Annoying Habits of Jubbers

[LilBit]

Pffft! Becky puh-leeze!

They're an A cup at best, and I'd hardly call them "man boobs."

I posted a pick in one of Lefty's threads in the JUB Supporters Club forum, but that thread got yanked.

Not because of the excitement that it caused looking at my pecs, but for other reasons.

Because nekkid pics of you violate the rule against necrophilia?

Oh, and to remain *cough* on-topic in this discussion.

Annoying habits of JUbbers?

When they post comments like



It can be a little awkward in the middle of a CE&P Thread.

But here in Hot Topics?

It can be a nice diversion.

And that, my dear, is why I steer clear of CE&P.

 

[Centexfarmer]

Because nekkid pics of you violate the rule against necrophilia?

Only when I'm fucking you Becky.

And that, my dear, is why I steer clear of CE&P.

They'd eat you up and shit you out before they even had the chance to digest you.

Bless Your Heart.

You do know that I love you live a Brother don't you?

Have you checked out some of the incest threads in the Fetish Kink & other Porn forum lately?

Made ya look!

 

[MarkDW]

People that create threads about annoying Jubbers

 

[Centexfarmer]

5.) Knee-jerk straw man/ad hominem overreactions to people they disagree with on trivial bullshit, therefore, turning the most innocuous threads into unnecessary bitchfests.

6.) Boasting about their lack of sympathy and compassion for those less fortunate for them, for any reason, as if being a cold, heartless bastard is some kind of virtue. I can understand simply feeling that way for valid reasons, but to go out of your way to be obnoxious about it or antagonize certain people is overkill.

Or a 2011-2012 Gay Republican.

Apparently there's some "virtue" in that, but they've yet to share what that virtue is here.

AWP82 I read most all of your posts, and if there's some "troll/sockpuppet" getting on your nerves, confuse them with facts and logic.

They never respond to direct questions, or even actually participate within their own threads.

I like fucking with them.

You know, poking them with a proverbial stick?

You have to be extremely careful with them though.

They're quick to play the victim or martyr, and they're prone to incite normally decent respectable members of JUB into fits of rage causing them to openly violate the Terms of Service, Code of Conduct, and whatever Posting Guidelines of which ever Forum that they post in in which you wish to respond.

While they cower back, and point their boney little fingers and laugh.

So yeah, that's annoying.

 

[Telstra]

I am annoyed by people posting in general .....

 

[Centexfarmer]

I am annoyed by people posting in general .....

You know that there are other User Groups/vBulletin type message boards available out there?

This message board comes to mind:

Oldsmobile engine casting number identification

I think that the last post anyone made in that forum was a couple of months before anyone started posting here back in 2004-2005.

 

[palbert]

I am annoyed that this Thread is on page 4.

 

[Telstra]

You know that there are other User Groups/vBulletin type message boards available out there?

Didn't you realized i was joking ?
Now i'm annoyed by you.


Nah, just joking again.
I like most of the people here.

 

[Centexfarmer]

Didn't you realized i was joking ?
Now i'm annoyed by you.

You do realize that's the premise for most Hollywood "romance" movies don't you?

They're annoyed by each other, and by the time the credits roll either we're left to believe that they went off and made "babies" together, or that there's a sequel in the works?

If you're more than 5'9" tall I climb you like a pole.

If you're shorter than 5'9" tall, I'll build a "cubby hole" for you, and give you a safe place.

Nah, just joking again.
I like most of the people here.

Yeah! Me too!

 

[Centexfarmer]

My post wasn't directed at anyone in particular. It was a general statement about various posts (by various people, on various subjects) I've read over the years. Just a pet peeve.

I'm not really sure who you're talking about, though. If you're implying that I've broken any rules while responding to anyone, I apologize. I wasn't aware of it if/when I have.

Mine too.

You and I just happened to be in agreement with each other.

RELAX!

We're laughing WITH each other, and not one toward another.

