This is the only time I have referred to any female as a cunt she is one. She is really on shaky ground to go against a Supreme Court Decision could get her in a Federal Jail. I can not wait! God does no marry anyone you can only be married by the State that's why you need a marriage License the religious institution is no more than a worthless ceremony.
The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums
-
Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community
In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
If you do not have an account, please register.
REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your InfoTo register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Why does this woman still have a job?
- Thread starter gsdx
- Start date
jdcnow
Graphics Extraordinaire
She was in office before the decision. County clerks are elected to multi-year terms, just like mayors, senators, congress people, and the President.
Basically, she chose to throw the baby out with the bathwater - "If marriage won't be confined to just one man and one woman, to the exclusion of everyone else, then you know what? We'll just make it so that NOBODY can get married here - straights OR gays. We'll just stop issuing marriage licenses altogether, and that'll fix that!" - that's essentially where she's coming from.
Although, that logic is absolute ludicrous, given that the issuing of a marriage license, thus allowing two people to get married - that is a courtesy service of the government. Just like the postal service is a courtesy service of the federal government. The issuing of a marriage license is a courtesy service of the government.
I use the term "courtesy services" as opposed to mandatory or emergency services that the government HAS to provide - police, fire, 911 service, a medical facility in every county that's been designated as the county hospital - those are all mandatory services of the government.
The fact that you can go before a court judge, a justice of the peace, or the city mayor in any town in this country and actually get married - actually have them officiate the marriage ceremony - those are courtesy services of the government. While not absolutely necessary to protect life and property like police, fire, and 911 services are, marriage licenses and the ability to go before these people and have them pronounce you as married - those courtesy services are still services of the government.
And the government has the obligation to make those courtesy services available to anyone who meets the legal requirements to obtain or use those services. If, say, Mike and Greg both just turned 18, and just graduated from high school, and now, as legal adult men, they've now decided that they're in it for the long haul, and want to get married, the government is required to provide the courtesy service of a marriage license. And if Mike and Greg want to pay the fee to go before the county judge and say, "I do", the government has the obligation to provide that service to them - irrespective of the personal beliefs of the person performing that service on behalf of the government. It doesn't matter what the personal beliefs of the county judge are, if Mike and Greg go to him or her, and pays the fee for the service, that county judge HAS to do it.
It's the same thing here with Ms Davis. The government doesn't give two good fucks what her personal beliefs are - these people are coming to your county and asking you for a marriage license. If they have the money to pay for the license, the government's position is - shut up, smile, take their money, and give them what they've paid for.
I will say one thing here, being in an open-to-the-public job myself - it doesn't matter who your customer is. You have a responsibility to make it easy for them to obtain the good or service they're looking for. You can't deny the customer a good or service simply because that customer is gay, or speaks Spanish and only very little English. You can't deny the customer simply because they're a woman, or black, or has blonde hair, or whatever. You simply cannot do that. You have a responsibility to, as best as you can, meet the customer where they are, and cater to their needs. If it's a gay couple applying for a marriage license, or wanting to actually get married, catering to their needs means, in this case, that you don't care that it's two men getting married - you issue the marriage license, anyway.
Seems odd that they get elected.
In plenty of other western countries, officials like this are appointed via a normal advertised hiring process and then bound to a code of conduct and political neutrality.
This kind of thing would just result in disciplinary action for unfulfilled duties.
In plenty of other western countries, officials like this are appointed via a normal advertised hiring process and then bound to a code of conduct and political neutrality.
This kind of thing would just result in disciplinary action for unfulfilled duties.
Or FOUR men and one woman.
When she divorced her first husband she was 4 months pregnant with twins, fathered by her third husband, but the second husband adopted them. Her second husband and fourth husband are the same man.
This reminds me of the Ray Stevens song "I'm my own Grandpa".
The Kentucky Senate President has asked Judge Bunning not to make a judgement until the Kentucky legislature can carve out a special law to protect her. The legislature is on recess until January.
