The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Some things to know about this forum:
    If you're new, please read the Posting Guidelines. Banned content is in "List of Content Never Allowed on JUB".
    The most important thing to know: images of persons under 18 years old are never allowed here. If you cannot verify that the person in the picture is 18 years or older, don't post it.

Active Duty Does It Again...Shocking!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dink Flamingo showed his true colors a while ago when he made the comment about auditioning a black guy. He claimed that the guy stole from him during an audition. All black guys steal I guess?

I believe that Flamingo is a total predator. He finds weak guys and exploits them for all they are worth. Knowing how he has handled other controversies and the misfortune of some of his models, slimy is the only way to characterize him.

I was also stumped by JUB's decision to close the other thread. It had really slowed down to a lull. I figured it would ebb and flow based on the actions of Active Duty. I didn’t realize that members could request that a thread be closed when they felt the thread had outlived its usefulness
 
So the guy who's unconcerned about racist hatemongering is upset about copyright infringement?

Make no mistake. He's NOT really worried about it, he's selectively crying "copyright infringement" to settle a personal score.
 
Make no mistake. He's NOT really worried about it, he's selectively crying "copyright infringement" to settle a personal score.

Shit, copyright infringement?

He wants his pics posted here and the more the better. That's free advertisement for him. I wish this site would pull all his ads and photos so he's wiped clean.

Scram little pornographer. Go and peddle your dirty pics on another site.
 
Make no mistake. He's NOT really worried about it, he's selectively crying "copyright infringement" to settle a personal score.

It's called copyright bullying. It's not uncommon, unfortunately. That Dink is doing it increases my certainty that I'm right about his lack of moral character.
 
It's called copyright bullying. It's not uncommon, unfortunately. That Dink is doing it increases my certainty that I'm right about his lack of moral character.

Moral character. It's called properly crediting the rightful owner of copyrighted material. I find it funny that every other picture on his thread has the rightful owner credited EXCEPT the ones owned by me and Dirty Bird Pictures.

I have no personal score with anyone here. All six of you.
 
Moral character. It's called properly crediting the rightful owner of copyrighted material. I find it funny that every other picture on his thread has the rightful owner credited EXCEPT the ones owned by me and Dirty Bird Pictures.

I have no personal score with anyone here. All six of you.

What are you even talking about? Except for leaving pictures out so that none of them were full sets and reducing their sizes so they weren't full resolution, NONE of those pictures were edited to crop ANY existing logos and were all posted as found. You may want to talk to Brent if logos were left off of your "summit" pictures because they exist that way on his pay-site, where they came from.

You DO have a personal score to settle as referenced by the fact that you only brought it up because you disliked what I said. I already HAVE all the pictures so it's not even me your spiting, it's everybody else but, whatever...do what you will.
 
And let me say, regardless of my personal feelings on the Axl issue and how it has been handled, I am voting AGAINST the ad hominem attacks that are being launched against Dink.

Not the issue here!

Stay on focus boys, you're all better than that.

Edit: Except for JaredPad.....he's the WORST! :p
 
This is turning into a pissing contest again. Stop it. LFAH is right; it obscures the point, and that works to the benefit of those who want to pretend that this is personally vindictive instead of being about a matter of principle, which is that racism must not be tolerated.

Please stop baiting and taking bait. It will not help. And when you talk about Dink's personal appearance it only makes him feel justified in dismissing our criticism of his behavior, which is the issue here.
 
You guys leave them alone. Don't watch it if you don't like it. You guys talk more than Ladies.
 
A trainwreck called... it can't believe how bad this thread has gotten.
Axl's images have all been banned from this site,the word about getting a boycott and whether or not people want to go to Active Duty has gotten out. What more is there to accomplish here?
At this point, this thread has decended into what the other one did, a thread about racism and this model to a insult contest between everyone involved.
Insulting someone's physical appearence or posting history means you've already lost your argument. As for Dynk,just keep throwing gasoline on that fire. Most webmasters come here to promote their product,not engage in flame wars with other posters.
 
You people have seriously gone off the fucking deep end. Fucking jerk off, wipe up and get on with your goddamn day already people. We're still talking about porn right?
#-o
 
45 posts deleted. numerous others edited.

And people wonder why we can't have nice things and why the previous thread was closed.

Yes you have every right to discuss this topic, but you do NOT have the right to use it to trade personal insults and throw unfounded accusations around.

I'm not prepared to spend an hour on this thread every morning when there are numerous other threads and Post Reports that need attention too.

Abuse it - you lose it.
 
