The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

On-Topic Why Democrats Are So Scared of Benghazi

Status
Not open for further replies.
... a dumb video had nothing to do with it …

Yes, the "Innocence of Muslims" Video Really Did Play a Role in the Benghazi Attacks (Mother Jones; May 2, 2014)

KEVIN DRUM Political Blogger
The inventor of Friday catblogging, Kevin was a blogosphere pioneer when, after a stint in marketing, he went online as Calpundit in 2003. Prior to joining MoJo, he blogged at the Washington Monthly's Political Animal. He lives with his wife and two cats in Irvine.
[Link]

Here’s an interesting link that appears on the same Daily Beast page as the article linked in the opening post:



Jack Springer, if you want to continue this discussion, you should probably set aside some time for personal research and also be willing to engage on legitimate matters associated with the broader topic. Simply quoting conspiracy theorists seems kinda lame.

“The whole thing's a cover-up. The whole thing is optics. The whole thing is a distraction.” – Rush Limbaugh; August 20, 2013
 
Or, for that matter, the huge lethal embassy attacks in 1998 under Bill Clinton, a Democrat.

They were, instead, too busy with the Monica Lewinsky bullshit.

Part of the difference, I feel, is that many of these people absolutely hate that a Black, not a White, guy is in the Oval Office.

Playing the race card doesn't work anymore.
 
Yes, the "Innocence of Muslims" Video Really Did Play a Role in the Benghazi Attacks (Mother Jones; May 2, 2014)


Here’s an interesting link that appears on the same Daily Beast page as the article linked in the opening post:



Jack Springer, if you want to continue this discussion, you should probably set aside some time for personal research and also be willing to engage on legitimate matters associated with the broader topic. Simply quoting conspiracy theorists seems kinda lame.

“The whole thing's a cover-up. The whole thing is optics. The whole thing is a distraction.” – Rush Limbaugh; August 20, 2013

What conspiracy?

I'm sorry you don't have an open mind in this discussion and blindly follow whatever is told you without question.

I suppose there were articles like the one you mention during Watergate.
 
What conspiracy?

I'm sorry you don't have an open mind in this discussion and blindly follow whatever is told you without question.

I suppose there were articles like the one you mention during Watergate.

But you've been asked point blank what it is that you think is being hidden, and you can't even answer it. You just keep saying "there's probably something."
 
JB -- you're always coming across as all high-and-mighty, yet you think it's funny to make light of 4 dead Americans. - Nope, it's sad they're dead from Republican funding cuts, but you continue to use their dead bodies to score imaginary political points at your own risk.

Did you laugh at your grandfather's funeral. From your response I think you probably did. - Personal attack. What does this have to do with my grandpa's funeral?

Glad you're not my friend. - I think I'll live.

Responded.
 
JB -- you're always coming across as all high-and-mighty, yet you think it's funny to make light of 4 dead Americans.

Did you laugh at your grandfather's funeral. From your response I think you probably did.

Glad you're not my friend.

Really Springer?

Really?

You have so little (as in Nothing) to present as evidence or justification that you respond to a legitimate post by a personal insult about behaviour at a family member's death?

No one is laughing or mocking the death of four people at the Embassy and CIA headquarters.

What we are mocking is the rancid politicization of those four dead by the Republican party who, instead of attending to the business of the nation, are manufacturing this latest probe as a way of ginning up the base....getting their party faithful to open up their wallets for 2014 and are trying yet again to mount a pre-emptive strike against Hillary running for president in 2016.

Your outrage is as fake as the motivation behind this investigation.
 
Let's face it Jack, this is not getting press because of the number of dead, the cause, or the response. It is getting press because Ambassador Stevens was killed. What the hell was so important that he should have been outside Tripoli? He knew Benghazi was inhospitable; the Embassy had asked for increased security there. Stevens went rogue.
 
Please remove this post because it is against the OP of this thread and since it makes fun of 4 dead Americans.

- - - Updated - - -



Please remove this post.

What? You think opinterph is your little puppy. I think the subject post is legitimate comment: you and Boehner are beating a dead horse.
 
Responded.

You like to laugh and make fun of dead people ... I'll assume you do this on a regular basis.

Democrats are raising funds based on bashing republicans for their stand on getting to the truth on Benghazi.
 
