The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

2012 Doomsday: The Sagittarius Impact

After the Hindenburg crashed, a folk belief arose that if a zeppelin's shadow passed over one, death would come in fire.
 
I've got tin foil hats made up in different sizes.

You can PM me to order one.

I love this shit.
 
when stuff is exploding and people is screaming and running about imma be in bed sleeping not giving a shit. we all have to die sometime why worry about the date.
 
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXI2vzh-_EQ[/ame]
 
This weekend's Eastern USA storm has left three million homes and businesses without power. It is typical of what mainstream science has been predicting in the "new world climate order," and it also fits in well with my theories of external sources of input (snowfall) into the solar system.

There are whole threads on the "Western USA WX' and "Solar Cycle 24"(I post as "Maui" on both) fora, as well as several new NASA discoveries of water in space. NASA does not even know how we get HEAT from the Sun, much less can they account for every drop of rainwater.

Why am I posting this here? Well, as noted above, I have submit these questions for debate elsewhere. Here, I just hope to get some common sense reactions and also give my brothers a heads-up.

I am not really good at predictions, but just watch out for Katla volcano in Iceland; and watch out if the sunspots start getting really big.
 
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt bzzzzzzzzzzzzzt zrrrrrrrrrrt fzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt

I think that those are the sounds of someone frying their brain.

But it must be some good shit in that pipe.
 
ulenui said:
. . . . as well as several new NASA discoveries of water in space. NASA does not even know how we get HEAT from the Sun, much less can they account for every drop of rainwater.

Why am I posting this here? Well, as noted above, I have submit these questions for debate elsewhere. Here, I just hope to get some common sense reactions and also give my brothers a heads-up.

I am not really good at predictions, but just watch out for Katla volcano in Iceland; and watch out if the sunspots start getting really big.
Click to expand...

I'm getting sore abs from laughing.

Dude, in 300-level science at OSU I had a test once where one of the three 'problems' was to trace the path of a photon from its production in the sun's core to absorption on the surface of the earth. So not only is the process of getting heat from the sun known, it can be described in great deal every step of the way.

Every drop of rainwater? No one cares -- it's treated statistically. And it has very little if anything to do with a debris string so faint as to be essentially indedectable, but the existence deduced mathematically.

Katla volcano? I saw a TV show this week saying they're watching it already, and they didn't need some wild conjectures based on tenuous extrapolations and dubious suppositions to get them concerned.

Now, sunspots... for those to get larger than normal, either the neutrino flux is doing something bizarre, or we're drifting through a supply of fissile material... or its reverse, a dust cloud that adds extra cooling to the sun's surface. But the latter two would show up in just ordinary astronomical observations, no need for esoteric worries about that ancient debris trail.


Common sense reaction? SHOW ME SOME ACTUAL SCIENCE.
 
Increased severe weather events:

"Can violent hurricanes, floods and droughts be pinned on climate change? Scientists are beginning to say yes."

http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110907/full/477148a.html

In Letter in the Oct. 7, 2010, Nature (v. 467, pp. 696-699), Haigh et al. show that their data predicts ozone fluctuations consistent with observations yet contrary to previous predictions (data from SIM and SOLSTICE differ markedly from Judith Lean's model based on long-term observations). To quote from the abstract, "climate is out of phase with solar activity." And, as happens so often in the field of climate change, there seems to be disagreement about the effect of volcanoes.
 
As far as the cosmic origin of Earth's water, this topic was well covered in the January issue of Sky and Telescope. But can it account for floods? The event referenced below occurred on the south side of the Sun, just as the south side of Earth was experiencing floods:

NASA Science News for Jan. 12, 2011
2010 ended with an unprecedented flurry of small comets diving into the Sun. Researchers say this could herald a much larger comet still to come.
FULL STORY at
http://science.nasa....jan_cometstorm/
 
WaGWaG said:
attachment.php
Click to expand...

Slander.

Trelawney is known to have made two accurate prophecies in her career. Which is two more than anyone in this thread.
 
Pulama is Hawaiian for "torch" or "conserve."

Mahalo, and watch your step!
 
The largest sunspot in years is crossing the Earth-facing side of the Sun now. The region has already released one x-class flare, but it was not Earth directed. It could, however, impact Mercury in a way that scours material from the surface creating a temporary atmosphere.

http://spaceweather.com/archive.php?vie ... &year=2011

So I am just going out on a limb here to predict that the emergence of a large sunspot (# 1339) during a low-count cycle will correspond with increased volcanic, earthquake, and storm activity. When the great solar scientist Maunder observed giant sunspots a few months before Krakatau's explosion, he also noted a great deal of geoeffective activity. I have no idea if this proposed connection works on the short-term.
 
Keeland said:
Even if a devastating earthquake occurs, how do you propose attributing it to a large sunspot when one of the biggest quakes and tsunamis in history, sans any giant sunspot proving to be the cause, moved Japan eight feet and even shifted the Earth's axis, and before that the killer 2004 Indian Ocean quake and resulting tsunami?

Storms and hurricanes are a dime a dozen, sunspots or no sunspots; Katrina and Brownie doing a heck of a job immediately come to mind. And there are hundreds of earthquakes, large or small, every day.

If there are no huge quakes or damaging storms until shortly after or long after the flare or sunspot, how would that prove they don't cause it? When do you draw the line after a flare or sunspot?
Click to expand...

Okay, I'll relent on storms and earthquakes--but I strongly believe that there is a (rather complex) relationship between sunspots and volcanic activity. The sunspots (during a low-count cycle) before Krakatau erupted were HUGE, and appeared several months before the eruptions started. I also believe the devastating Tambora eruption is related to the Dalton minimum period of sunspot counts.

It is undeniable that electromagnetic effects of solar activity can be devastating to technology. I would miss JUB the most...

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/news/next-solarstorm.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top