wtf is wrong with the Clinton campaign

[JackFTwist]

reading my way through the internet I come on this story:

A recent Clinton campaign research document charged that Barack Obama was falsely claiming to be a professor:

Sen. Obama consistently and falsely claims that he was a law professor. The Sun-Times reported that, "Several direct-mail pieces issued for Obama's primary [Senate] campaign said he was a law professor at the University of Chicago. He is not. He is a senior lecturer (now on leave) at the school. In academia, there is a vast difference between the two titles. Details matter." In academia, there's a significant difference: professors have tenure while lecturers do not. [Hotline Blog, 4/9/07; Chicago Sun-Times, 8/8/04]

Today, the University of Chicago released the following statement:

The Law School has received many media requests about Barack Obama, especially about his status as "Senior Lecturer." From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School's Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/28/university-of-chicago-ob_n_93896.html

there are two wars, a recession, everything in the world, and they have time to be this fucking lame and trivial?

what's next, his kindegarden papers?

oh wait...

the Clinton campaign gets lamer and lamer and lamer with every passing day, the sign of desparate people

 

[kneelin]

reading my way through the internet I come on this story:



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/28/university-of-chicago-ob_n_93896.html

there are two wars, a recession, everything in the world, and they have time to be this fucking lame and trivial?

what's next, his kindegarden papers?oh wait...

the Clinton campaign gets lamer and lamer and lamer with every passing day, the sign of desparate people

Did he even go to kindergarten? That's probably where he learned to sit and listen and listen and listen . . . like his 20 years listening to Wright before speaking out, . . . reluctantly.

 

[Kulindahr]

Did he even go to kindergarten? That's probably where he learned to sit and listen and listen and listen . . . like his 20 years listening to Wright before speaking out, . . . reluctantly.

How much have you listened to Wright?

Just the quickie clips on YouTube?

That's like not leaving kindergarten.

 

[JayHawk]

You would have a much easier time cataloguing the good points about Clinton. Plus it saves time and ink.

 

[greydog]

Just another attack from the Clinton machine.
It seems that the Hillary campaign strategy is to throw as much mud against the wall as they can...knowing that
some will stick.

 

[Kulindahr]

You would have a much easier time cataloguing the good points about Clinton. Plus it saves time and ink.

 

[Lostlover]

Hillary knows her supporters are stupid and uneducated. She also knows they're voting with their vaginas (the men too).

She's able to smear Obama with impunity because of her stupid and moronic supporters.

 

[cowpoke212]

Lostlover, that kind of crap is really ridiculous. You should be ashamed.

 

[MystikWizard]

Hillary knows her supporters are stupid and uneducated. She also knows they're voting with their vaginas (the men too).

She's able to smear Obama with impunity because of her stupid and moronic supporters.

Have to hand it to you, Lost. You don't pull any punches and aren't afraid to tell it like it is. If the Feminists don't want to be called out on their antics, then they shouldn't do the things that stereotype them. If they get their feelings hurt, then ... oh, well. That's what happens when women (and men) vote with their vaginas, as you say. This is reckless voting, if I've ever seen it ... especially given the stunts and lies this particular woman has told. This is how absolutely desperate these Neo-Feminists are to get a Woman in the White House. They really don't give a damn about her character. Just as long as someone with a Vagina, and someone who carries a purse is elected President. Then, all will be right with the World, apparently.

They must be really upset, because not even by teaming up with the Racist Hispanics can they win this nomination.

They know that we will have a Woman President eventually. Why they insist on getting behind such a despicable one with such poor integrity, is something I guess I'll never know. But I suppose that's what happens when the emotions of Women and those within the Gay Community ... come into play in their Prejudices and Voting Decisions.

 

[texpatriot]

reading my way through the internet I come on this story:



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/28/university-of-chicago-ob_n_93896.html

there are two wars, a recession, everything in the world, and they have time to be this fucking lame and trivial?

what's next, his kindegarden papers?

oh wait...

the Clinton campaign gets lamer and lamer and lamer with every passing day, the sign of desparate people

reading my way through the internet I come on this story:



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/28/university-of-chicago-ob_n_93896.html

there are two wars, a recession, everything in the world, and they have time to be this fucking lame and trivial?

what's next, his kindegarden papers?

oh wait...

the Clinton campaign gets lamer and lamer and lamer with every passing day, the sign of desparate people

In all fairness, I'm switching some quotes here:

there are two wars, a recession, everything in the world, and they have time to be this fucking lame and trivial?

reading my way through the internet

Must not have been the "top of the news hour" when you read it.

I'm especially excited that you had the time, after prying yourself off of the cross to get up to date here, to post here since my last visit!

I never got a direct response from you.

More to the point:

Was anyone bleeding?

Did anyone die?

Did anyone involuntarily lose their "virtue?"

Any chance of this story/thread/post will be breaking the dead lock in the 2008 Democratic Presidential Primaries?

(crosses fingers)



Wake me up when y'all are through spitting all over each other, nailing yourselves, or each other to crosses, or burning witches within the Democratic Party.

