Sgt Pepper
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
- Posts
- 4,145
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 38
They are going back and forth on that. Nicole likes the idea of splitting the showmance but Cliff thinks Tommy is more likely to beat them in the kind of trivia endgame comps they need to win (and it's true, Holly & Jackson suck at those). I honestly don't know which option is better for them. On one hand, who goes to F4 with a showmance? But on the other hand, who can trust Tommy to boot Jackson at F4?  
A similar dilemma faced BB7 Janelle and BB14 Dan (though at F4 instead of F5). Janelle had the power boot Will or Erika and it seemed obvious to split up Chilltown, but Erika was better at comps than Will and Janelle needed to win out to get to the end. And Dan had the option to evict Shane or Ian and even though Ian was more likely to win the F3 HOH and was a bigger jury threat, Dan just couldn't risk going into F3 with a showmance. In both cases they lost: Janelle didn't even get to the end and Will lost the jury vote, but I'm not sure they made the wrong decision. I can honestly see both sides.
I was a staunch defender of the double eviction move not to target Holly & Jackson because I think it helped Nicole (and Cliff) survive F5. But now...? I mean if Tommy won the F4 veto at least you'd have a chance to convince him to boot Jackson instead of yourself but if Holly won the F4 veto, she is 100% evicting you over Jackson. I think that would make the decision for me and I would go the Janelle/Dan route and split the pair. But I don't think the decision here is obvious either way. What do you guys think? Slip?
For now I'm just going to enjoy the fact that Holly & Jackson will be privately panicking all week, Tommy will be scrambling all week, and for the second week in a row (if we count the double eviction as one week) Nicole & Cliff have all the power after being underdogs who didn't seem like they could win shit for most of the season.
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			A similar dilemma faced BB7 Janelle and BB14 Dan (though at F4 instead of F5). Janelle had the power boot Will or Erika and it seemed obvious to split up Chilltown, but Erika was better at comps than Will and Janelle needed to win out to get to the end. And Dan had the option to evict Shane or Ian and even though Ian was more likely to win the F3 HOH and was a bigger jury threat, Dan just couldn't risk going into F3 with a showmance. In both cases they lost: Janelle didn't even get to the end and Will lost the jury vote, but I'm not sure they made the wrong decision. I can honestly see both sides.
I was a staunch defender of the double eviction move not to target Holly & Jackson because I think it helped Nicole (and Cliff) survive F5. But now...? I mean if Tommy won the F4 veto at least you'd have a chance to convince him to boot Jackson instead of yourself but if Holly won the F4 veto, she is 100% evicting you over Jackson. I think that would make the decision for me and I would go the Janelle/Dan route and split the pair. But I don't think the decision here is obvious either way. What do you guys think? Slip?
For now I'm just going to enjoy the fact that Holly & Jackson will be privately panicking all week, Tommy will be scrambling all week, and for the second week in a row (if we count the double eviction as one week) Nicole & Cliff have all the power after being underdogs who didn't seem like they could win shit for most of the season.


 
						 
 
		 
 
		 
	









 
 
		 
 
		







 
 
		 
 
		 There was a jury video going around where she said this.
 There was a jury video going around where she said this.







