I have notice on fans sites that some guys are just born as sex slaves They have to give bj then they have to bottom but they are getting nothing in return. The term is to be the bitch then he has to jack off himself to finish Is that sex?
The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums
-
Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community
In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
If you do not have an account, please register.
REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your InfoPLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
What is the point of a 1sided sex?
- Thread starter blubee
- Start date
Harke the Boeotarch
Dreams Wash Away
Because that exactly is what they get in return.
LeicsDom
JUB Addict
Some are born to serve. Tis the way of the world
According to a popular book on gay sex, they are called "pleasure traps" and unfairly labeled as dysfunctional. The person who prefers a passive role in sex and then masturbates to orgasm, is getting just as much enjoyment as the active person.
NotHardUp1
What? Me? Really?
It is strange that you described them as being "born" to their sexual role.
It is a behavior. It is a learned behavior.
The concept of identifying as a top or a bottom is a learned behavior about behavior.
It is a behavior. It is a learned behavior.
The concept of identifying as a top or a bottom is a learned behavior about behavior.
I never understood that
I am facebook friends with this guy and he sent me videos of him and his boyfriend and the one guy is a total bottom he sucked his bf dick ate his ass gets pounded and he gets nothing in return why not make your bottom boyfriend cum too so you can both relax?
I am facebook friends with this guy and he sent me videos of him and his boyfriend and the one guy is a total bottom he sucked his bf dick ate his ass gets pounded and he gets nothing in return why not make your bottom boyfriend cum too so you can both relax?
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Posts
- 121,428
- Reaction score
- 32,951
- Points
- 113
It is possible that the one person 'serving' the other wants to be in total control of their own orgasm.
And of course for some in a master/slave relationship, particularly where they may be locked in chastity, it is about denial of orgasm.
People are pretty complex creatures when it comes to pleasure.
And of course for some in a master/slave relationship, particularly where they may be locked in chastity, it is about denial of orgasm.
People are pretty complex creatures when it comes to pleasure.
I’m a submissive guy, I ooze precum when being fucked. I have hands free orgasms from being fucked. I only cum from prostate manipulation. I get the most pleasure when my ass or mouth has made a man cum. Nothing like it.
Actual lyrics: "Sweet dreams are made of these."
Kahaih
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2012
- Posts
- 8,562
- Reaction score
- 1,978
- Points
- 113
NotHardUp1
What? Me? Really?
Because it's all casual speculation. It could be lizard people vs. humans as far as anyone's opinion goes.You're free to believe that, but I don't.
I like JUB because there is a range of opinions on many things.
At times, when we assert one, whether common or uncommon, whether popular or unpopular, it can be read by many as a claim to be authoritative, similar to when a doctor might post about COVID, yet even then, one doctor's opinion is one among millions.
Some decades ago, it became common to preface debated points with "in my opinion" or "I think". I've always avoided that when I catch myself inclining, as it automatically weakens one's point. It should be manifestly obvious that I hold my opinion and that it is proffered in contrast to an opposing view. Diminishing it by offering an introductory apology for having it seems a bit PC and of the view that we should affirm that all opinions/views are equal.
But, I am fine with opinions not being equal so long as we accept that all views may be expressed as views. The whole point of puttting them out in the marketplace of ideas is that we then supply the listener with the beginnings of investigation.
I've learned countless things on JUB from reading the often surprisings statements on myriad subjects, sometimes delivered as proven facts, and sometimes they are discovered to be true.
As the question of sexual role certainly goes to the question of dominance, it would be really interesting to learn what genetic, psychological, and spiritual research has been done to learn how much dominance is innate.
Only of the lousy top doesn't ever even get close to the prostate.
You're likewise free to believe that everyone strives to get the best out of themselves in life.You're free to believe that, but I don't.
I always recall all the revered wiser-than-belamyi of JUB being all for the "benevolent dictator" as the most desirable form of rule.
The concept of identifying a behaviour as systematically learned is a learned thought.
It is fascinating that you handled inborn tendencies and conditioned behaviours with an instilled belief.
Oh, as for the OP, the point is to get off right away, which is the main point of daily sex: you can expect some people to be true connaisseurs and sybarites of sex but, like with anything else in life (food and drink, art and music, clothing and perfume, whatever and whatever), you can not expect that to be the general rule to lead everyone's life.