The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Windows 8 Consumer Preview

It's in the developmental stage. Major changes can still happen. It's what I saw about Windows 7, when I was using it in beta mode... it changed definitely. There was many issues with Windows 7 at first, but they were all hammered out pretty quickly.

I think the issue here is many are very dismissive of Microsoft. And what's my agenda against Apple? I don't have anything to be jealous of their products like computers, OS, MP3 players or TV device (which has nothing on Roku, but that's another topic completely).

I think it was pretty clear from the other thread that we argued in for 5 pages. I believe you called all Mac users "superficial people who only care about how a product looks" (keep in mind, I am paraphrasing). You clearly had any extremely negative opinion of Apple and people who use the products they make. You were so anti-Apple that you refused to admit that they did some things better than Microsoft.

And their TV device is considered just a "hobby" by Apple right now. They are expected to enter the TV business sometime this year, and when they do, I know they will bring it. At their press conference on Wednesday, they are expected to unveil Apple TV 3, which should be a lot better.

I am not dismissive of MS. I hope they make it into the tablet market and succeed. I would much rather use MS software than Google's Android for example.

The way I was seeing it was not so much as microsoft making a disjointed system, or making it so people had to use tablet apps on their desktop as much as trying to make everything one system. I remember reading something a while back when 8 was announced that their idea was that windows tablets/phones/computers would all have the same system, so devs would have it a lot easier in terms of app creation and the like. Like I said, the one problem I had with the dev preview was that it just kept crashing and freezing up to the point of being unusable. I also don't want to judge the beta by its interface as Microsoft still has some time to hammer things out, and see how people react to it. What microsoft devs think and what the general public think are going to be two different things. A lot can change. I just, like I said, don't want to waste my time partitioning and downloading and installing (god knows Comcast in my area is slow as sin, so downloading would take about a day by itself) just to find out that it was just as buggy as the dev preview.

I totally understand that, but it's not the greatest idea IMO. Different devices need different OS's. The Metro UI isn't bad for a touchscreen tablet but doesn't work out so great on my laptop. Still, the whole "same system" thing I have to question. There is the whole issue of x86/x86-64 and ARM. All PC's use x86/x86-64 from Intel or AMD. Most tablets use ARM; Intel hasn't made it in the tablet sector yet. If PC's continue to use the x86 architecture and tablets use ARM, will they really be the same system? You won't be able to use desktop apps on the tablet. I am not sure when it comes to this aspect as I don't know much about software creation and how easy it would be to port software to different architectures. This may be no issue. I just don't know.

yeah copy is probably the wrong word but there is something common in the direction they're going which is unnecessarily spartan.

I wouldn't say "copy". It seems to me that Microsoft is trying so hard to innovate and to differentiate themselves from Apple that they are not fully considering that there may be fundamental flaws about what they are doing. At least, that's how I see it. Hopefully the feedback they get will open their eyes to the issues that Windows 8 currently has. I think that it could shape up to be a great OS, but only if MS fixes a lot.

I am still hoping for the ability to turn off Metro. If we can't get that, then a version completely devoid of Metro would work (perhaps for the Professional or Enterprise editions). If we don't, then no biggie. I am still a Mac user at heart and I'll just turn my attention to Mountain Lion. :D Microsoft should add these options. They need to get Windows 8 right. If they end up with another OS that has a Vista-like reputation, I think MS will suffer.
 
I have both the development version and customer customer previews running on 2 different laptops and I actually am not that impressed. It is definitely different.

From what was explained in the dev forum, there are going to be different PC versions as there are with Win 7 and there are going to be separate tablet versions. Currently both versions in the wild have both tablet and PC versions mixed in together. It will definitely be different before it hits release candidate.
 
And that's wrong of me to say? I don't really care for Apple. I could easily turn it around and say you're very anti-Microsoft and anti-PC from that thread.

Stereotyping an entire group of people IS wrong, and I take great offense to it. You are insinuating that because I use a Mac, that I am shallow and have no substance. Just because you don't care for them in not an excuse is not an excuse to bash. I don't see how you could say from that thread that I am very anti-Microsoft. In that thread I admitted that I use Microsoft products, and that I thought Windows 7 was a good OS that did some thing better than OS X Lion.

They won't get better. Won't even come close to Roku 2. Sorry. Roku 2 is open source and a much better device. Why would one want to overpay for Apple TV and not get Roku?

