PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
I find the question they were discussing far more interesting. Should the media state that public figures they are covering are gay? Whether that be sports figures, acters, politicians, musicians, whatever?
It's a discriminatory label. Why must they be gay tennis players? Gay public figures? Gay actors? Gay musicians?
The fact the guy in the video says "my accountant says" lend the whole thing a dismissive, conspiracy theorist quality anyway. I mean honestly, the wife is a lesbian, he's Gay and the whole thing was arranged by Martina Navratalova?
Whether he's gay or not - or any public figure for that matter - it's not the place of the media to "out" them. It is for them to decide when the time is right to out themselves. As far as we know they are all out in their private lives. It's their decision as to whether they chose to publically announce it or not. The issue of "outting" people in the media is more of an ethical issue than it is a legal one in my opinion.
Why do we need to have BLACK actors, or FEMALE politicians?
Can't we all recognize ourself as simply sentient organisms, rather than all these labels of gender, race or sexual orientation?
Strange that so many female tennis stars are gay, but I can't name one male one.
Perhaps because masculine, sporty women are more likely to be gay than masculine, sporty men.
But I would love one day to see, for example, a tennis Grand Slam winner running into the crowd after his victory, to kiss his boyfriend in front of millions.
Or maybe more to the point, for him to do that, and for it not to be any big deal or controversy.
Everything I read, see, and hear from the internet is 100% true all of the time.

From a journalistic stand point, libel or defamation needs to measure up against several criteria, the most important being that it "holds the person up to public ridicule, or loss of face to the majority of the population."
It's one of the reasons so few people actually bother to sue for defamation or libel. It's a bugger to prove and it's more trouble than it's worth 99% of the time.
In the 1990's an Australian singer sued a UK Magazine for saying he was gay. The backlash he received from fans and the GLBT community alike derailed his career. He sued because he felt he was being held to public ridicule by being labelled as gay. Although he won the court case, his career has effectively been shot ever since.
I can't see someone like Roger Federer bothering to sue about something this. The fact the guy in the video says "my accountant says" lend the whole thing a dismissive, conspiracy theorist quality anyway. I mean honestly, the wife is a lesbian, he's Gay and the whole thing was arranged by Martina Navratalova?
Whether he's gay or not - or any public figure for that matter - it's not the place of the media to "out" them. It is for them to decide when the time is right to out themselves. As far as we know they are all out in their private lives. It's their decision as to whether they chose to publically announce it or not. The issue of "outting" people in the media is more of an ethical issue than it is a legal one in my opinion.

