The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

And Let's not forget about the other Deplorables

From the article noted above, but there are also others saying that the immunity decision will help demolish the case against Trump.

Some legal experts, including Vance, point to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ separate concurrence in the Trump immunity case as giving Judge Cannon the roadmap to come to this decision.
Parenthetically, she explained, “In the Trump immunity case, Justice Thomas wrote separately to suggest the special counsel was unlawfully appointed; the reasoning laid out the roadmap for this (wrong) result/decision.”

“Justice Thomas strikes again,” wrote professor of law Melisa Murray. “Not only did a majority of the Court give presidents almost unfettered license in the immunity case, Justice Thomas concurred separately to question the constitutionality of the special counsel. He laid the table and Judge Cannon took a seat.”

The immunity case has helped lay the groundwork for this dismissal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
there are also others saying that the immunity decision will help demolish the case against Trump.

The dismissal may serve as another delay, but should not demolish the case. Of course that assumes the next administration doesn't absorb the functions of the Department of Justice and determine to drop the case.

... so US attorneys will absolutely be permitted to pick up where Jack Smith left off. Just means they'll have to re-bring the case, put it back before the grand jury, read the grand jury transcripts, vote the indictment back into existence, and then put it right back on track to be tried and hopefully it will not be in the hands of Judge Canon -- it will be in the hands of a fair impartial independent judge.

Judge Cannon DISMISSES Trump's Classified Documents Case; This May Ultimately Be BAD News For Trump (Glenn Kirschner; YouTube video; July 15, 2024)
 
The dismissal may serve as another delay, but should not demolish the case. Of course that assumes the next administration doesn't absorb the functions of the Department of Justice and determine to drop the case.
And where do you think America is at today?

Trump still remains utterly unaccountable for anything and everything.

The documents case is over. And we all know it. The SC will rule that he was exercising his official powers and grant him immunity because there is no way that Congress would pass a law that would define the details of what constitutes an 'unofficial' act of treason.

Face it.

They have won. The US will look like a Kremlin inspired oligarchy within the decade with the billionaires stripping the assets bare.

The US is not just sliding into a banana republic...it is hurtling itself willingly into it through complaisance and complicity. Once project 2025 is in place, all the law in the country will only ,mean what the far right, religious factotums of the trillionaire class want it to mean. And all the petty bourgeousie lawyers and minor judges and burgermeisters won't count for shit unless unless they are penning decisions and policies that conform to the will of 'el presidente'.
 

I once wrote a letter to a company to express my dissatisfaction with their service and to explain to them exactly what they were doing wrong, IMO. They not only reached out to thank me for the input, they hired me to take over the function about which I had written.

The problem with Democrats is that they cannot seem to discover what is wrong because they are not bold enough to discuss how to fix it.


“Fate whispers to the warrior, 'You can not withstand the storm.'​
The warrior whispers back, 'I am the storm.'”​
 
The problem with Democrats is that they cannot seem to discover what is wrong because they are not bold enough to discuss how to fix it.
The problem is that fixing our broken system will piss off the people both political parties actually serve, like the military industrial complex, big corporations in general, the political elite, etc. So I don't expect any attempts at bold discussions. It's better for their interests to scream Trump-Trump-Trump, while conveniently ignoring past policy that pissed voters off enough that they decided: We might as well try the reality show host! What have we got to lose?

This is why I think a new political party is necessity: a party that actually exists to serve the interests of ordniary people can talk openly about the problems we have and how to fix them.
 
...The problem with Democrats is that they cannot seem to discover what is wrong because they are not bold enough to discuss how to fix it.
Democrats often know what the problems are. But they seem to have attention deficit disorder when it comes to developing a long-term strategy for fixes... and they're notorious for self-sabotaging (i.e. "It will never get through the Senate" or "Remember what happened in [insert past year/date]!").

But stealing, concealing and lying about classified materials is not a Dem or Republican issue. If the DOJ lets this one go, especially on a technicality with a specious legal theory, they will weaken their ability to pursue similar cases in the future.

The problem is that fixing our broken system will piss off the people both political parties actually serve, like the military industrial complex, big corporations in general, the political elite, etc. So I don't expect any attempts at bold discussions. It's better for their interests to scream Trump-Trump-Trump, while conveniently ignoring past policy that pissed voters off enough that they decided: We might as well try the reality show host! What have we got to lose?

