The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

what does foreskin feel like?

greekdude

Slut
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Posts
223
Reaction score
1
Points
16
Foreskin has alot of nerve endings that are lost when one gets circumsized. A friend of mine who got cut when he was in college told me he lost some sensation after being circumsized, and regretted it afterwards. But if you had it cut since you were an infant, you won't notice any difference.
 
I've been told that the sensations from the foreskin slipping back and forth over the head are sensational (pun intended). I believe it because I can stretch the skin on my erection up over the head just a little, and it IS good!
 
mate, its the best part of my body, and i wouldnt cut it for anything. sometimes i wish it was shorter (it covers some 80% of the head even when erect) and retract itself on its own.
the feeling is great, just retracting it, not to say what wanking is like.
btw, how do you wank, without foreskin?
 
If you have it you don't really notice it, if you don't, don't worry about it.
 
just from an outsiders perspective i think foreskin is the softest thing ive ever felt.
 
thei06 said:
btw, how do you wank, without foreskin?
With lubrication! You can still do it by just moving the skin; you just don't get as much movement. Personally, though, that way doesn't give me anywhere near the sensation that a lubed stroke does, and I have to wonder whether being uncircumcized would interfere with that. I also don't like sensation on the head, so I really wouldn't want skin moving over it. Maybe I just developed this way because of being circumcized though.
 
I considered having a circumcision once (cosmetic reasons) and was told I'd lose a lot of sensation due to the loss of nerve endings. Bollocks to that then...
 
bihardcock69, yeah sometimes i do that too - good when im wanking at the place it is difficult to clean, so after cumming i keep the cum in foreskin for few seconds untill i come to bathroom to wash it.
 
foreskin itself is very sensitive. it already feels good when you just touch the foreskin without touching the penis itself at all. further more the nerve endings in the foreskin give a special sensation when the foreskin is stretched and rolled, it is basically designed to give good feelings when it glides back and forth during intercourse
 
Would love to have my foreskin back! Have sucked few uncut cockst and love the way that skin feels as you lick inside that foreskin/ also in to docking what I call 2 cocks making love. Two piss heads meet and kiss! Oh what feeling!
 
sorry for all you cut guys! foreskin is good for wanking, but cut dicks have advantage with condoms - too put one on first i have to retract, then roll the condom to bottom of my man, than bring the foreskin back on the haed (with condom, taking care that it doesnt slip down), and then again roll the condom to the base. turn off ha?
 
The foreskin is there for a reason. It protects a very sensitive part of the body: the glans of the penis. It is the male equivalent of the hood of the clitoris. The head of a cut cock is subjected to all sorts of abrasion from which uncut ones are protected. It looses sensitivity over time.

The practice of routinely circumcising boys began in late 19th century Britain, for the perverse reason that it was thought the foreskin encouraged young Empire builders to engage in morally degrading acts of self-gratification [-X America soon followed suit. No longer in possession of an empire, the Brits have long since come to their senses on this matter. One only wishes that the USA would, too :grrr:

Aside: masturbation is extremely healthy, especially if you start at the onset of puberty. Adolescent masturbation is believed to be protective against prostate cancer in the same way that early pregnancy protects against breast cancer: both encourage the maturation of the tissue before it has had time to accumulate mutations that can lead to cancers.

One bad note: the area under the foreskin can harbor Human Papilloma virus (HPV), making uncut men a reservoir for this pathogen that causes cancer of the cervix in women. However, the extent to which this contributes to the spread of this disease is questionable, as the rate of abnormal PAP smears in Europe, where most men are uncircumcised, is about the same as in America, where most men are.

Rarely, HPV infection can lead to cancer of the penis (yikes!). To the extent that this rare condition is a problem, cut guys are much less at risk.

The good news is that an HPV vaccine should be out shortly. This should irradicate cervical cancer, as well as those rare incidences of penis cancer. It should also have a profound impact on aggressive cancers, where HPV infection is considered to be the major contributory factor (any 'small cell' cancer)

Wouldn't you know: some Christian groups are against routinely vaccinating people against HPV. They feel it will promote promiscuity [-X

Returning to the topic at hand, I wish I had my foreskin, for practical, personal, and cosmetic reasons. And don't let anyone tell you it doesn't hurt the baby. Most of those little guys scream like mad when they get snipped. What a way to enter the world :mad:
 
Forgive me if I am wrong here. I was always taught that circumsition was an ancient Jewish and early christian rite used to show your alligence to God!
 
adidas4boyspunk said:
HPV is also implicated in the development of cancer of the anal canal.

However, more recent studies have shown that it was the testing method for HPV that was at fault in "detecting" the differing infection rates and more sensitive testing methods have shown no difference between circumcised and uncircumcised.

The only evidence of which I am aware supporting higher rates of HPV carriage among uncircumcised men is the near non-existance of abnormal PAPs among Hassidic women (whose husbands have all felt the mohel's knife, suffice it to say) But then maybe it's those holes in the sheets. I hear those bitches get freaky once they take their wigs off :sex:

Virulent strains of HPV are likely players in most squamous cell carcinomas.
 
The practice of routinely circumcising boys began in late 19th century Britain, for the perverse reason that it was thought the foreskin encouraged young Empire builders to engage in morally degrading acts of self-gratification

I think that was the same reason why ancient jews started to do that too,and that's why judeo-christianity,at least in mainstream,is such an "anti-sex" religion.
 
thei06 said:
but cut dicks have advantage with condoms - too put one on first i have to retract, then roll the condom to bottom of my man, than bring the foreskin back on the haed (with condom, taking care that it doesnt slip down), and then again roll the condom to the base. turn off ha?
what the heck? i never needed to do that, retract pull over, done. and that not really a turn off nor complicated.
 
Chrizze said:
I think that was the same reason why ancient jews started to do that too,and that's why judeo-christianity,at least in mainstream,is such an "anti-sex" religion.

Physical pleasure is wrong, that's why.
 
corny, i guess you have shorter foreskin - does it cover your head when hard? - mine does, some 80%. consider yourself lucky!
still, i like my foreskin.
 
Back
Top