For you it's like Apple can do no wrong and will crush any competition with anti-competitive practices. Not with Roku, especially not with how Roku has hit the stores with a $49.99 device. Apple won't even be close to that price. Roku is open source, so I suspect Apple will remain a "niche market" at best... kinda like how they are in the computer business.

I don't think you understand how Apple works, or why people buy what they buy. How many people even know what Roku is? If they did, would they even buy it?

For one thing, Apple is going to get better. Also, Open Source does not mean anything to me. It doesn't mean it's a better product. You also say they have better devices. That's probably up for debate. However, what's not up for debate is the fact that people don't always buy what you call the best devices with the best specs and the most features. They buy what they like and they buy what they want based on other things (easiness of use, intuitiveness, etc). People would buy an Apple TV over Roku just because it's Apple. Whether that's right or wrong isn't the question. Apple has an established brand name that the masses respect. Does Roku? Not now. Hell, I hadn't even heard of them until I read your post. I asked everyone that I could too, and none of them had ever heard of Roku either (and in case you are wondering, some of those people couldn't care less about Apple).

Apple can do a lot of wrong. I don't always agree with them and I would never say they are infallible. You can't deny it, Apple has been crushing the competition in almost every sector they compete in lately. Apple has a lot of practices; they can be harsh, but they aren't anti competitive in the eyes of the law. I find it hilarious that you are bashing Apple for being "anti-competitive", but you conveniently ignore the fact that Microsoft (a company that you presumably have an affinity for) has done worse. Which company has had the Department of Justice breathing down it's neck on allegations of being a monopoly and abuse of its position? Not Apple, that's for sure.

United States v. Microsoft

I personally LOVE how you think that an Apple TV 3 (which is supposed to be in the form of an actual TV at some point) will get crushed by Roku because it's cheaper. (Roku apparently costs $50, while the current iteration of Apple TV costs $100.) People will buy Apple products no matter the cost, and they are willing to do so. Every Apple product costs more than a comparable product from a competitor. By your logic, everyone must be buying those other products because they are cheaper. Is that so? Nope. Apple is the world's most valuable company, and they didn't get there by raising prices so high that no one bought from them.

And again, Apple may remain a niche market in the TV industry. But it won't be because they aren't "open source".

Roku always come out with better devices... and they have a strangehold of that market... it's not for Apple to take really.

Oh dear. That statement just proves to me that you don't understand what Apple is capable of. Yes, Roku has probably come out with better devices. But guess what? That's because Apple hasn't really cared about TV that much. In the past 5 years they have only had two devices for TV. They didn't care because they were too busy revolutionizing the Smartphone and tablet industries.

Roku might have a stranglehold of the market, but that doesn't mean it's not ripe for the taking. All that's needed is a company that can truly revolutionize the way we consume television content...and I think that company could be Apple. Let's flash back to January 2007; Steve Jobs unveiled the first iPhone at the 2007 WWDC. It was widely panned as a failure in the making. Everyone laughed at Apple for thinking that they, a computer manufacturer, could make in in the mobile industry against giants like Nokia and RIM and Palm. Here are some quotes from that time period:

We've learned and struggled for a few years here figuring out how to make a decent phone. PC guys are not going to just figure this out. They're not going to just walk in.
-Ed Colligan, Ex-Palm CEO, 16 Nov 2006

Apple should pull the plug on the iPhone… What Apple risks here is its reputation as a hot company that can do no wrong. If it's smart it will call the iPhone a ‘reference design' and pass it to some suckers to build with someone else's marketing budget. Then it can wash its hands of any marketplace failures… Otherwise I'd advise people to cover their eyes. You are not going to like what you'll see.
-John C. Dvorak, tech columnist, 28 March 2007

Is there a toaster that also knows how to brew coffee? There is no such combined device, because it would not make anything better than an individual toaster or coffee machine. It works the same way with the iPod, the digital camera or mobile phone: it is important to have specialized devices.
-Jon Rubinstein, Palm CEO and former Apple Vice President, iPod Division, September 27, 2005

There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance. It's a $500 subsidized item. They may make a lot of money. But if you actually take a look at the 1.3 billion phones that get sold, I'd prefer to have our software in 60% or 70% or 80% of them, than I would to have 2% or 3%, which is what Apple might get.
-Steve Ballmer, Microsoft CEO, 30 April 2007

