Rolyo85
Execuvette
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Posts
- 9,665
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Boystown, Chicago
- Website
- proconscience.blogspot.com
Yeah, you are actually probably right. Wasn't he famous for bursting in tears when gay marriage passed in NY?
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Yeah, you are actually probably right. Wasn't he famous for bursting in tears when gay marriage passed in NY?
Sad, empty existence. Have you read "Bigot Christmas" by Dan Savage btw? Where he describes that famous debate dinner he threw for Brown? I loved it.
Personally I think these statistics are off but here's a look at the next states poised to have same-sex marriage:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politic...states-to-legalize-marriage-equality-20131127
Colorado is very likely to soon announce they will move to put the issue on the ballot in 2014.
'
Dolan: Catholics 'outmarketed' on gay marriage
Wasn't Dolan the one who won't let us march in the St. Patrick's Day parade in NYC?
Outmarketed? Why don't you contact J. Walter Thompson. You can afford it.
Actually, you can blame individuals who love their partners. Love has nothing to do with either politicians or Hollywood. You're just looking for someone to blame.
I know it won't, but don't tell Pope Francis.
Your eminence, please check the part of the U.S. Constitution which reads, "Equal protection under the law." If you can forgive me for being gay, I'll disregard the Spanish Inquisition.
Yeah those statistics are silly. We all know it's 100% chance in all 50 states. Okay, maybe not right away, but they were still completely made up. New Mexico is not 3-2 likely. It is very likely, and so is Oregon. I put New Mexico as topping 95% that they will return judgment in favor of same sex marriage based on the arguments that I myself witnessed in court on October 23.
This I will say, it is going to be harder for the media to get the facts right with so much going on. They will have journalists who really aren't experienced writing about the topic prognosticating on events and giving incorrect details and using incorrect terminology.
For information, I would stick to news from the organizations actually doing the work, or primary sources such as government documents, court orders, etc. Of course, we will do a hefty bit of reporting here trying to establish the most accurate information and best guesses as to the future.
Still waiting on Bostic v McDonnell...
Virginia will likely beat Oregon, since the district court has a democratic appointed judge and is known for being very fast (the average length of time from filing to decision is only 1 year), and also due to the fact that Democrats have taken every statewide office, no one will appeal such a decision.
Sevcik could also make Oregon's ballot initiative a symbolic repeal rather than an effective one.

I can't recall the issue, but Oregon has done double whammies like that before, sinking something both in the courts and by vote of the people.
It gives us a chance to comment on how sometimes the courts are as smart as the people....

These marriages may also be registered in Israel.
That's got to really piss off the fundies.
