I would like to cross-examine your post, JockTalk.  Your post basically speaks right to my own point in my post about caricatures vs everyday people.  Without explicitly saying it, your post basically says that you aren't "gay enough" if you don't put people like Midler, Streisand, Judy, and Gaga on a pedestal.  What your post fails to realize is that there are millions, perhaps hundreds of millions of gay people on this planet for whom Judy, Gaga, and Madonna have absolutely Zero relevance to their lives as gay people.
It's as if liking dick isn't good enough to qualify one as gay, according to your post.  When, really, that's all homosexuality was ever supposed to be about - being attracted to one's own gender.  Not about which so-called "pop icons" do you worship.  
Me, I worship dick.  And maybe, tattoos, body hair, and great biceps.  
  But when you mention Streisand or Madonna to me, I'm like, "Um, okay.  /shrugs...  Did I miss something?"  I just don't care.  They just don't move the needle for me, they just don't.  And that's not something we, as fellow gay people, should have to apologize for, or even have to explain ourselves regarding.  Sorry, not sorry.
Your post further equates Madonna, Midler, Gaga, etc., with the same importance and relevance as something like, say, the weather.  No matter what walk of life you're from, every man, woman, and child on this planet is personally and directly impacted by weather.  "Will the rain party-crash the outdoor concert I wanna go to, this weekend?"  "Will dense fog slow down my morning commute in to work?"  "Will ice stop the busses from running, making school be cancelled for tomorrow?"  "How hot will it be when we go on our picnic date, this afternoon?"  You see? - Personal and direct relevance to people's lives.  Streisand, Garland, etc., simply aren't on that same level of personal and direct relevance to all gay people.  They just aren't.
That's kinda what I was thinking.