The development of mobile phones will be similar in PCs. Even with the Mac, Apple has attracted much attention at first, but they have still remained a niche manufacturer. That will be in mobile phones as well.
-Anssi Vanjoki, Nokia's chief strategist, 30 Nov 2009

What ended up happening? All of these people were wrong. Apple produces the highest selling smartphone in the world. In one fiscal quarter, they sold 37 million iPhones. None of these people thought that Apple could do it. No one thought that Apple, a seasoned computer maker, would ever be able to break into an industry that was in a stranglehold by other companies. But, they did. Apple ended up doing the same for the tablet industry, which was practically non existent. If they did all of this, then they can do it for TV as well. There is no reason that Roku should keep them from doing this. They definitely won't offer as much competition as Palm, RIM, and Nokia offered.


And one last thing. The Mac is not a niche product. It has a 10% market share in the US as of now, and it's growing all the time. Apple is the only computer manufacturer that had a consistent growth rate these past few years. The rest of the manufacturers that make PC's? They have all been declining. The Mac has a bright future.

However, I don't know why I am trying to convince you of anything. It's not going to work. I know that.
 
You've done plenty of your own stereotyping of people who do not buy Macs. And I've noticed that myself. This entire post is not on topic. But I'm going to address a few of the points you have made.

Oh really? When have I ever stereotyped PC users? Please show me, because I try to put emphases on not stereotyping people. Have I ever said that PC users are bland, boring, and lack the appreciation of style necessary to appreciate a Mac? No, I haven't ever said that like some die hard Mac users do.

Many people do know what it is. It's on many of the big name store shelves (like Target, Bestbuy, Fry's and Walmart). It has a lot of advertising too for it.
Maybe it's a regional thing. I am always in stores looking at their technology offerings and I have never seen any Roku devices. No Commercials or advertising either. I am not alone either. No one I know of has ever even heard of Roku.

Let me explain something here... Roku is definitely a better device hands down, and especially related to content and quality wise. Also Roku has features not found on Apple TV and has 1080p. It also is very easy to use, and is plug in and play. No experience required. Just go to the channel guide, and add channels you want. Simple as that. And what do you know about Roku? You're just posting opinions.

You like to throw the word "quality" around a lot. You don't define what it means to you. Do you mean build quality? Quality of software? Quality of content? Apple has fantastic build quality and software quality as well. They are reportedly in talks with networks and studios too. I don't see why Apple can't surpass Roku if they try.

http://binzaman.com/2012/03/03/how-...ustry’s-butt-where-it’s-going-next-exclusive/

"Currently, Roku has sold more than 2.5 million of its boxes. In 2011, sales tripled, and half those sales occured during the holiday season, when the company made a huge marketing push. Overall, said Wood, “Sales are huge, we’re getting 132 percent year-over-year growth on average.”

Wood said the company expects to sell 19 million boxes over the next three to four years. But for 2012, Wood said smart TVs are going to be the next focus for Roku. At CES, the company unveiled its streaming sticks, thumb-sided drives for MHL ports, which Wood said should be part of all new TV sets within four years."

==========

This is a company that is getting a MASSIVE INCREASE in profits. Downright huge. And they project to sell 19 million boxes in the next 3-4 years. Roku is already going further into the market. They are highly aggressive. So I wish Apple luck with this one.

I am not impressed. In the first fiscal quarter of 2012, Apple sold 1.4 million Apple TV.s Not bad, huh? Especially considering Roku is a "market leader" that has a "stranglehold on the market." I am not buying what you say. I am not impressed with their expectations. They can predict to sell as much as they want, but that doesn't mean that they will. Call me when they meet that goal. Roku can be as highly aggressive as it wants. Frankly, they would have no pull compared to Apple. It's not their fault. They aren't as big of a company, and they also don't have $100 billion to throw around.

The law has fell short in the regard of promoting a reasonable atmosphere of justice. And I'm not talking about Microsoft. I'm talking about other products. I haven't conveniently ignored anything. I also own Suse Linux. So saying I'm conveniently ignoring anything is false. I know what Microsoft has done in the past, as I know about AMD's somewhat wavering lawsuit against Intel.

