Re: Columbus Day, the history, the people, the fuss, and whatever it all means
Still waiting to hear from you, who do I throw shit at?
Let's recap shall we? Right out the gate you came in with your "Stop being mean to wypipo" armor, sword and shield.
Of course in this day of anti- Americanism it will afford some an excuse to make venomous remarks (as if they would wait for an excuse).
In your world, criticizing a man who never even set foot in America is... anti-American?

This makes so little sense it would befunny, except you're serious.
I always saw it as a government holiday, so I need not check the mail.
And you have no problem with a government holiday supporting a man who ran a child sex ring? I'm going to keep asking til one of you acknowledges this, because we're almost 3 pages in and his fans have said NARY a peep about it.
On a smaller scale, what has been happening since man made the scene with the stealing of land and the slaughter of innocent people is comparable to a gang of thugs taking over a neighborhood.
Color me surprised, even in a thread about a white terrorist, your villain is..... brown people.
This desire to conquer and take what one wants seems to transcend all nationalities and skin tones.
Of course, we can discuss black criminality and violence, but when the perpetrator is white "Hey, back off, everybody does it, it's just nature man." Once again, you find brown villains in a thread honoring a man who used them as doormats. You keep saying everybody's obsessing over white sins, maybe you feel that way because you give them a blanket free pass for theirs.
Man is tribal, to sanctimoniously condemn past exploits while ignoring what goes on under our noses is hypocritical.
Ahh, no discussion about violence is complete without telling black people "Shut up about white violence til you fix your own neighborhoods."
They were such nice people.
Here, you MOCK Columbus' victims, who
he himself described as peaceful. You tried like hell to insinuate the opposite, which would work if you were speaking to an ignorant person who didn't know better. Hopefully you've abandoned trying to justify their enslavement with "Well they were savages anyway," I don't think even you need someone to explain how that's deeply racist.
The sjw crowd likes to claim that the 'indians' were just kind noble people and another group victimized by the evil white man.
And here you are again derailing with your "poor white guy can't catch a break" routine. It's gotten stale, but you're allowed to throw a million race cards if you want, nobody's going to take you to task for it.
The troubling part isn't in hearing the truth, it's the idea of using this truth to spout off about 'white supremacy' and further the agenda of anti Americanism.
Most of the words you're using don't even make sense in the way you're using them. Anti-American? Columbus was an Italian who never set foot in North America-- the white America, the one you refer to by default as if there isn't a gigantic second hunk of continent beneath us that is also "America." Albeit the brown one.
So, lemme make sure I'm up to speed.
It's ok that Columbus enslaved, raped and tortured because gangs.
It's ok for our government to celebrate a sexual predator.
Any attempt to criticize Columbus is anti-white anti-American death-to-whitey hate speech?
What Twilight Zone am I in? Who else has a holiday in this universe? R Kelly? Harvey Weinstein? Jeffery Dahmer? OJ Simpson? Chris Brown? Bill Cosby? George Zimmerman?