The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Worse VMA trainwreck: Paula vs. Britney

Worst VMA performance?

  • Total voters
    20
bluedragon4

bluedragon4

JUB Addict
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Posts
5,397
Reaction score
12
Points
0
Location
Phoenix
Paula!! I remember watching that in horror when I was in 12th grade. That ruined Paula career. Britney was bad but she looked pretty good to me. I am not a fan nor do I own her music but she was okay. She kinda had a "I don't give a shit" attitude.And I didn't think she would sing live. I have never seen her sing live in any show or tv concert. Paula was like a pig in a blanket. Even Paula says that's the day her singing career died.
 
I surprised the guy she stepped didn't have his back broken in the process.

Really I cannot find something to say about Britney without being vulgar. She did a sloppy performance, she looked daze and confused. She couldnt even keep up with choreography, And by Gimme more, I'm pretty sure she meant more crack or whatever the fuck she's on.
 
The whole show was a trainwreck. Not just Britney.

I was thoroughly disappointed in just about everything.
 
Paula

that was too horrifying to watch

id rather see brits performance a bunch of times than paulas
 
Both songs are pretty bad.
Paula's is cheap and extremely dated and hasn't aged well. But Paula is singing live. The only thing is she really can't sing that well, and that song was terrible.

Britney's was just boring. She seemed disinterested and in a bad mood the whole performace. She was like a robot they wound up backstage.

I'd say Britney's was the worst. Because at least Paula had interesting (although corny) things in her act, Britney just had her flabby gut.
 
Britney's so called "performance" was worse. At least Paula is singing live, and appeared to care for what she was doing even if the song was terrible.
 
Hard to decide which fat, talentless skank to dog more than the other.

Paula was singing live. Britney doens't really even sing on the record so much as make sex noises (which she proabably does in her sleep).
 
I wonder how many calls amtrack must have recieved concerning the worst train wreck in history?
 
How much damn botox did Britney have in her face to be able to show so little expression?!?! That performance was crap, even though I do like the song, you have to admit its catchy. (!)
 
Is it a prerequisite in America for your pop starlets to be off their faces on prescription medication? Don't get me wrong it's hilarious to watch but it does seem odd that these people are worshipped by the masses.
 
Wow...I'm really surprised by the responses. I don't think it's even a contest. Whether or not you liked the song or choreography or whether or not you thought the dancers were hot the fact is that Paula knew the routine and for that matter, knew where the hell she was. I'm not sure Britney even knew her own name during her performance.

Britney's may have been better on paper, but Paula's was definitely the better execution.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top