Yes, but you call out Apple for anti-competitive practices and use that against them. You don't do that for Microsoft. They do the exact same things as Apple. Are you familiar with the secure boot loader controversy surrounding Windows 8? Microsoft is supposed to require that all ARM tablets running Windows 8 must have a locked boot loader. This is causing the Linux community to worry because they fear that MS is using this to LOCK other OS's out. Microsoft abused their power in the past, and they do so in the present.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_8#Secure_boot

Roku will have wide appeal to a mass amount of people and is indeed on the shelves of many major stores already. So whats your point here? Apple isn't going to control that market like they control the MP3 player market... it will be more like the computer market. Roku decided to move aggressively in pushing their products onto shelves. It's not my issue if you have never seen them before. In many stores they are located near where all the televisions are. Not too difficult.

Didn't you read my post? People like you said that Apple would never be a major contender in the smartphone market. Read all the quotes I provided. They were dead wrong. There is no reason that Apple can't become a major contender in the TV industry either. Roku is being aggressive. I get it, but no more aggressive than Apple is. But, Apple doesn't need to be aggressive when it comes to a potential TV and getting it onto shelves. It already has retailers like Best Buy standing in line ready to carry the product (assuming it's an actual TV).

http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1320001

Oh give me a break. What is Apple capable of doing? Coming out with superior products? Apple is hardly a shining example of quality.

It does come out with superior products, and I would argue that Apple is a shining example of quality. I am clearly not the only person who thinks so. Apple has the highest customer satisfaction ratings in the industry.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-20108336-17/apple-tops-in-customer-satisfaction-for-8th-year/

http://www.intomobile.com/2011/09/0...customer-satisfaction-sixth-consecutive-year/

http://econsultancy.com/us/blog/8664-apple-and-amazon-top-m-commerce-customer-satisfaction-charts

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2393296,00.asp

These are just a few links which validate what I say. Apple wouldn't have the highest customer satisfaction in the industry if they put out inferior products that had no semblance of quality.


Apple isn't going to "revolutionize" anything as far as TV content is concerned. They'll remain a niche company in that regard. As far as I'm concerned if you read the source I posted before, Roku already intends to revolutionize television content as they are already doing. They intend to sell close to 20 million boxes in the 3-4 years. Apple won't be it. I'm sorry, but there is already a company doing as we speak.

And why can't they revolutionize TV content? Tell me why. You aren't giving any reasons. People said that Apple couldn't revolutionize digital music players, smartphones, and tablets. And they did it all! They intend to sell 20 million boxes, but that doesn't mean anything to me. It doesn't mean they will. Roku hasn't proven themselves yet. Not to me, anyway. And why can't Apple do it? They sold 37 million iPhones and 15 million iPads last fiscal QUARTER. If they can do that, then they can sell 20 million Apple TV's in a quarter (if they are selling a set top box that is). You aren't giving me any reasons as to why Apple can't be a top contender in the TV market. I would really like to hear them. Why couldn't an Apple TV product be popular?

It's not growing that much. It's stabilizing. And many of PC manufacturers have actually been increasing. And the Mac will indeed remain a niche product. Sorry. 10% isn't big enough. Companies like Lenovo are growing rapidly too.

Wrong. Just plain 100% factually incorrect. Your biases are so blatant right now (not that mine aren't). Mac sales are steadily increasing, and they remain to do so. In December, Apple's Mac sales increased 24% while the PC industry as a whole increased just 4%.

http://blog.seattlepi.com/microsoft...-growing-at-blazing-rate-outpacing-pc-market/

Overall, Mac shipments grew 27.7% year over year in Q1 2011 (Apple's fiscal Q2) against a backdrop of a 1.2% decline in total PC shipments -- a decline than would be even sharper if the number didn't include Macs.

http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/05/22/where-in-the-world-are-mac-sales-growing-everywhere/

I've shown you statistics! How can you say that Mac sales are stabilizing and not increasing? They are increasing highly! Did CNN lie?


http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/05/22/where-in-the-world-are-mac-sales-growing-everywhere/


Yes, and it's never going to work because I don't buy into the RHETORIC.

Ditto. You posts are not convincing at all, especially since you like to ignore statistics that other people try and show you. I bet that you will not even take a look at even one of the links that I posted to try and back up my posts.

Edit: Didn't see this...
It's quite angering to me you think that Apple will simply push a company like Roku out of the picture, and take all the market share. That's the mindset of many Apple supporters.

Apple has never taken all the market share of any market they have entered. I don't think anything is going to happen. I am going to speculate on what could happen. And, frankly I am being realistic. Apple likes to take advantage of its power. They won't let Roku stand in their way if they want to make something happen, even if that means buying Roku.
 