 

[pat grimshaw]

I'm rather annoyed by the habit of people quoting the complete text, holus-bolus, in their reply.

 

[navigaytion]

Let's be honest--this thread was never meant as anything other than a bitchy way of digging at others. The fact that it's taken the tone it has is not surprising at all; it was the logical progression from the negative intentions that began it.

Not really true. I kept it anonymous for a reason and hoped everyone else would, and also encouraged everyone else to contribute to it. But, as I mentioned in one of my updates above, people took the opportunity to once again get into arguments with me and what I post, instead of contributing to the thread topic.

 

[Centexfarmer]

Not really true. I kept it anonymous for a reason and hoped everyone else would, and also encouraged everyone else to contribute to it. But, as I mentioned in one of my updates above, people took the opportunity to once again get into arguments with me and what I post, instead of contributing to the thread topic.

HELLO!

YOU ARE THE OP = Originating Poster.

You didn't lay out any ground work early on in your thread, that you were the only one that could point out any perceived hypocrisy (which seems to be your thing around here on JUB), and when it's tossed back claim that you don't know what they fuck that anyone is talking about, and try to change the subject, or BITCH that anyone would bring it to your attention.



I'll shut this whole mofo of a thread down. Just give me the word.

 

[navigaytion]

HELLO!

YOU ARE THE OP = Originating Poster.

You didn't lay out any ground work early on in your thread, that you were the only one that could point out any perceived hypocrisy (which seems to be your thing around here on JUB), and when it's tossed back claim that you don't know what they fuck that anyone is talking about, and try to change the subject, or BITCH that anyone would bring it to your attention.



I'll shut this whole mofo of a thread down. Just give me the word.

In the end, I don't care if it's tossed back at me, and how I respond to it is not the topic of conversation. I was just responding to that particular poster's claims about the thread's intentions.

 

[Centexfarmer]

In the end, I don't care if it's tossed back at me, and how I respond to it is not the topic of conversation. I was just responding to that particular poster's claims about the thread's intentions.

I'm the 200th Poster in this thread, AND a Moderator DOUBLE BONUS!

So at his point I get to ask what was the original intention of this thread?

Now don't think that you don't win anything either.

You now have three options.

1. Reinstate your original intent of this thread.
2. Gather information that's been shared up to this point and state a new intention.
3. Since you're the OP advocate publicly that you'd like to have it closed, and start a new thread.
   

WIN/WIN!

If you choose NOT to answer then you forfeit, and we can either have fun at your expense, or consign this thread topic to the dust bind.

I'm willing to guess at this point that you really don't care because 'nothing really matters,' but out of respect.

 

[palbert]

I'm confused. How was this thread opened "anonymously?"

 

[navigaytion]

So at his point I get to ask what was the original intention of this thread?

That would be what was included in the title. Listing "Annoying Habits of Jubbers" anonymously. The OP gave a good example and I've been consistent about it. Others, like AWP, have been also. So, the model is clear. Whether you or others want to deviate from it, which is what you have been doing, is not something I can or will be held responsible for.

 

[Centexfarmer]

That would be what was included in the title. Listing "Annoying Habits of Jubbers" anonymously. The OP gave a good example and I've been consistent about it. Others, like AWP, have been also. So, the model is clear. Whether you or others want to deviate from it, which is what you have been doing, is not something I can or will be held responsible for.

Yes, and since you're the OP post #1 that created this thread, I'm offering the reigns back over to you.

WIN/WIN!

How would you like to see this your thread proceed from this point?

Obviously (based upon your responses) you haven't received 100% of the responses that you would like to have, so I'm offering you the chance to reinstate your objective.

 

[pat grimshaw]

… but quickly dismiss the other posts as scumbags.

At least there is one here :B

I hope you're not referring to me.

Another things that annoys me is those JUBbers who end their post with the words 'End of story.'

It is SO doctrinaire!

 

[palbert]

61 F and cloudy, while we wait for word from campaign headquarters.

Ending in "just saying" is annoying too. What does that mean?

Back to you...