All Eyes on Oregon Marriage Case

[rareboy]

I think it boils down to consideration

[Damn -- left to go get Bammer some water, came back, and haven't the slightest clue what I was going to say. Maybe I've been a bit heavy on the "special cookies" for pain.]


It would be nice to know the court's reasoning on the two cases.

ahem.

did you bring enough for everyone?

 

[Kulindahr]

ahem.

did you bring enough for everyone?

These, I wouldn't dare. They were experimental, and the damned things are so powerful that when I ate one of the big ones I went past humor and being stoned to paranoia.

The other day it took a third of one to deal with my pain while I was working at the conservation project. It handled the pain, but I kept forgetting what I was doing.

 

[Alnitak]

Motion to Dismiss filed with the 9th Circuit

http://www.scribd.com/doc/229559216/14-35427-36

The Supreme Court has made it clear that “Article III standing ‘is not to be placed in the hands of ‘concerned bystanders,’ who will use it simply as a ‘vehicle for the vindication of value interests.’” Hollingsworth, 133 S. Ct. 2652, 2668 (2013) (quoting Diamond, 476 U.S. at 62

 

[JackinSea]

I think that qualifies for an "Oh, Snap!"

 

[Ninja108]

Motion to Dismiss filed with the 9th Circuit

http://www.scribd.com/doc/229559216/14-35427-36

They are lowering the boom aren't they?

 

[Kulindahr]

Motion to Dismiss filed with the 9th Circuit

http://www.scribd.com/doc/229559216/14-35427-36

I read that and my mind was like