369066.gif
 
I couldn't resist trying out Win 8 DP on my old laptop and found it to be really buggy too, but I suppose it wasn't really designed to be the most stable OS! :P

I jumped at the chance to 'update' to the CP and all I can say is WINNING!!! It's bug free (apart from a minor incompatibility issue with a few programs), runs really fast (much faster than the factory installed Win7 HP 64-bit) AND looks awesome!

The metro UI might take a bit for some to get used to, but set up right you can do just about anything a lot faster! It'll reinvent the PC experience for basic users!

EDIT: That article above really sums up my feelings well!
 
The shell replacement I use seems to work on W8 without problems. Wohoo!

Unfortunately, the project is no longer under active development. :grrr:

When the time comes at least I know I'll have an alternative to metro.

Now if I could only get KDE working...
 
Good, well-reasoned posting, Arcturus.

I'd never heard of Roku until this thread either. While it seems like a good product, it seems unfair to compare a $50 Roku which is 720p, has no ethernet, no USB, and no digital audio output, with a device that has all these things. Feature-for feature, ATV2 and Roku seem pretty evenly matched price wise. Obviously, ATV is designed for people who use the iTunes ecosystem and want to extend that to their TV.

Personally, I can't stand the Metro UI. I find it complete style-over-substance. It's dismal performance in the phone market is no surprise. In it's current Win8 iteration, it just seems like an after thought, not a truly integrated feature. MS brought it to the phone market too late, and are trying to rush it into the desktop space too quickly, without getting it right.

That's one thing Apple do well. They may bring features to their products late (cut and paste in iOS, anyone?) but they wait until they get them right.
 
Lol, I love it when someone derails a thread, then says "can we get back to topic please?", then proceeds to write stuff that has nothing to do with the thread topic! :-)
 
Good, well-reasoned posting, Arcturus.

I'd never heard of Roku until this thread either. While it seems like a good product, it seems unfair to compare a $50 Roku which is 720p, has no ethernet, no USB, and no digital audio output, with a device that has all these things. Feature-for feature, ATV2 and Roku seem pretty evenly matched price wise. Obviously, ATV is designed for people who use the iTunes ecosystem and want to extend that to their TV.

Personally, I can't stand the Metro UI. I find it complete style-over-substance. It's dismal performance in the phone market is no surprise. In it's current Win8 iteration, it just seems like an after thought, not a truly integrated feature. MS brought it to the phone market too late, and are trying to rush it into the desktop space too quickly, without getting it right.

That's one thing Apple do well. They may bring features to their products late (cut and paste in iOS, anyone?) but they wait until they get them right.

Totally. What I am trying to get at is the fact that each person has a different idea of a superior product. As someone who is heavily invested in Apple's ecosystem, the Apple TV is the superior product. I have two Macs, iTunes content, iCloud, etc. Which product is going to be superior for me? The Apple TV, which I can send content to from my Mac (or PC actually) using AirPlay.

In my opinion the Metro UI would be usable, but not on desktops. It doesn't link well with the desktop experience. Metro apps don't sync either with their desktop counterparts which I think will put off a lot of users. I think I already mentioned this though.

I've read a theory that Microsoft is forcing the Metro UI onto their entire user base in order to gain developers for the platform. Windows Phone is way behind iOS and Android when it comes to applications because a lot of developers aren't bothering to create content for them. Mostly because it might not be financially sound for them to do so, considering their minuscule user base. By integrating metro into all of their products...desktop, smartphone, Xbox...they are increasing their user base, which could attract developers. Microsoft lived in the past for way too long, and now they have to play catch up. It's not a pretty thing to watch.

I also agree with you about Apple. They don't usually do something until they know it's ready and they know that it is better than their competitors. Take 4G smartphones. A lot of manufacturers are making them now, Apple isn't. Out of all of my friends that have 4G phones, they all complain about how short the battery life is. That's why Apple didn't implement it with the 4S. They are waiting for the proper chips from Qualcomm, and once they are available, they will implement 4G. They aren't willing to take the trade offs that better specs and newer technology sometimes require, and that's why I like it. Apple values user experience better than its competitors. This is why they are successful.
 