This is why I think a new political party is necessity: a party that actually exists to serve the interests of ordniary people can talk openly about the problems we have and how to fix them.
"The people [who] both political parties serve" don't vote. The people vote. And the people are constantly complaining about the unfairness of a system where money buys influence and unequal justice. The polls show that the American public are in favor of change, yet only a small percentage of people consistently vote for candidates based upon their platforms, and they don't hold their elected officials accountable for promises made.

The most serious problem is that the majority of Americans take democracy for granted. Problems are only addressed with they fall into the "What about us?" category.
 
Last edited:
"The people [who] both political parties serve" don't vote. The people vote. And the people are constantly complaining about the unfairness of a system where money buys influence and unequal justice. The polls show that the American public are in favor of change, yet only a small percentage of people consistently vote for candidates based upon their platforms, and they don't hold their elected officials accountable for promises made.
The people may vote, but more often than not, the only choice is the lesser of two evils. Particularly when it reaches the level of the presidency. In normal elections, either candidate will be just fine for the interests of the elites. Based on 2016 and 2020, it's very clear to me that the "Democratic" Party will make sure that anyone who is not "acceptable" will lose, even if they have to engineer things in favor of a candidate that no one really liked (2020).

The unfortunate thing is that the only way of holding politicians accountable is refusing to vote for them again. But you even suggest that with some positions, you get push back because the other candidate is so much worse. And if a candidate loses, chances are he or she will be replaced with someone who will be just as bad.
 
From FB today. I don't know if this is true because I don't have a broad or deep understanding of 501c3's. But I suspect it wouldn't matter anyway because Project 2025 will just be adopted by a qualifying organization that is allowed to do this.

Did you know that you can directly oppose the Heritage Foundation? As a 501c3 corporation, the Heritage Foundation is not allowed to participate in politics, let alone publish political manifestos. You can download Project 2025 pdf from the website and attach it to IRS Form 13909 and challenge their tax exempt status.
Here's their EIN # 23-7327730
Money is the only weapon. Here is your second American Revolution. Right here. It doesn't take that long to file.
 
The people may vote, but more often than not, the only choice is the lesser of two evils.
That's rarely the case. More often, it's because there really isn't a choice. Gerrymandered Congressional districts, lack of term limits, lack of reasonable controls on campaign donations and tinkering by special interests limit the available choices that voters have. But, as I've said before, the problem isn't the politicians, it's us because we allow it to happen.

How many times does a candidate claim they are going to "fix Washington"? That's not their job. Their job is to represent their constituents.

There are solutions like eliminating primaries and replacing races with ranked choice voting. The key is candidate recruitment, and an examination of how the public treats politicians who are in office... and how they treat each other.
 
That's rarely the case. More often, it's because there really isn't a choice. Gerrymandered Congressional districts, lack of term limits, lack of reasonable controls on campaign donations and tinkering by special interests limit the available choices that voters have. But, as I've said before, the problem isn't the politicians, it's us because we allow it to happen.

How many times does a candidate claim they are going to "fix Washington"? That's not their job. Their job is to represent their constituents.

There are solutions like eliminating primaries and replacing races with ranked choice voting. The key is candidate recruitment, and an examination of how the public treats politicians who are in office... and how they treat each other.
If the voting public acts like a passive herd of biddable cattle, that's exactly how we get treated. If we want change, WE have to make it. The system is not so far gone that this is impossible - YET. Give Toad the chance by whining about Biden and pretending that's "principle" WILL elect people who want to end the possibility of change once and for all.

I don't give a good God Damn who the Democrats nominate, that is the ONLY possibility this election - there is literally no other choice if WE intend to keep our choices for the future.
 
When your plastics guy also hates you...

image.jpg
 
If there was ever any doubt that Brand was just another low level grifter....
image.jpg
 
TOAD ATE LOU DOBS!!!!

(KTLA) – Political commentator Lou Dobbs has died at the age of 78, former President Donald Trump announced on social media Thursday. Trump, whom Dobbs publicly supported, announced the passing on his Truth Social account...


Hate to be crass - hell, who am I kidding. First round is on me!
 
TOAD ATE LOU DOBS!!!!




Hate to be crass - hell, who am I kidding. First round is on me!
tenor.gif
 
Back
Top