The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

What is your Opinion of the Media?

Status
Not open for further replies.

PabloZed

JUB Addict
Joined
Dec 22, 2005
Posts
1,751
Reaction score
0
Points
0
One of the unfortunate parts of having too much freetime is watching too much tv. And what I have come to absolutely hate is the lack of intelligence, balance, and professionalism in the US media. Perhaps this is what one should expect from cable tv and the quest for ratings, but isn't the public entitled to more facts than opinions?

What has bothered me recently has been these tv hosts who will quote or refer to some unnamed source and cite it as fact. For example, on the night of the inauguration a "reporter" was inside the armed forces ball and said on the air, "I was talking to some soldiers and what they want most from the new president is to be able to finish their mission in Iraq." I personally called bullshit when I heard it and the reason I could is because there was no source for the statement. Just the word of a biased employee of an untrustworthy news organization. Where is the journalistic code that requires named sources for material, particularly material that is either controversial or subject to question?

One other disturbing trend is for the media to be owned by corporations so that the message reflects the interests of the corporate owner over journalism. General Electric owns NBC, CNBC and MSNBC and News Corp owns Fox, the Wall Street Journal and FoxNews. The concentration of power combined with corporate ownership perverts the news they present. Hopefully, the new Justice Department and FCC will investigate this monopolization of opinion.
 
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jp-8TiSGgTM[/ame]
 
The only media that is even somewhat unbiased are the half an hour nightly network news shows. None of the cable news networks come anywhere close to be unbiased or fair. You have Fox News on one end and CNN and MSNBC on the other. Their agendas are so obvious that it's sickening. They have all talking heads on the shows who often aren't any more qualified than I am to be discussing the topic. I rarely watch any of the cable news networks anymore.
 
My biggest problem with the media is that it's dominated by large outfits. What the Founding Fathers thought of as a free press was independent newspapers in every city, with a whole realm of viewpoints represented. That would be far healthier for the Republic than what we have now.
 
Here is what is interesting - no one defended the media as "unbiased and truthful." So we are mostly in agreement, but yet we allow it. I believe one reason the media sucks so bad is that people are chosen to appear on tv based on looks, not skill and intelligence. In other words, cable is full of attractive idiots.
 
Tired of the media. They spin and make things up for views. It's all about the money, money, money.
 
Well someone is just necrotizing the forum today...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top