The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Women defending themselves with *Gasp* guns!


Well I obviously cant prove what they will pass but you are well aware that regulation may be offered but restrictive bans of the type that would keep you from buying the weapons you displayed is not going to happen. They cant pass a budget and with obstruction you think they will pass a hinderance to the second amendment. Please send me whatever you are taking...
 
When you try to put words in my mouth try listening first.

Then address the point YOU SAY nothing that meets the definition of "assault rile" is for sale, I provided you the definition, prove it.
 
Update. You don't actually know what I would prefer. I haven't said ANYTHING about that. The OP was being completely drama queen, trying to obfuscate, and I called him on it - you jumped in with your assumptions that are frankly yours.
 
and if you can't prove there are no "assault weapons" for sale, why did you sate unambiguously there were not?
 
Okay so you stand for nothing and you post your opinions for nothing. Worth noting.
 
Wow you can use the internet to be deceived.... None of those weapons meet the guidelines for assault weapons... so guess what WONT be banned????

.....?.....
 
Okay so you stand for nothing and you post your opinions for nothing. Worth noting.

Oh spare me, that's just dudgeon. You try to put words in my mouth then claim I have no opinion because you got spanked for it.
 
Oh spare me, that's just dudgeon. You try to put words in my mouth then claim I have no opinion because you got spanked for it.

What the fuck are you talking about? I have no need to argue vapors and haints.... so if you have an opinion then type it... if you dont then dont answer posters just cause they are acting a certain way... kinda hard to have a discussion if you are answering questions but not for real....
 
Don't get pissed at me because you got caught with your pants down.
 
I am not pissed. Amused, Befuddled, bewildered, betrayed.... but not so much pissed.

You "I say this..."

Me " Your point is invalid"

You "I wasn't saying that I just was answering the other guy cause he is dramatic"

Me "well if you don't have a point why post"

You " Don't get mad cause your pants are down"

Now did you actually have a point? Or are you just pointless seltzer water for extinguishing flaming hysterics?
 
"Weapons are used regularly to defend oneself"? Wait, wut? People have guns in their homes and don't use the nail clipper to defend themselves?

*gasp*

Someone bring me a glass of water please...




The topic is as red herring as one could possibly get.
 
Amused, Befuddled, bewildered, betrayed, the POINT was obviously not as OBVIOUS (you do know the meaning of red herring? i guess not)

as I thought.

THIS IS MY POINT! Which is actually quite clear to anyone who isn't wasting thier time being amused, Befuddled, bewildered, betrayed

The discussion of gun regulation IS NOT A SECOND AMENDMENT ISSUE trying to say it is, is trying to dodge.

Is that clear enough for you? or shall I make it bigger?
 
Amused, Befuddled, bewildered, betrayed, the POINT was obviously not as OBVIOUS (you do know the meaning of red herring? i guess not)

as I thought.

THIS IS MY POINT! Which is actually quite clear to anyone who isn't wasting thier time being amused, Befuddled, bewildered, betrayed

The discussion of gun regulation IS NOT A SECOND AMENDMENT ISSUE trying to say it is, is trying to dodge.

Is that clear enough for you? or shall I make it bigger?

So are you contending that this legislation will not be tempered by Second Amendment Fundies?

BTW you ask me if I was upset yet you appear to be the one losing your sanity...

The NRA is a terrorist Org thread is the place where we are arguing the restrictions or non restrictions. So in that thread this message may be a red herring. However on its own it is not. But you wanna make it one because otherwise you have no argument.
 
You trying unsuccessfully to be cute.

Ahhhhh poor thang ... so sorry you didn't get it but at least you already answered the question in the previous post. You're getting close to explaining yourself out of a position... keep going.
 
Since you seem to be "contending" for me, something else you just made up, you'll excuse me if I commence ignoring you.
 
Oh and please point out to me where the regulation of firearms is in the OP, since that is your position on the post.... I will wait.
 
Since you seem to be "contending" for me, something else you just made up, you'll excuse me if I commence ignoring you.

Have fun but dont worry ... you will continue to be called on making shit up as you go along. If you dont then your just ignoring every contrary post and might as well be posting in your head.
 
Back
Top