Quasar, I disagree....Closing the thread made sure no one else would voice their opinion in there. Now people will have to search for the thread to understand what this thread is about and since Dink has deleted his more inflammatory posts have been deleted it's as if no one gets the whole picture.
CXXX..|
I refer you to what has just happened in the last 24 hours to THIS thread. Nothing new on the subject was added. People continued to express the same opinions in variouis different combinations of words, and then resorted to personal insults and accusations because they still had a difference of opinion. In addition, none of Dink's posts were deleted from the original thread - he was referring to the printed copy of that thread that he was giving to Axl to read, where he had deleted his comments. ..|
 
If I had my wish...

...there would be no flamebaiting in this thread.

...failing that, the response to flamebaiting would be not flaming but reporting and flagging ("This is flamebait. If you respond by flaming, HE WINS."). Please note: not all expressions of anger are flaming. There's going to be a lot of anger on all sides about this. I'm pretty angry when I see a "14" or "88" tattoo.​

...Axl himself would come here and share his views, under an ID vouched for by Dink.

...whatever he said, the response to him would be measured, and no one would flame him or call him names (as noted above, "you are racist" is not namecalling).​

But as Crichton said to Chiana, "Since when do people like us get what we want?"
 
As you may know, my concern is the issue of identity…the issue of a person giving themselves an identity which will last until the day they die.

I believe in the ideal expressed in Críostóir's signature line above … and I say that an immature, unevolved person who brands themselves is limiting and foolish.

We have no idea how we'll evolve in the decades to come but I assume this kid in the link below knew he'd be shunned and persecuted if he were living in the USA in his grandfather's day.

http://www.seancody.com/page.php?frame=movie&movie=1266

mccarthyism.jpg


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism
 
I believe in the ideal expressed in Críostóir's signature line above … and I say that an immature, unevolved person who brands themselves is limiting and foolish.

Because I will change my signature line at some point, I'm just going to say that at the time the above was posted, it was "If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities. -- Voltaire (1694-1778)."
 
As you may know, my concern is the issue of identity…the issue of a person giving themselves an identity which will last until the day they die.

This. I predict that before long there will be a new and rapidly-spreading mental disorder identified as TRDD - tattoo-regret-depressive-disorder. And/or that someone will make millions figuring out an effective and painless way to remove the horrendous, no-longer-wanted body painting.

I have to laugh (and cry) thinking about what things would be like today if all the baby boomers who were rabid, idealistic, free-love anti-war protesters in the 60's had painted themselves back then with anti-war and other tattoos espousing sentiments that many of them would consider "evil socialism" today.

What you believe (or find attractive or cool) at 20 can be worlds apart from where your mind is 20+ years later.

The hideous tattoos that predominate at AD these days -- and I'm speaking purely from an aesthetic viewpoint -- is yet another reason that site is yesterday's news as far as I'm concerned.
 
What I used to say was "Think of the t-shirts you wore ten years ago. Would you wear them now?"

Of course, today...I would. But I'm older and don't change as quickly. But in previous decades, I really had the three-wolves-howling shirt...and worse. Someone with a three-wolves-howling tattoo would be a VERY SAD PERSON today.
 
And that's really why I want to hear from Axl. If he said "I was a dumbass kid and got the tatts because I hero-worshipped my older brother and he had them" or "I used to be a racist asshole and got these tatts back then...and now I'm ashamed of them but can't afford to get rid of them in any way that wouldn't leave horrible scars, so part of the reason I'm doing porn at AD is to pay for the laser treatments to have them removed" -- well, that would be a start.

I'd ask why he doesn't have the 14 and 88 blocked out, of course. And now that I've said the above, he'd have to do more than just quote those lines for me to buy it.

And that, in turn, is why I wanted Jasun (as a party who a. I don't think is a racist, b. is on friendly terms with Dink and c. has a video blog) to interview Axl on camera, so we can assess his sincerity or lack of same for ourselves.

Jasun doesn't believe it would make any difference, and also he's understandably annoyed by the number of people who tell him what he should vlog. I've apologized to him for that.

Why the other things haven't happened I don't know. Obviously it's Axl's choice. The level of flame and vitriol on these threads may be one reason. Would YOU voluntarily go somewhere where a bunch of people are almost guaranteed to do the verbal equivalent of throwing shit at you?

Of course, he could also be sitting there laughing and thinking "Look at all them mud people and race traitors* with their panties in a bunch! Haw haw haw!" There's no way to know, and I think probably we never will know.

*Race traitor, c'est moi. And proud of it!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top