smiley

 

[mikemizanin729]

I know you're not talking to me. You just said "no" to Mouf. (Who doesn't?)

The use of "^" implies that your are responding to the last post.

"^^" Implies the post above last.

"^^^" Means you are lazy.

"^^^^" Is too much. That's when you utilize the quote function.

Simple, simple, simple. Just like you.

 

[mikemizanin729]

Start a thread they others will love it.

Native aka Daximus.

 

[otters]

Is that you Native Son ?

aaaah, a reincarnation ^^

 

[mikemizanin729]

Whatever, newbie.

If this is your pathetic attempt to make a random attack go ahead. Newbies rarely post in HT as they're unfamiliar with the posts.

I would call you a newbie, but we all know that's not true instead I will just call you boring.

 

[otters]

If this is your pathetic attempt to make a random attack go ahead. Newbies rarely post in HT as they're unfamiliar with the posts.

I would call you a newbie, but we all know that's not true instead I will just call you boring.

is that so ^^

 

[LAPan75]

I think Bisexuals are the predominate Sexual designation of humans.
If Gay and Straight are the extremes, that means they are the rarest....
Thus Bisexual being their median, it must be the greater majority of the population.​

 

[otters]

i think bisexuals are the predominate sexual designation of humans.
if gay and straight are the extremes, that means they are the rarest....
Thus bisexual being their median, it must be the greater majority of the population.​

finally! A gaussian distribution :d

 

[nyctopgam]

If they are cool with their bisexuality I have had no problems with them. If they are fucked up they are too much trouble.

So I usually avoid hooking up them as they are often a waste of time and boring. There are more than enough homos out there.

 

[dereperez]

I think Bisexuals are the predominate Sexual designation of humans.
If Gay and Straight are the extremes, that means they are the rarest....
Thus Bisexual being their median, it must be the greater majority of the population.​

How I wish...

 

[pat grimshaw]

My friend Douggie doesn't call himself bisexual. He calls himself 'someone who gets pleasure from a variety of sources'.

I admit I trust him as much as most of you here trust the "bisexuals" but it doesn't matter much to me because I won't be marrying him.

 

[nycguydowntown]

No such thing as a 50/50 bisexual--there are str's who will dabble in same sex encounters and gays who will dabble in opposite sex encounters depending on their emotional standing at the moment---or their age---or their open mindedness--or their horniness---or many other circumstances.

 

[cgymike]

Even Kinsey didn't use a bell curve.

 

[Stardreamer]

I heard one commentator speculate years ago that most people are bi-sexual. He was basing that on all interest, not just sexual, in orientation. His view was the gay person who gets violently ill if they are even touched by a woman and the straight man who reacts the same to a male are the only true 100% gay or straight. A true straight guy doesn't have 'bros' or male friends in other words. Everyone else is some degree in between with most congregating around the straight end of the spectrum.

 

[MoufOfKhaos]

I don't know why i'd have to get "violently" ill at the thought of seeing tits and vagina to be classified as 100% foolproof perfectly grade A+ gay.

I think the speculator is stupid, is what i'm getting at. I don't get sexually aroused by women. I get sexually aroused by men. It begins and ends there.

 

[peeonme]

I heard one commentator speculate years ago that most people are bi-sexual. He was basing that on all interest, not just sexual, in orientation. His view was the gay person who gets violently ill if they are even touched by a woman and the straight man who reacts the same to a male are the only true 100% gay or straight. A true straight guy doesn't have 'bros' or male friends in other words. Everyone else is some degree in between with most congregating around the straight end of the spectrum.

I think violently ill is an over kill, perhaps uncomfortable would be more realistic, after all we see athletes do the pat on the ass thing, I think that most of them are st8, but we never know. Point is I have yet to see one puke when patted.
I also think that most congregate toward the middle but on the str8 side.

 

[Kulindahr]

I don't know why i'd have to get "violently" ill at the thought of seeing tits and vagina to be classified as 100% foolproof perfectly grade A+ gay.

Good point. If those seem just like another bit of scenery -- rock, tree, tits, cat, cow, bird, vagina, stump, phone booth, utility pole -- that would be sufficient.

Heck, I've known straight guys who find large breasts disgusting -- how's that fit on this supposed scale?

 

[otters]

Heck, I've known straight guys who find large breasts disgusting -- how's that fit on this supposed scale?

«disgusting» might be an exaggeration, but being unimpressed/uninterested is absolutely not uncommon, and I'm quite sure there's a sufficient biological/Darwinian explanation for it; I'd say: nature has programmed that «large» is interpretable as «these breasts are producing milk ATM», and that again means that the chance to impregnate her are minimised, and so it's rather natural to be uninterested.