The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

What pisses you off more

¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿

  • People linking pics to photobucket (or imageshack)

    Votes: 9 34.6%

  • Threads posting in the wrong section

    Votes: 2 7.7%

  • Congratulatory threads (especially when pretending not to be so)

    Votes: 3 11.5%

  • Certain JUBbers

    Votes: 8 30.8%

  • Other (specify)

    Votes: 4 15.4%
  • Total voters
    26
Harke the Boeotarch said:
More than anything else you mentioned, and more than anything else that is possible to mention, and more than any conceivable but unmentionable thing and even more than any inconceivable and unmentionable thing that is nonetheless ontologically possible and more intolerable than anything in this sentence so far.

Thank you for understanding.
Click to expand...
According to what ontology?
 
belamy said:
According to what ontology?
Click to expand...

The Harke the [STRIKE]Heretics[/STRIKE] Boeotarch's speculative ontology of proposing an undefined but distinct highest degree of pissed-offness at the very borderlands of human conception which is nonetheless inferior to the degree of pissed-offness that is due to the entity I described in my first post.

This ideas has parallels in theology.
 
Harke the Boeotarch said:
The Harke the [strike]Heretics[/strike] Boeotarch's speculative ontology of proposing an undefined but distinct highest degree of pissed-offness at the very borderlands of human conception which is nonetheless inferior to the degree of pissed-offness that is due to the entity I described in my first post.

This ideas has parallels in theology.
Click to expand...
First of them all, or first where? And first of the you you are now or the you you used to be or the one yet to be or the one you are being always?

 
I have existed from the morning of the world and I shall exist until the last star falls from the night. Although I have taken the form of Harke the Boeotarch, I am all men as I am no man and therefore I am, have been and shall be the sum of all pissed-offness act you diachronocologically, extratemporally and now-eternally.
 
We all have our pet peeves. But one of mine here is when someone includes a bunch of pics when quoting a previous post with pics. There's already enough crap that has to load with each page; having to load the same pics multiple times makes it worse.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top