2012 Doomsday: The Sagittarius Impact

[ulenui]

"Correlation does not imply causation." Statistical evidence is abundant for sunspot counts--the Chinese were observing them long before telescopes. But statistical data for volcanoes is limited--there are essentially no data for most of the Earth's volcanism, under the ocean. I have anecdotal evidence that big eruptions occur at the peak of low-count sunspot cycles; Kilauea tends to start eruptions at solar max but Mauna Loa does not.

Another line of reasoning is proof by induction--what do we see elsewhere? Volcanism on Io is definitely related to Jupiter, and the Io torus is a powerful force in the Jovian system. Saturn induces ice-volcanism on Enceladus. It would be naïve to think Earth does not respond to the Sun.

What about chemical evidence? I am suggesting the Sun induces nuclear fusion in the Earth's volcanoes, so one would look for something like tritium. University of Hawaii and BYU have not found tritium at Mauna Loa and the Galapagos, accepted science is that volcanoes do not produce tritium. Local variations are attributed to hydrological factors

Yet I have a letter from July, 2001,--from The Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Director of Office of Tritium Production, Defense Programs--clearly stating that "volcanism produces an excess of radioactive tritium ..." My Congresswoman at the time was trying to get answers for me, but after 9/11 things got really weird.

SO why am I putting this here now? I've tried politicians (too scary for them), scientists (can't think outside the box), and posting on other fora.

Just looking for input and discussion!

 

[winterknight]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZZYRCNUzmA&feature=related[/ame]

 

[ulenui]

Thanks for the comments!

I never said anything about tin hats, and apparently Winterknight is using aluminium anyway.

Mr. GiancarloC, I am a marathon runner. I have a "slow twitch" brain. It'll take me a while to contemplate your responses...

At this time, the "doom" I see coming might just be floods--but I think we need to look at Mars to comprehend the scale of flooding. The particular date is simply a cosmic alignment., at which point there will be a peak of geo-and solar-effective activity.

 

[Kulindahr]

"Correlation does not imply causation." Statistical evidence is abundant for sunspot counts--the Chinese were observing them long before telescopes. But statistical data for volcanoes is limited--there are essentially no data for most of the Earth's volcanism, under the ocean. I have anecdotal evidence that big eruptions occur at the peak of low-count sunspot cycles; Kilauea tends to start eruptions at solar max but Mauna Loa does not.

Another line of reasoning is proof by induction--what do we see elsewhere? Volcanism on Io is definitely related to Jupiter, and the Io torus is a powerful force in the Jovian system. Saturn induces ice-volcanism on Enceladus. It would be naïve to think Earth does not respond to the Sun.

Oh, good grief! The jovian volcanism on Io is due to the moon effectively being pumped by tidal forces, which both heat Io internally and crack its surface regularly.

If the sun exerted similar tidal forces on the Earth, we'd have tides higher than most tsunamis, as a regular event, and earthquakes like the one just recently in Oklahoma on a daily basis.

Earth does respond to the sun -- which exerts on us tidal forces that make maybe a centimeter difference to local coastal sea levels. Such tidal forces are insufficient to even check the cooling of the core, and essentially irrelevant to movement of the crust or volcanism.

What about chemical evidence? I am suggesting the Sun induces nuclear fusion in the Earth's volcanoes, so one would look for something like tritium. University of Hawaii and BYU have not found tritium at Mauna Loa and the Galapagos, accepted science is that volcanoes do not produce tritium. Local variations are attributed to hydrological factors

Yet I have a letter from July, 2001,--from The Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Director of Office of Tritium Production, Defense Programs--clearly stating that "volcanism produces an excess of radioactive tritium ..." My Congresswoman at the time was trying to get answers for me, but after 9/11 things got really weird.

SO why am I putting this here now? I've tried politicians (too scary for them), scientists (can't think outside the box), and posting on other fora.

Just looking for input and discussion!

Fusion? Induced how? Antimatter doesn't get that close to the ground.

Though I do recall something about tritium from volcanology.

 

[ulenui]

Kulindahr, I'll just touch on one point: regarding Io and Jupiter, no one knows what gravity is. It might just be electromagnetism in disguise... and it is undeniable that Earth is electromagnetically influenced by the Sun.

Meanwhile, today, 11-11-11, a Coronal Mass Ejection is hurtling towards Earth, a new island is appearing in the Canaries, and scientists have discovered not only the oldest cosmic gas cloud but also a link in the quest for contained thermal fusion.

 

[Kulindahr]

Kulindahr, I'll just touch on one point: regarding Io and Jupiter, no one knows what gravity is. It might just be electromagnetism in disguise... and it is undeniable that Earth is electromagnetically influenced by the Sun.

It doesn't matter: we know how gravity works, and it doesn't work like electromagnetism, disguise or not. But we also know it isn't electromagnetism in disguise, because it works between masses with no electrical charge, in fact with no electrons -- neutron stars both exert and are affected by gravity. We also know it isn't because electromagnetism is an expression of the electroweak force, which does not involve gravity.

In fact in one sense there's no such thing as gravity, there's just warped spacetime.

Meanwhile, today, 11-11-11, a Coronal Mass Ejection is hurtling towards Earth, a new island is appearing in the Canaries, and scientists have discovered not only the oldest cosmic gas cloud but also a link in the quest for contained thermal fusion.

What's new in contained fusion?

Not that it matters, since you can find significant events on any day picked at random, but I try to follow the subject.

 

[Kulindahr]

People always try to find specific events to prove their non-existent arguments... if there is a storm that hits Alaska, they'll somehow try to twist that into their arguments. As if they have a big enough understanding of how the world works. The world isn't centered around our conclusions.

But.... there WAS a storm in Alaska!

A N A S T Y one!

And it was because of those horrid cops in Oakland -- I swear!

 

[rareboy]

Dude.

You seriously need to put the ganja aside for awhile.

 

[rareboy]

 

[ulenui]

I smoked ganja once in college, but haven't exhaled yet.

Topics such as cold fusion and alternate views of physics are covered by Infinite Energy magazine (Concord, NH).

Regarding the "advance" in thermal fusion, whatever hype was probably result of review articles in Oct. 28 Science. "Breakthroughs" are common when funding is challenged.

Here, I'd like to discuss on-going and up-coming events related to the Sagittarius Impact, or whatever you want to call it, on 12-21-2012--yes, that Alaska storm was unusual. Today, look how weird the Sun is: all those spots drifting over the horizon, leaving the western hemisphere almost blank:

http://spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=13&month=11&year=2011

 

[Kulindahr]

We spent time looking at solar flares in meteorology class. That's maybe a little unusual, but hardly rare.

 

[ulenui]

We spent time looking at solar flares in meteorology class. That's maybe a little unusual, but hardly rare.

Solar flares are common, and none of the sunspots on the Earth-facing side of the Sun pose any threat. But an enormous wall of plasma--one of the largest in memory--is dancing on the Sun's southeast horizon, while a strange dark magnetic filament curls halfway around the entire Sun.

"If the filament becomes unstable, as solar filaments are prone to do, it could collapse and hit the stellar surface below, triggering a Hyder flare. No one can say if the eruption of such a sprawling structure would be Earth directed."

(from Tony Phillips at Spaceweather.com, 2011 Nov. 14)

http://spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=14&month=11&year=2011