Its an interesting experiment, but will be a failure. The duality of the system, of Metro and regular Windows UIs side by side, is the single largest weakness of the OS, and the reason why it won't find huge success. Had they chosen to separate the UIs and stuck Metro into a tablet-only version it would have made sense. Otherwise, its a really bizarre strategy.

The sad part is that, underneath that Metro skin, the changes they've made to the core of Windows are really, really great. Most people won't see them because of Metro, however.
 
Its an interesting experiment, but will be a failure. The duality of the system, of Metro and regular Windows UIs side by side, is the single largest weakness of the OS, and the reason why it won't find huge success. Had they chosen to separate the UIs and stuck Metro into a tablet-only version it would have made sense. Otherwise, its a really bizarre strategy.

The sad part is that, underneath that Metro skin, the changes they've made to the core of Windows are really, really great. Most people won't see them because of Metro, however.

Sad, but true. I like that they were really able to maximize battery life (theoretically anyway--I really haven't given it enough use to find if it was able to keep it going strong or not), and the redesign of the file system, but, as much as I like the concept of Metro UI, I don't think it is really going to be worth it with a dual UI. God knows with my grandfather, using windows 7 is a hassle, as he can't find his pictures, or he can't open word, or how to write an email, etc. etc. It's going to be too much work to jump between one UI to the next to do things that should be able to be completed easily.
 
Sad, but true. I like that they were really able to maximize battery life (theoretically anyway--I really haven't given it enough use to find if it was able to keep it going strong or not), and the redesign of the file system, but, as much as I like the concept of Metro UI, I don't think it is really going to be worth it with a dual UI. God knows with my grandfather, using windows 7 is a hassle, as he can't find his pictures, or he can't open word, or how to write an email, etc. etc. It's going to be too much work to jump between one UI to the next to do things that should be able to be completed easily.

You pinpointed the single biggest issue with Windows 8: It mixes two totally different and completely separate UI paradigms in a way that should never be done. It would be as if Apple layered the entire iOS UI on top of OSX and expected people to use it with a regular laptop or desktop. It just doesn't make any sense.

At the very least, they should have adapted ALL of the windows UI to Metro style (like they're doing with Office), so that the two UIs didn't seem so completely different from each other.
 
Some interesting comments from Ray Ozzie, the guy chosen by Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer to move Microsoft in new directions after Gates' departure. Ozzie, who left MS in 2010, says that Windows 8 is make-or-break for MS.

Ray Ozzie, the man who succeeded Bill Gates as Microsoft's tech visionary, believes the world has moved past the personal computer, potentially leaving behind the world's largest software company.

The PC, which was Microsoft's foundation and still determines the company's financial performance, has been nudged aside by powerful phones and tablets running Apple and Google software, the former Microsoft executive said.

Ozzie says that Windows 8 will determine Microsoft's place in the tech world. If Win8 fails in the market, especially the non-desktop market, Microsoft will be left far behind the likes of Apple and Google.

Ozzie said the fate of Windows 8 would determine Microsoft's future. The latest version of the company's operating system will work on tablets powered by low-power ARM Holdings chips, which Microsoft hopes will allow it to rival Apple's iPad, and put the company back at the cutting edge of consumer technology.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/...me-computer-20120309-1uo0t.html#ixzz1oZac5sYp
 
The man's final question says it all:

Linux would be the other option to going Apple.

Ubuntu is pursuing this same paradigm with their "Unity" desktop. They do it better than MS has in this Consumer Preview.

Ubuntu has however lost many users to more traditional desktop flavours of Linux as a result of this.

MS is on the same path if they presume a desktop interface focused on a touch screen paradigm isn't going to alienate users.

Here's hoping they do provide a better solution to accessing "legacy" desktop functionality in future updates.
 
I plan to stick with my windows 3.11 / 98 / XP for as long as I possibly can....
If I eventually want something new & completely incompatible(network-wize) with those I would probably be very tempted to go with Linux rather than windows 8.
(I did set up Linux on a PC years ago - but i needed the hardrive space so had to remove it)
 
^ WFW? Wow. Must be a legacy gaming rig... I hope ;)
 
Haven't played a computer game in years LOL

The 3.11/WFW one is just my general use PC (for offline stuff) like if i need to type up a text document, or a HTML file, keeping track of stuff, and for recording found files...it works perfectly for that.

The Win98se ... well I'm using it right now to type this :) basically my internet computer.

Win XP is my laptop

-----
I know all _very_ out of date :) LOL :) but does what I need
 
Back
Top