The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Wrath of the Titans (Thumbs Up)

MisterMajestic

MisterMajestic

It ain't easy being King
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Posts
10,437
Reaction score
281
Points
0
(..|..|..|..Good...Only 90-min...)


Wrath of the Titians took in ONLY $34-Million over the weekend and was trumped by the Epic Saga Hunger Games..

It's not as good as Clash but it's still worth a trip to the theatre...The Special effects were on-point...You're gonna be surprised to find out who becomes a "Good-Guy"...It's hard to figure out what the Studio will do for part 3 considering the outcome of the Gods in Wrath....

I didnt see the 3D version of Wrath..The last flick I saw in 3D was Horror Franchise money-maker Saw...Those shades was a waste of $10-bucks...
 
i thought it was just as good as the first one. i didn't see it in the theater but it's definitely worth movie ticket prices. i have to see this in 3D. how do you know they're making a 3rd one.
 
The only way this movie is going to get 3 stars if it's out of 10.#-o
 
aberro21 said:
i thought it was just as good as the first one. i didn't see it in the theater but it's definitely worth movie ticket prices. i have to see this in 3D. how do you know they're making a 3rd one.
Click to expand...

I don't know but if it survives being Eaten by Hunger Games then a 3-Peat will probably get the green light...I predict part 3 will be all about Percy's Son...
 
I did not like Clash (2010). They put a bra on Medusa. Really? Are audiences that sensitive now where they must be protected from mythological creatures being exposed? It just shows what is wrong with movies today and paranoia with the MPAA. Of course, that was not my only issue with the film. The original told the story much better. And Sam Worthington being miscast as Perseus. Among others.
 
Isnt it time someone in Hollywood got together a Good screenwriter, Director and team of Actors to tell the story of Medusa?

Medusa gets a bad wrap and there's a back-story about her before the Snakes....There's a boatload of actresses that could play her but Angelina Jolie comes to mind...
 
^^^Who do you think should be cast other than Angie?

Some other Chick-picks I can think of are Uma Thurman..She gave us a decent Medusa for about 5-min in Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief ...Uma needs a strong come-back Flick and I know she could pull it off...

Let's not over-look that BAD-Ass Milla Jovovich from the Resident Evil franchise...She'd ROCK Medusa...

And I think the HOT Zoe Saldana would do the part justice...
 
Hmmm. Not so certain. It would require an actress that passes as universally beautiful. One that can evoke jealousy from other very beautiful women. Yet, she would need to be able to make us feel pity for her; not an easy task for a beautiful person.

The actress would need to be willing to be shown bare breasted. I know this may sound shallow. But in most art of Medusa that I see, she is in fact depicted as bare breasted. This makes sense, as any woman who is horrifically cursed for life by a goddess would not be concerned about her modesty. Showing the contrast of her most beautiful features with her most horrific on the same body is essential. That's the point of the curse.

Angelina certainly fits much of the description. I recall her role as Grendel's mother in Beowulf which I liked. She had a similar task to look beautiful and yet have a sinister character. But she may be getting too old to play the part.
 
Depends on which version of the Medusa curse you go with. In one version, she is very sympathetic from start to finish. In other versions though,she was cursed for wicked deeds.
In most versions I've seen of her though,she is topless. That shouldn't be changed just to appease people who can't stand to see breasts under any circumstances.
 
Wasn't taking this movie seriously until reading this thread. Would it be necessary to see the first one to have this sequel make sense?
 
buffxqui said:
The only way this movie is going to get 3 stars if it's out of 10.#-o
Click to expand...


tumblr_m0qvn3l1Cq1rpjfwmo2_500.gif



The fact that Sam Worthington is in it means it automatically is at least 6 out of 10 regardless of the content.
 
"as good as the first" .. oh well, good to know. the first one sucked ;)
 
just saw it. i give it 3.5 outta 10. i went for the special effects, which were ok. always neat to see monsters smashing people/stuff, but that was the only reason to bother going. otherwise it was a choppy, nothing new, horrible use of bad greek mythos, which did not even have one flash of hot dude ass in it.
 
Go see it on IMAX and in 3d .. UNBELIEVABLE !! The special effects are AWESOME ! I thought it was much better than Clash (and Clash was a good starting point too) Anything with Sam Worthington is worth going to see I could have sat in the theatre for 3 hours and been very happy. I will definitely go see it again.
 
I almost thought this was a joke until I realized you're all serious. I thought it was horrible, as bad, if not worse than the first one. 3/10 for me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top