What? You think opinterph is your little puppy. I think the subject post is legitimate comment: you and Boehner are beating a dead horse.

I asked in my original post for people not to make fun of the Americans who were killed in Benghazi.

If posters abided to the rules set forth then I would not have to ask a moderator to remove those posts. I do not see any moderator as a puppy ... the posters willingly and purposely did what they wanted to do and ignored my requests.

Benghazi is not a dead horse. Obama could have settled this long ago but he and his administration has refused to come clean and tell the real story. It's possible that there is nothing bad in Benghazi and the Administration is just acting arrogant -- which would be really stupid of them.
 
You like to laugh and make fun of dead people ... I'll assume you do this on a regular basis.

Democrats are raising funds based on bashing republicans for their stand on getting to the truth on Benghazi.

Please Cite.
 
What Democrats should really be afraid of:

Forget Benghazi. Clinton’s Real Problem Is Obama Fatigue

The latest investigation into the Benghazi attack reminds us that the issue isn’t going away any time soon. Pundits are already speculating about potential damage to Hillary Clinton’s presidential prospects, but don’t believe the hype: Scandals rarely matter much in presidential election campaigns.

A far more significant threat to her potential candidacy is Americans’ desire for new leadership after eight years of the Obama administration. A Pew Research Center/USA Today poll found this week that 65 percent of Americans would “like to see a president who offers different policies and programs.” Only 30 percent said they wanted ones “similar to those of the Obama administration.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/10/u...illarys-real-problem-is-obama-fatigue.html?hp

Of course, Republicans have missed this entirely.

The truth is Obama has spread himself too thin. Every day there are new initiatives. Example:

White House to Focus on Road, Bridge Repair

WASHINGTON — With time running out, a White House official says the Obama administration will intensify its efforts to get Congress to pass legislation that pays for roads and bridge repair.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2014/05/10/us/politics/ap-us-obama.html?hp

The latter is a worthy endeavor, but isn't it the province of a Cabinet secretary.

May Benghazi mania run through 2016.
 
What Democrats should really be afraid of:

Forget Benghazi. Clinton’s Real Problem Is Obama Fatigue

Of course, Republicans have missed this entirely.

ATM, the Republican agenda is to find an agenda.

Attacking Obamacare does not look like it is going to work for them. They need to find another tar baby. Fox News has decided to try Benghazi as that tar baby. But, the Benghazi select committee seems, to me, to be too obviously contrived to be effective as an argument against Democrats this fall. Nobody cares about it. In fact, there is a fair chance that Benghazi could hurt Republicans. I personally suspect it will, so I am pleased that they have proceeded with the Benghazi select committee.

Charles Krauthammer seems to think this, also. He is warning Republicans not to "turn the Benghazi select committee into a circus." However, since the entire reason for the existence of the select committee is to create a circus, there is absolutely no chance that Krauthammer's advice will be heeded.

The Koch brothers also seem to think the Benghazi select committee is a mistake. It looks like they are going to try to target the keystone pipeline as their "scandal" of choice. The Koch brothers probably care about that more than most people, since they have so much money tied up in oil companies. But, it is not the sort of thing that average Americans can really get excited about. I think the Koch brothers are driving down a dead end, as well.

I agree that the real problem for Democrats is Obama fatigue. But, the dearth of ideas on the Republican side about what to do about anything makes it difficult for them to capitalize on the fatigue. They need to offer some alternatives, not simply oppose anything and everything that the administration proposes.


May Benghazi mania run through 2016.

:gogirl:
 
That their President did nothing to rescue the Americans who were fighting for their lives.

What exactly should he have done? Parachute into a war zone and carry them on his back?

Why are you not holding to the same standards the republicans in congress who refunded embassy security? Or do you not believe that happened?
 
Playing the race card doesn't work anymore.

And you honestly think the conspiracy card does? If you bothered to actually research the Benghazi attack outside of the conservative blogosphere, you'd know that no, there AREN'T "enough unanswered questions" for a smoking fun. Which is why nobody but a small circle of sad crazies is even talking about it.
 
I think it's funny that Jack is making rules.

BENGHAZI!!!

Jack isn't mocking, he's been told to exploit!!!! One is a nasty thing them liberals do, the other is a fine upstanding revenue possibility.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top