Who says China doesn't have ''Democracy and Freedom'' ?

[Telstra]

Also i have looked at the References unloadonme.
ALL anti china organizations US or UK or western backed propaganda.

 

[KaraBulut]

Uighurs persecution is FALSE. Falun Gong is a cult.
And this cult own the Epoch Times. Backed by CIA.

And operate out of Glorious China Chicken parlors so that they can kidnap babies to eat their adrenal glands ? Seems familiar.

 

[rareboy]

I can't even even.

 

[belamyi]

China doesn't even poop, how dare you yokels even suggest its shit stinks!!

 

[Thad1527]

Even if Falun Gong is a cult, I stand for freedom of religion. Even religions I disagree with. I stand with Jehovah's Witnesses in Ukraine and Malawi, even as I give them minimal time at my door.

 

[belamyi]

''Democracy and Freedom'' ?
They have their ''own style'' of democracy and Freedom without failed electoral system.
Don't understand what they are talking about but i'm sure its about the US trying to oppose in every way possible and they have ''freedom'' to discuss it on TV to the public.

If they are honest about the obvious fail of the fake "power to the people" system in the Western world, why are they still buying the concepts of "democracy" and "freedom" at all, and pretend they are democratic too, just in a different way?
Europe has 5,000 years of civilization history too

 

[Telstra]

Even if Falun Gong is a cult, I stand for freedom of religion. Even religions I disagree with. I stand with Jehovah's Witnesses in Ukraine and Malawi, even as I give them minimal time at my door.

Of course i agree with you, i stand by harmless religions.
But Falun Gong is not harmless !!!

 

[belamyi]

Of course i agree with you, i stand by harmless religions.
But Falun Gong is not harmless !!!

No religion is harmless, because they are based on a partial but absolute, overbearing vision of the world and its people: you can have individual religious beliefs like I can have this personal belief about religions, but the problem with religion, and creeds and ideologies in general, is when they spread to the mindless masses, and then they are there to make people take the world for granted and stop actually thinking about it, because it considers all the solutions and answers are contained in a book or a few phrases. The problem of religions is that of viruses: it may not be than much of a big deal in itself, but it gets really dangerous once it starts spreading randomly around.

Falun is to religions what Greenpeace is to ecologism: the more outspokenly political bitchier side. The problem of the Chinese government with Falun is the same they discovered with Catholic religion back in the XVIIth century, and the same you have with some opinion leaders: it is more than just beliefs and opinions, and once it gets political or, better said, it messes up with the social and mental order of things from the bottom up, instead of from up to the bottom.

 

[belamyi]

^ Supress the second from last "and".

 

[Telstra]

wow wow wow, this is propaganda of course, but who wouldn't want this?
They are living much much better than the native of Australia, US or Canada !!! think about it:

 

[belamyi]

^ WOW WOW WOW China living the 1950s American Dream in the 2020s: the Chinese are living much much better now that they have been americanized, than under Mao's Big Wile E. Coyote Leap

 

[KaraBulut]

Seems familiar...

 

[Pierresro]

Hope you have a wonderful lieik I assume you are going to china have great life!

 

[unloadonme]

Democracy and freedom in action:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57549542

 

[Telstra]

Seems familiar...

That shows how brainwashed you are Kara and know NOTHING about China. Nothing at all.
For your information, the US PBS has produced a documentary about China's poverty alleviation programs but didn't broadcast it to the American public because of political pressure or CIA pressure.

 

[Telstra]

Hope you have a wonderful lieik I assume you are going to china have great life!

I cannot speak Mandarin, so it is not going to work

 

[Telstra]

Democracy and freedom in action:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57549542

I used to respect the BBC, but not anymore.
BBC is the mouth piece of the UK government and bend over backwards to the US government.

 

[KaraBulut]

That shows how brainwashed you are Kara and know NOTHING about China. Nothing at all.
For your information, the US PBS has produced a documentary about China's poverty alleviation programs but didn't broadcast it to the American public because of political pressure or CIA pressure.

Bless your heart.

After PBS drops film, PBS SoCal reviews documentary produced in association with a Chinese state TV network [Current.org]

PBS SoCal has launched an internal review of a documentary it co-produced after PBS said the film failed to meet its editorial standards.

Voices from the Frontline: China’s War on Poverty was co-produced by the Los Angeles station and a foundation led by Robert Lawrence Kuhn in association with the China Global Television Network. Kuhn is an author, a former investment banker and the film’s host and writer. CGTN is operated by CCTV, a network owned by China Media Group, which is overseen by the Publicity Department of the Communist Party of China.

Kuhn’s foundation helps fund his films for public TV and has also supported PBS SoCal, according to tax filings. Kuhn, an expert on China, has worked on several public TV programs.

Robert Lawrence Kuhn is a frequent contributor to The South China Morning Post (which is owned by Chinese conglomerate Alibaba Group). He is the host of Closer to China with R.L.Kuhn on CCTV News.

The "documentary" wasn't produced by PBS. It was produced by a local PBS affiliate in Southern California and was funded by the Chinese Communist Party. The PBS Network rejected it for obvious reasons.

There's probably a YouTube video that explains why this is a conflict of interest.

 

[Telstra]

Bless your heart.

After PBS drops film, PBS SoCal reviews documentary produced in association with a Chinese state TV network [Current.org]



Robert Lawrence Kuhn is a frequent contributor to The South China Morning Post (which is owned by Chinese conglomerate Alibaba Group). He is the host of Closer to China with R.L.Kuhn on CCTV News.

The "documentary" wasn't produced by PBS. It was produced by a local PBS affiliate in Southern California and was funded by the Chinese Communist Party. The PBS Network rejected it for obvious reasons.

There's probably a YouTube video that explains why this is a conflict of interest.

So the US is famous for ''freedom of speech, freedom of thoughts .... etc''
What are they afraid of for such a tame documentary ??

 

[KaraBulut]

So the US is famous for ''freedom of speech, freedom of thoughts .... etc''
What are they afraid of for such a tame documentary ??

This is also a misunderstanding of US law.

The US does not have "free speech". The US has a Constitution that prevents the Federal government from making laws regarding the exercise of free speech by its citizens. Private entities which are not part of the US government can constraint or restrict speech as they see fit.

The Chinese Communist Party is not a citizen of the United States and has no right to unrestricted speech in the US.

PBS is not part of the US government and therefore it has the right to reject anything that does not meet its standards.

National Defense Authorization Act of 2017 has a section of a bill formerly known as " Countering Information Warfare Act of 2016". The US Government can legally counter any propaganda produced by a foreign government.