This reminds me of the Ray Stevens song "I'm my own Grandpa".
The Kentucky Senate President has asked Judge Bunning not to make a judgement until the Kentucky legislature can carve out a special law to protect her. The legislature is on recess until January.
SLOPPYSECONDS
Albatross
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2007
- Posts
- 15,618
- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 0
^ she a wike doins it ten
_is it a patroitc?_
dat a Q wot wookin fa it mos ins time
anyway
tinku
_is it a patroitc?_
dat a Q wot wookin fa it mos ins time
anyway
tinku
jbrown329
JUB Addict
She's not the only one. I've heard this peckerhead before.
http://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word
http://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word
One of the male clerk yell across the room about not issueing marriage license ... very rude
And it's not rude that the woman wouldn't issue licences to anyone because God told her not to? It's Her Job!!!! She's Not A Priest!!!!
I didn't say she's not rude. But yell across the room so everyone can hear is extra rude.
They all should be sacked.
vulgar_newcomer
JUB Addict
She has certainly been making herself heard lately. She's so high on her own pedestal that she's almost side-by-side with God.
C
ClevelandTodd
Guest
She was just charged with Contempt of Court, and is off to jail! 
http://www.advocate.com/marriage-equality/2015/09/03/kim-davis-custody-contempt-court
http://www.advocate.com/marriage-equality/2015/09/03/kim-davis-custody-contempt-court
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2003
- Posts
- 12,795
- Reaction score
- 318
- Points
- 83
http://news.yahoo.com/clerk-gay-marriage-case-appear-federal-court-151835477.html
to quote the great Jackie Gleason.....and away she goes!! Ta ta Miss Christianity....enjoy jail
to quote the great Jackie Gleason.....and away she goes!! Ta ta Miss Christianity....enjoy jail
LeicsDom
JUB Addict
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-34145941
A US judge has ordered a Kentucky official jailed for contempt of court after she has repeatedly refused to issue marriage licences to gay couples.
Kim Davis, an elected official in Rowan County, has said that her Christian faith should exempt her from signing the licenses.
Leaving aside the gay marriage being against her religion argument, fundementally she is unfit for her job and therefore must be removed. It is very much the same as a Muslim person working in a food factory and then refusing to handle bacon because it is against their religion. Don't take the job if some part of it goes against your fairy tale beliefs!
A US judge has ordered a Kentucky official jailed for contempt of court after she has repeatedly refused to issue marriage licences to gay couples.
Kim Davis, an elected official in Rowan County, has said that her Christian faith should exempt her from signing the licenses.
Leaving aside the gay marriage being against her religion argument, fundementally she is unfit for her job and therefore must be removed. It is very much the same as a Muslim person working in a food factory and then refusing to handle bacon because it is against their religion. Don't take the job if some part of it goes against your fairy tale beliefs!
I don't like this at all.
(1) She will make a ton of money after this by giving speeches at christian rallies.
(2) She set out to become a martyr. She is now a martyr.
(3) The religious right will be rallying in her name for years to come.
(4) Those on the side line are now more likely to lean right because of the martyrdom of this bitch.
In other words, we just took a step backward.
(1) She will make a ton of money after this by giving speeches at christian rallies.
(2) She set out to become a martyr. She is now a martyr.
(3) The religious right will be rallying in her name for years to come.
(4) Those on the side line are now more likely to lean right because of the martyrdom of this bitch.
In other words, we just took a step backward.
Essex Boy
Recovering JUB Addict
Hold on a minute. In the "Advocate" report above she says she is "A vessel God has chosen for this time and this place" and she wants to use her office to spread God's word. First, it was the voters and not the Lord who chose her; and second, is it not illegal in the USA for her to use her position to promote her religion?
jbrown329
JUB Addict
Highlighting mine. It's suppose to be. BTW, my Christian friend called to see if I'd heard the news. She also said that Davis should go to jail.