He makes perfect sense, and an excellent point.
You wrote, "I picture her crying in the meeting, unable to control herself - good for a mom perhaps, but not for an elected official with real responsibities and decisions to make."
Of course what you "picture" never happened, it's made up in your own imagination -- and that means it reveals nothing about Boxer but a lot about how you view women.
Is that the way your mom reacted? Barbara Boxer is a mom and she's never exhibited behavior anything remotely like what you describe.
In fact, Barbara Boxer demonstrated in the very speech you started this thread about that she is not weak and weepy, unable to control herself -- she's stong and assertive and isn't afraid to stand up to authority by confronting them with issues that most people are too timid to address.
Nick - since u decided to revive this thread 3 weeks later (hmmm), I'll respond to your response to my response to SOMEONE ELSE
First - how I view women is none of your concern - not on your radar - not in your skill set - fill in the blanks - you demean yourself by going there - there that u know nothing about - but ur doing that a lot lately
My point is simply - so simply that even u should know - that the emotional aspect of governing is bad - has no place - governing is about making smart decisions unimpacted by your feelings
pretty simple
pretty simple for u to twist


						







