Far be it from me to put words in peoples mouths but Trinket and Singularity may wish to check his wording in the context of hamwise's post. I think from the context of the post he meant and I am NOT a homophobe. I will stand corrected but I believe thats a typo. The context of the post is pro gay. pro gay porn just that he doesnt particularly enjoy having gay sex.
Whatever he meant, his statement was confusing nonetheless.
As to the main discussion, I think it is perfectly possible for 'straight'/'hetero' men to experience some degree of arousal from gay porn. As aagold76 said the focus on the cock in straight porn is so integral that its difficult to differentiate the two. Why are there niches for 'big cock' films on straight tube sites or indeed complete websites for straight big cock porn if there is no element of cock attraction in straight porn? There must be for your average Joe to jack off to some poor silicon enhanced, disproportioned, fake tanned bimbo with less convincing makeup than a particularly average drag queen, taking a ten incher up the arse and screaming in 'ecstacy' before he's even put his cock up her pussy. In a cock closeup of oral anal action, sometimes if it wasnt for the bouncing balls of the bottom or his fuzzy chin square cut jaw and adams apple you wouldnt be able to tell, and in the case of fem twinks you would be even harder pressed to tell.
That very may well be and the more I peek over the fence, the more I can see how men in straight porn are getting more attention, both in their physical appearance and their screen time - the last thing a "normal" straight guy would want the focus on.
I guess, my personal issue with the facts of this discussion stem from my feeling that when I hear a straight guy gets aroused by gay porn or even trying out what he sees and liking it - despite not looking for it actively - makes me feel like he undermines my own sexuality.
I don't want to get too deep into this jungle of misconceptions, but the gist of it is that I've always feared that my exclusive attraction to men is wrong according to social views while a "normal" [straight] guy could have it anytime and get away with it.
It's so headache-inducing.
You're welcome my friend.
I'll answer best I can.
...
From What I can tell, you are on the opposite side of the spectrum in relation to me. I, too, can see the possibility of having sex with a girl, but I am only attracted to guys, both sexually and romantically. I can watch straight porn but it doesn't excite me.
Nothing wrong for you [and your sexual partner] to get some pointers.
Totally right. This is the reason why I find myself looking at more amateur, no-US, and vintage porn clips. The women just look far better. Especially pull up some mainstream porn from the 70's to the early 90's, and it's kinda shocking just how much the look of women in porn has changed. The SEX in vintage straight porn is so much more raw and natural, less stylized, and the women were overall better performers and just looked better. And that's porn that was basically before my sexual time.
There are still many great looking, more natural women in porn today, but you do have to search to find it. The average mainstream porn chicks of today almost look like bad drag queens, which is very unfortunate.
As a matter of fact, the same can be said about gay porn. Back in the 70s and 80s - and even well into the 90s - the men of gay porn were more natural and real about the sex. Now, since the G4P elite and porn star attitude has taken over, it's harder to find gay porn where they guys have sex for the sake of having sex.
Sometimes, watching all these inked and pierced muscle mountains showing off makes me wish I was born a couple of decades earlier, where porn was personal and real and not the profit-producing business it is today.