James, i think i knew long before most American people that the USA doesnt have the resources to keep commiting troops to the war zones as it is. America is struggling, but surviving. The UK on the other hand is sinking fast. We're a country in a right old mess. Troops are only getting 5 months R&R before being shipped back out to war... they dont have the correct gear, most troops have to resort to buying the own stuff of the internet as the MoD cant provide it for them.
However that is besides the point - Any armed force be it Army, Navy and Air Force is there to defend that nations best interests anywhere in the world.
Rightly, or as it most often happens to be, wrongly, that happens, and its the way it will continue to be.
Yes as for Dresden, that was morally, legally and just about any other way justified. I agree entirely.
As for Iraq, lets just say we dont know the full truth. What we DO know, is that the Intel about the 45mins was spun - spun massively by our good friend Alistair Campbell. HE made the claim sound as though they could hit London in 45 mins. What he actually meant was that by placing a scud launcher up against the Syrian border, they could hit Israel in 45 mins.
But there is the justification. Israel is american "best interest", thus, if the Intel says that Israel can be hit by WMD in 45 mins, they have to move to defend it
I know its not right - i certainly didnt agree and dont agree with them going into Iraq - all i am addressing here is the fundamentals of how it came about and the "justification" of their actions.
Of course, as it turned out, there were no WMD. But now we're in, we cant just leave. By doing so would create a power vacume. A place of no law, where terrorists can breed, train and plot their next attacks freely against innocent civilians here.
Now, what i am about to say, is controversial, you'll hate me for it, but its the cold hard truth of the matter.
Dont you think its better that the MAJORITY of the terrorists (insurgents) are holed up in Afghanistan, Iraq etc, fighting our troops there, as opposed to killing civilians here in the UK or over there in the US?
Sure, our boys are being killed out there... but like i say, its what they're paid to do. Dont beleive me, go and apply.. i bet its on the application somewhere "are you prepared to die to defend the soverign rights of this country?"... i know its what you get asked when you apply for the UK Armed Forces.
So thus, they are defending the nations best interests...
Contraversial? Very.
Nice? Not at all.
Justified? Possibly.
True? You bet your ass its true!
Hard to beleive and understand? Ill let you decide...
Anyway, thats to derail the thread... back on topic please all.