The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

On-Topic Who are you voting for this November?

Who are you voting for this November?

  • Jill Stein

    Votes: 3 7.5%

  • Gary Johnson

    Votes: 1 2.5%

  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 3 7.5%

  • Hillary Clinton

    Votes: 30 75.0%

  • i wont/cant vote/not registered/im a spectator

    Votes: 3 7.5%
  • Total voters
    40
  • Poll closed .
Hankerin1075 said:
I'm just trying to explain my reasoning. You don't have to agree with me. It is very simple. I don't want killary's SC. I didn't vote for Trump in the primaries. I will vote for whomever opposes her. Simple. I'm not trying to talk you into it. You are all set in your ways. I figured you would be supporting a liberal. No surprise there. I just can't freaking stand hillary.


Don't get started on some tangent about voting rights either. The Republican Party made it possible for minorities to vote in the first place.
Click to expand...

MARY!

Stop. You're going to make me spit coffee all over my keyboard. Don't worry, no one is going to bother arguing with that. You're in the clear.
 
Tip, don't beg for the pile on, it's just not seemly.
 
Just expressing myself. Is that not allowed here? I'm not following lockstep with the crowd. Shocking to some I guess.
 
Hankerin1075 said:
Just expressing myself. Is that not allowed here? I'm not following lockstep with the crowd. Shocking to some I guess.
Click to expand...

:rotflmao:

Oh come on, don't pretend that you're being oppressed. You went for the obvious troll, got called on it, there you are.
 
Hankerin1075 said:
I don't want a left wing SC. That's it for me. Killary will stack the court with liberal fools. That is the opposite of what I want. I'm going to vote based on SC nominations. Both candidates are a tragedy. A left leaning court will destroy this nation. It's already bad enough.
Click to expand...

For a homo to say that they want a conservative Supreme Court...it can only mean one of several things.

1. You're not a homo. But we have some evidence to the contrary. Without the liberals on the SC, we wouldn't have homo marriage in the US

2. You might be a homo, but you don't like any of the Voting Rights Act protection or other race based decisions designed to undo the Jim Crow heritage of the US.

3. Above...but you're one of the homos who believe that while the nation should stay out of your business...you have the right to dictate a woman's right to choose.

4. You don't realize that it was a conservative court that gave the US Citizens United and pretty much destroyed the Republic while allowing the increasing intrusion of religion into the state.

5. You share the same vagina hate as a few others on this forum.
 
Im not trolling. Just giving my opinion. If it hurts you, that's your problem not mine. As I already stated, I'm not here to argue.
 
I want a conservative leaning court. Yes. I do not like the liberal view on gun control. I think the Feds should stay out of the marriage business all together.
 
Hankerin1075 said:
I want a conservative leaning court. Yes. I do not like the liberal view on gun control. I think the Feds should stay out of the marriage business all together.
Click to expand...

That's MUCH better! Now WHAT is the "Liberal" view on gun control? I'm as far left as it's possible to get and I own several shotguns, a handgun, and a lever action .22 Winchester (just like the Rifleman's) that my Daddy gave me on my eighth birthday.

The Fed has nothing to do with marriage laws that's all State. All the Feds did is tell the states they couldn't fuck us over anymore.

- - - Updated - - -

Hankerin1075 said:
They sound like reasonable folks.
Click to expand...

I'm still not sure you aren't a sock puppet for one of them.
 
Hankerin1075 said:
The FBI has it. They have already made several statements about this subject.
Click to expand...

Yeah, they have evidence crimes were committed that's why they said no crimes were committed.

Weak.

Are you going to respond to post #192?
 
TX-Beau said:
That's MUCH better! Now WHAT is the "Liberal" view on gun control? I'm as far left as it's possible to get and I own several shotguns, a handgun, and a lever action .22 Winchester (just like the Rifleman's) that my Daddy gave me on my eighth birthday.

The Fed has nothing to do with marriage laws that's all State. All the Feds did is tell the states they couldn't fuck us over anymore
- - - Updated - - -

Very cool! I love those lever guns. I've been wanting a Henry in .357 for a while. Haven't gotten around to it yet. I'm more of a pistol guy. The liberal view in general pushes for more regulations and controls against lawful possession and use of firearms. I feel that we are regulated enough as it is.

I'm still not sure you aren't a sock puppet for one of them.
Click to expand...

TX-Beau said:
That's MUCH better! Now WHAT is the "Liberal" view on gun control? I'm as far left as it's possible to get and I own several shotguns, a handgun, and a lever action .22 Winchester (just like the Rifleman's) that my Daddy gave me on my eighth birthday.

The Fed has nothing to do with marriage laws that's all State. All the Feds did is tell the states they couldn't fuck us over anymore
- - - Updated - - -[/COLOR

I'm still not sure you aren't a sock puppet for one of them.
Click to expand...

Very cool! I love those lever guns. A buddy has one in .357 that's lots of fun. I'm more of a pistol guy. Only have 3 rifles and hardly ever shoot them.
The liberal view in general is to increase regulations and constrict gun rights for the law abiding citizens. We have enough laws on the books already.
 
This site format is very different for me. I guess I screwed that last one up. Oops.
 
TX-Beau said:
Yeah, they have evidence crimes were committed that's why they said no crimes were committed.

Weak.

Are you going to respond to post #192?
Click to expand...
They wrote a detailed report. They decided not to prosecute her. They spelled out very clearly the crimes that were committed.
 
Hankerin1075 said:
They wrote a detailed report. They decided not to prosecute her. They spelled out very clearly the crimes that were committed.
Click to expand...

SHOW US where they said crimes were committed that they were going to decline to prosecute.

They said she was careless with information, and she was, if YOU have actual evidence she was criminally liable, WHERE is it. Mis-characterizing what the FBI actually said doesn't cut it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top