SonOfSlobone
Wildly Inappropriate
Civil defense it turns out was actually more sinister than we realized at the time, here's why.When the film was made, the bombs were pretty small and if you were lucky enough to be far enough away, Duck and Cover made some sense. As the bombs got bigger and more powerful, it became less relevant (which is why when we had the drill in Junior High...yes, mid 70's it still was around, we would always add 'kiss your ass goodbye').
I've been cleaning out my Grandma's house and came across a pile of stuff the Government sent out in the 60's. One is an official Evacuation Map for her town...where you lived indicated what shelter you were to go to. Another is a 40 page book on how to prepare your home bomb shelter...complete with an address sticker with a code on it to tell you which pages applied specifically to HER house. It is fascinating reading although terribly useless.
In a nuclear exchange between US and Russia, the first strike would aim at the enemy's missiles, so they couldn't fire back. You didn't aim for the cities because you didn't have the capability to do both at the same time.
Then your opponent, if they had any missiles that hadn't been taken out, would aim at your cities, to punish you for having sent out the first strike.
So if you were trying to protect your people, it was against a retaliatory strike. You wouldn't do that unless you wanted first strike capability. So that means that when the government started taking civil defense seriously -- fallout shelters etc. -- we were gearing up for first strike ability against Russia. This really accelerated under Kennedy, Eisenhower wasn't that interested.
BTW, Star Wars missile shield is also a first strike weapon for pretty much the same reason. That's why the Soviet Union hated it so much -- not because they were planning to attack us, but because they were afraid we (Reagan) would attack them.










