Sgt Pepper
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
- Posts
- 4,145
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 38
Is it too much to ask that Audrey and Da'Vonne run the table and get to the F2 together while laughing at everyone else a la Jun & Alison?
Cuz here's the thing: this how DESPERATELY needs another female winner. Or more to the point: this show desperately needs a different kind of female winner. The fact is, not only has this show only had 5 out of 15 female winners, but only TWO of those came from the last nine seasons. That's not a random distinction either. In my view, BB really changed after All Stars with the Season of the Donatos signaling a new era of very heavy handed production manipulation, more audience participation/stupid twists, and more bottom-feeder casting in terms of 1) bigots 2) meatheads 3) stereotypes and 4) dumb women. Yes there were always these types on this show but consider that Season 3 and Season 4 gave us BRILLIANT women of color in Danielle and Jun, Season 5 gave us the hilarious Marvin and Season 6 managed to give us a Latina lesbian and her black gay sidekick and the first Muslim contestant who was both HOT and an audience favorite. Back then, there seemed to be a concerted effort to find people of color who didn't just fit a stereotype the audience could mock (like the crazy/religious black chick who has no chance of winning a la Jameeka, Chima or Jocasta) and at least some women with personalities and marbles. I don't think it's any coincidence that in the six seasons from BB2 to All Stars there were 3 female and 3 male winners. In other words EXACTY EQUITABLE. 50% female winners. Meanwhile in the post-All Star era there have only been two female winners. TWO out of NINE. A drop to 22%. And consider not only the vast difference in quantity but also quality. The three pre-All Star female winners were Lisa, Jun and Maggie -- ALL level-headed, smart, strong women whether you liked them or not. Hell BB6 even featured an all female F4 and BB5 had savvy female players like Nakomis and Diane making it all the way to F4 and F3 respectively. Meanwhile the post-All Star female winners include an idiot savant (Jordan) and a lunatic hobag (Rachel). Neither of those women could hold a candle to the likes of Nicole (BB2), Danielle and Lisa (BB3), Jun, Allison and Erika (BB4), Nakomis and Diane (BB5), or Janelle/Maggie/Ivette/April (BB6).
In the post-All Stars era, who are the women who even came close to the level of personality/gameplay of the women listed above? I count just two: Danielle Donato and Keesha, and the former was helped by a completely rigged season on BB8 and the latter was still outwitted/used by two guys. Ditto Britney who I love but who clearly has no game and who was outwitted/used by four guys on BB12. Furthermore, only bimbos like Porsche, Gina Marie and Victoria even come close to winning now.
Basically this show needs another solid female winner soon. For all its (and Probst's) flaws, Survivor actually does much better job of casting smarter women and actually having a roster of solid recent female winners like Sophie, Kim, Denise and Natalie.
Cuz here's the thing: this how DESPERATELY needs another female winner. Or more to the point: this show desperately needs a different kind of female winner. The fact is, not only has this show only had 5 out of 15 female winners, but only TWO of those came from the last nine seasons. That's not a random distinction either. In my view, BB really changed after All Stars with the Season of the Donatos signaling a new era of very heavy handed production manipulation, more audience participation/stupid twists, and more bottom-feeder casting in terms of 1) bigots 2) meatheads 3) stereotypes and 4) dumb women. Yes there were always these types on this show but consider that Season 3 and Season 4 gave us BRILLIANT women of color in Danielle and Jun, Season 5 gave us the hilarious Marvin and Season 6 managed to give us a Latina lesbian and her black gay sidekick and the first Muslim contestant who was both HOT and an audience favorite. Back then, there seemed to be a concerted effort to find people of color who didn't just fit a stereotype the audience could mock (like the crazy/religious black chick who has no chance of winning a la Jameeka, Chima or Jocasta) and at least some women with personalities and marbles. I don't think it's any coincidence that in the six seasons from BB2 to All Stars there were 3 female and 3 male winners. In other words EXACTY EQUITABLE. 50% female winners. Meanwhile in the post-All Star era there have only been two female winners. TWO out of NINE. A drop to 22%. And consider not only the vast difference in quantity but also quality. The three pre-All Star female winners were Lisa, Jun and Maggie -- ALL level-headed, smart, strong women whether you liked them or not. Hell BB6 even featured an all female F4 and BB5 had savvy female players like Nakomis and Diane making it all the way to F4 and F3 respectively. Meanwhile the post-All Star female winners include an idiot savant (Jordan) and a lunatic hobag (Rachel). Neither of those women could hold a candle to the likes of Nicole (BB2), Danielle and Lisa (BB3), Jun, Allison and Erika (BB4), Nakomis and Diane (BB5), or Janelle/Maggie/Ivette/April (BB6).
In the post-All Stars era, who are the women who even came close to the level of personality/gameplay of the women listed above? I count just two: Danielle Donato and Keesha, and the former was helped by a completely rigged season on BB8 and the latter was still outwitted/used by two guys. Ditto Britney who I love but who clearly has no game and who was outwitted/used by four guys on BB12. Furthermore, only bimbos like Porsche, Gina Marie and Victoria even come close to winning now.
Basically this show needs another solid female winner soon. For all its (and Probst's) flaws, Survivor actually does much better job of casting smarter women and actually having a roster of solid recent female winners like Sophie, Kim, Denise and Natalie.


