Isn't Arianna Huffington a "centrist" columnist (I love her accent! She sounds so "Eva Gabor" in her comments!) who's husband didn't so much as accept blow jobs from male interns, but give them?

I'm too lazy now to do a "google" on the subject, and even if I did, someone would come along and dispute/argue/debase the results of whatever I had to share on the topic.

ISN'T THIS FUN?

It's never about the "multiplication" but the DIVISION right?!?

RIGHT?!?

I'm glad to see that you've pitched another tent for the Midnight77 and LostLover show!

YOU ROCK!

 

[MystikWizard]

I really have to hand it to the rest of the country that finally put these big states like California (my home state), Texas, New York, and even everyone's favorite swing state of Ohio all in their place. I can't tell you how many wierdos I pass on the street here that I just shake my head at ... that are actually allowed to vote. That's not to mention the huge portion that can't even speak a lick of English.

 

[Kurn]

^Most of them speak English just fine. That doesn't mean they have anything to say just because someone passes by them on the street.

Hillary Clinton is 99% on integrity.

Saying Obama isn't a professor is a fine point that the campaign mailers should not have used.
..But using Sharptonian politics is much more questionable. Questionable; note that I don't say condemnable.
..But people can question whether it represents a large error in judgment.

 

[MystikWizard]

^Most of them speak English just fine. That doesn't mean they have anything to say just because someone passes by them on the street.

Hillary Clinton is 99% on integrity.

Saying Obama isn't a professor is a fine point that the campaign mailers should not have used.
..But using Sharptonian politics is much more questionable. Questionable; note that I don't say condemnable.
..But people can question whether it represents a large error in judgment.

Thanks for the laugh, Kurn. I see we have another Comedian on the Forum.

 

[Shafted]

You would have a much easier time cataloguing the good points about Clinton. Plus it saves time and ink.

It's like finding needles in a haystack these days.

 

[Kulindahr]

Hillary Clinton is 99% on integrity.

Yep.

When she tells a lie, she defends it with every breath.

 

[Lostlover]

Have to hand it to you, Lost. You don't pull any punches and aren't afraid to tell it like it is. If the Feminists don't want to be called out on their antics, then they shouldn't do the things that stereotype them. If they get their feelings hurt, then ... oh, well. That's what happens when women (and men) vote with their vaginas, as you say. This is reckless voting, if I've ever seen it ... especially given the stunts and lies this particular woman has told. This is how absolutely desperate these Neo-Feminists are to get a Woman in the White House. They really don't give a damn about her character. Just as long as someone with a Vagina, and someone who carries a purse is elected President. Then, all will be right with the World, apparently.

They must be really upset, because not even by teaming up with the Racist Hispanics can they win this nomination.

They know that we will have a Woman President eventually. Why they insist on getting behind such a despicable one with such poor integrity, is something I guess I'll never know. But I suppose that's what happens when the emotions of Women and those within the Gay Community ... come into play in their Prejudices and Voting Decisions.

It's really the worst type of voting patters, because despite all of Hillary's antics and negative campaigning, she is still solidly in the 40's for percentage of voters supporting her.

Who else can hold such a solid number when one politician is playing dirty and the other isn't? Don't people generally gravitate towards the cleaner politician? I think so... I'd be willing to bet that that is the trend. But, Hillary's support is steady unfortunately and it goes to show that she will always have a minimum support in the low 40's.

She can't get any lower politically, but her political low, percentage wise is still solid. I can't imagine any other dirty politician still enjoying 40+% support and doing such a crappy job...

I can sort of buy the Hispanics voting to support Clinton because her husband was a great at creating jobs. But even that well is running dry as Richardson a prominent hispanic has joined the Obama wagon and hopefully will start some Spanish language commercials for Obama on Telemundo and Univision.

The women and men with vaginas won't want to kiss and make up after all is said and done. They got their feelings hurt that the shoe in female candidate wasn't such a shoe in.

And you know what? Fuck them. They're giving the Republican slime machine ammunition like I have never seen before and they're content with it. I hope Obama doesn't choose a female VP candidate to gather the females in the country on his side because I just don't think there is a qualified female VP nominee with name recognition (I like Janet Napolitano and Pelosi to a degree, but even Pelosi is polarizing though not on Clinton's level).

 

[JayHawk]

Hillary 99% on integrity....lol.

I actually looked at the date you posted that to see if it was before her own private war in Bosnia. LOL

 

[opinterph]

The women and men with vaginas

I don’t understand this reference. Care to explain, Lostlover?

 

[JayHawk]

I interpretted it as men with feminist leanings....the derogatory term "pussywhipped" comes to mind. But I can not read his mind. I think the point is anyone voting for Hillary simply because she has a vagina.

 

[GayBoyKellyCfan]

Hillary knows her supporters are stupid and uneducated. She also knows they're voting with their vaginas (the men too).

She's able to smear Obama with impunity because of her stupid and moronic supporters.

LMAO.. there is just no response to this, it's just so udderly disrespectful and the fact that nothing is done about it, time in and time out, i got nothing.. except..

LMAO.. it's soo sad how wrong one can be.