Why are con blogs obsessed with Hillary and not their own candidates?

[PER4MER]

Considering the slate the Pugs are running, what would there be to obsess about?

 

[chance1]

^ she will be their opponent in the general election

it's that simple

 

[Soilwork]

They realize that people don't buy their big bag of bullshit anymore and are now maybe trying to divert attention away from themselves, I guess.

Conservatives are all kinda dumb and clued-out. It's how they've been able to be distracted away from important things like the war and hurricane Katrina with things like "The War On Christmas" and gay marriage.

It's easier to attack Hillary Clinton with schoolyard names like "the Hildebeast" instead of taking a good look at the group of tards they're trying to figure out who to run.

What are you going to do? An in-depth look at Rudy's record on gay issues?

 

[seven_sins]

The neocons that I know only criticize those whose principles they disagree with. They never defend the principles they believe in.

 

[iman]

Conservative never "go positive". They are in perpetual opposition to some imagined threat. They called FDR a communist and a traitor, the Jews were supposed to be manipulating the whole world, they opposed racial integration, called JFK a commie, wanted to impeach Justice Warren,think the UN is a big conspiracy, posited the "domino theory" during Vietnam, and now get exercised over Islamofascists and Mexicans.

They're nuts and liars that believe humans are inherently evil and should live in fear, real or imagined. They will always be with us, but we should not let them drag us down with them.

 

[chance1]

Conservative never "go positive". They are in perpetual opposition to some imagined threat. They called FDR a communist and a traitor, the Jews were supposed to be manipulating the whole world, they opposed racial integration, called JFK a commie, wanted to impeach Justice Warren,think the UN is a big conspiracy, posited the "domino theory" during Vietnam, and now get exercised over Islamofascists and Mexicans.

They're nuts and liars that believe humans are inherently evil and should live in fear, real or imagined. They will always be with us, but we should not let them drag us down with them.

FDR??????

isn't he dead? for like a long time?

and ur bringing him up why?

Justice Warren?

man

get on topic will ya?

why are cons obsessed with Hillary?

DUH

 

[Soilwork]

FDR??????

isn't he dead? for like a long time?

and ur bringing him up why?

Justice Warren?

man

get on topic will ya?

why are cons obsessed with Hillary?

DUH

See?

Some people are just incapable of "getting it."

We call them "Republicans."

 

[winterknight]

People always forget that before being nominated to the SCOTUS, Earl Warren served three terms as Governor of California - as a Republican.

Of course back then the GOP was nothing at all like it is now, but hey.

 

[chance1]

See?

Some people are just incapable of "getting it."

We call them "Republicans."

what a prince

"we call them" - is priceless too - not sure u got a lotta "we"

this from a guy who is just gonna pull the lever democrat - no matter who it is

 

[RandomAccess]

^ Why wouldn't he? The worst Democrat is light years better than the best Republican.

 

[Soilwork]

what a prince

"we call them" - is priceless too - not sure u got a lotta "we"

this from a guy who is just gonna pull the lever democrat - no matter who it is

Yeah.. because no matter who it is will be better than who it was.

Geez, try to keep up there, Pokey.

 

[chance1]

Yeah.. because no matter who it is will be better than who it was.

Geez, try to keep up there, Pokey.

better than who it "was" I get - that's a given I think - I think we can probably agree on that

but if John Edwards gets the nod - he's ur choice no matter what? or Kucinich or whomever on the Dem side?

u may wanna ck out their positions before saying "u got my vote"

is all

as for "keeping up" - not to worry - i not only "keep up", I usually lead

how bout u?

 

[Soilwork]

as for "keeping up" - not to worry - i not only "keep up", I usually lead

I haven't seen any evidence of that here at JUB, I'm afraid.

 

[RandomAccess]

. . .
as for "keeping up" - not to worry - i not only "keep up", I usually lead
. . .

When does THAT start?

 

[iman]

FDR??????

isn't he dead? for like a long time?

and ur bringing him up why?

Justice Warren?

man

get on topic will ya?

why are cons obsessed with Hillary?

DUH

Just a little history of a movement that has been consistently wrong since the 1950's.

I should also point out that "DUH" is not a particularly good argument, especially for "a leader".

 

[chance1]

I haven't seen any evidence of that here at JUB, I'm afraid.

then to quote a great man "try to keep up there"

 

[MystikWizard]

I just spent the last 45 minutes reading some popular conservative blogs....the attacking of Hillary is overwhelming. Where is the discussion among the conservatives about their own candidates? Even here at JUB the 2.4% are obsessed with Hillary.

There is one exception though on the blogs...when they do talk about a republican candidate they are talking about Ronn Paul.

Conservative blogs should be talking about Paul. Hell, he is going to raise over $3.1 Million dollars in a single day (today) alone. He is the only GOP Anti War Candidate. His entire campaign message is entirely different from the rest of the GOP, who you can't distinguish apart from each other.

As far as attacking Hillary, I honestly think the GOP wants to run against her. They want everyone to think that she's the only one the Democratic Party has, and then they plan on attacking her integrity (or lack thereof) and her double talk hard in the General Election and cast doubt in the voters.

Choose your candidate wisely in the Primaries.