The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

And Let's not forget about the other Deplorables

I would say the majority are too busy with life and working to belong to any group.
Other than the description, "gay people," my question does not relate to membership. Stating that most gay rights groups have been "taken over" implies that some groups have not been taken over. Similarly, stating that the majority are "too busy" implies that a minority is not. I am attempting to understand why the distinction is significant. What is the value of your observation?
 
I will quit on this subject at this point. I now accept this is now no longer just us boys for homosexuals.
This forum is for Gays and Trans people. I accept that and will respect that. I think that is fine if that is what ownership and admins decide. This is only my opinion but I think maybe in the future that might need to be addressed somewhere in the forum, and if it is I apologize that I missed it.
 
I will quit on this subject at this point. I now accept this is now no longer just us boys for homosexuals.
This forum is for Gays and Trans people. I accept that and will respect that. I think that is fine if that is what ownership and admins decide. This is only my opinion but I think maybe in the future that might need to be addressed somewhere in the forum, and if it is I apologize that I missed it.

I have no idea what this even means.

It reads like you don't want to address any of the comments made to you because you either can't argue them, or you were just baiting and uninterested in discussing, so you tossed this jumble of unrelated things out there as an escape hatch.
 
I could defend my positions very well. I enjoy the other sections of this forum too much to take a chance of being banned. This forum is anti-Gay center to conservative and very pro-TQ I A and what other letters they have added, and that is their right. There are plenty of places available that are for Gays only. Yes, I am a supportive member of the LGB Alliance.
 
The best Internet Research Agency ops were trained to avoid being banned. The boss knew how all this works.

I really don't care if if we have TERFs on here and I actually have some respect for those homos who declare their discomfort or non-allegiance.

So there's that.

I have no problem accepting that the definition of 'Boys' can be incredibly broad. And that is me. I feel no ownership of Cis-gendered male and boydom. I am quite adaptable and willing to support anyone in their search and realization of their identities

IT LITERALLY COSTS ME NOTHING.

I only hope that everyone here relaxes and realizes that the world is big enough for everyone.

I only feel disgust for those who politicize sexuality in order to punch down or limit human rights and freedom to be who they want to be. Period.
 
Anytime I hear someone bitching about LBGEQI&&WT%GTREJ*U*&EYYUEOEBIK$KKTKKE...........................

I am tempted to start screaming that our salvation is in inclusion, accepting people for who they are, and if the acronym gets infinitesimally long because people of all kinds want to join our alliance and add a letter of their own, THAT ONLY MAKES US STRONGER!

I don't care where you put your cock, what you wear, or what you want to marry. Be yourself, add a letter, and come sit by me. The only rule is tolerance for intolerance is a bullshit oxymoron and if that's you. you go fucking sit at the shit table.

I think straight people who join the fight should get a letter too...
 
So many homos in the western world fail to realize that all of their rights started with Marsha Johnston and her peeps art Stonewall.

Ours in Canada were ignited by Stonewall and the bathhouse raid protests.

I am able to welcome anyone to my table who is fighting against early 20th century cis-het standardized sexuality. As long as it is between consenting adults.

But I also recognize that the actual identification of sexuality and gender preference happens at a very young age for many.

And to the haters.

Fuck the fuck off. You know nothing.
 
I could defend my positions very well. I enjoy the other sections of this forum too much to take a chance of being banned. This forum is anti-Gay center to conservative and very pro-TQ I A and what other letters they have added, and that is their right. There are plenty of places available that are for Gays only. Yes, I am a supportive member of the LGB Alliance.
The issue, on this subject, is how you're presenting your argument.

If you don't agree with some of the main LGBT organizations' priorities (e.g. HRC, which you mentioned previously), that is a perfectly valid topic.

The issue is how you presented the topic as "far-left radicals that have taken over most Gay rights groups" which is another issue. After 1969, most of the gay rights organizations trended progressive or left. That is nothing new.

On your questioning of the alphabet soup of LGBT+, you are in good company. Frank Kameny, one of the earliest gay rights leaders, gave an interview before his death where he cautioned about the growth of identity politics and how that was a danger to the focus on equal rights for homosexuals.

 
^ I read about that earlier and my first thought was, "How can a Republican not know how to count to 'one'?"
 
Or it was put up by one of Putin's employees who really didn't know any better.
 
Or it was put up by one of Putin's employees who really didn't know any better.

It was posted on the official @GOP account.

(Yeah, there are probably Putin employees there, too, but they at least live in the States and should know the flag.)
 
It was posted on the official @GOP account.

(Yeah, there are probably Putin employees there, too, but they at least live in the States and should know the flag.)
In our lovely digital age, there is no reason they wouldn't be in St. Petersburg!
 
In our lovely digital age, there is no reason they wouldn't be in St. Petersburg!

What, they'd be hacking into the official GOP Twitter account? The GOP can pull off foolishness like this all by themselves ...
 
The GOP these days is a wholly owned subsidiary of PutinCo.
 
I saw another article about that yesterday. It seems that there are some deluded trogs out there who think Toad is going to part with some ecash to save their hides.

I have to give a big

:rotflmao:

To Trogs who think that the basic Grift of Toad is going to allow them to profit in any way from the horde's donor cash it sucks up while their major donors run for the hills.
 
So it will end up being the super donors and their PACS that end up bankrolling next year through dark money and likely not for Trump or
Trump candidates.

The mid-level donors are smart to figure out that their dollars aren't going to help their candidates and causes...they are being siphoned off by the hucksters and grifters keeping the Big Lie going.
 
Toad is going to turn Az and GA Blue. A'int that a kicker.
 
Back
Top